You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#761 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 2 » 344 weeks ago
PM please
#762 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Best of Rough Mixes Disc 1, Elimination Series Round 2 » 345 weeks ago
TWAT seems underwhelming here and gets my vote.
#763 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Best of Rough Mixes Disc 1, Elimination Series Round 1 » 345 weeks ago
Silkworms is definitely the worst one here. Rhiad has that cool funky rhythym/beat.
#764 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 4 » 346 weeks ago
Thyme seemed very epic/movie soundtrack type. I wanted to hear more of it. This album definitely more of the "experimental" type. Can't see casuals liking it at all.
#765 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 4 » 346 weeks ago
Nothing sounds like Axl is just chilling on the beach while he wrote this. It's got this beach/chill vibe. It's a b side tune but interesting and a refresher from the heavy rockers.
#766 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rough Mixes Disc 4 » 346 weeks ago
I'd like a PM for this please!
#767 Re: Guns N' Roses » Quick Song Disc » 346 weeks ago
Another example....
In 2001-02, very crucial years, when new songs get dropped from the set(Riad temporarily, Silkworms, OMG), nothing new takes their place.
That's going forward in reverse.
I almost wonder where the heck do you put an MTV video award appearance (any year not just 2002). I think the negative response to that and the disaster of a tour put in a further funk and basically the progress of the record came to a halt.
I think I might have debuted the new songs at the MTV awards instead of Rock in Rio 2001.
#768 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 346 weeks ago
That's not even the dumbest thing the Trump admin did today. They fucking sent their talking points of the day to the Democrats by accident.
#769 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 346 weeks ago
Randall Flagg wrote:Randall Flagg wrote:They'd be stupid to impeach over this. The Senate will never support it - Graham has already came out saying so. This was a nothing burger, once again. I'm all ears for people who've read it to explain what happened that was illegal and improper. I didn't see anything about demanding dirt for aide, as was claimed 24 hours ago. So let's watch the goal post move once again.
I don't think you possess the maturity level or honesty to understand what is happening right now. The White House just did something similar prior to the release of the Mueller report. They got their hands on it first, modified it and then released it to the public. Just like Barr's four page summary of Mueller's report. The only difference is that in this one, it clearly shows criminality. It's 100% prima facie evidence.
Last time you idiots all came here to say it was nothing (based on Barr's false synopsis) and it turned out you were wrong. There were nearly a dozen instances of obstruction by trump. The report also concluded that he was open to accepting help from Russia and use it against Hillary (same as now.) Today you continue to lie about that outcome, because you're a liar I suppose?
It's also only one facet of the whistle-blower report, which is being reported this evening that Trump also tried to hide evidence of this call. In addition people who have read the report said it's staggering in its criminality and "explosive."
But really, even if nothing else came up (which there will) Trump asking a foreign country for help against a potential political rival in the 2020 election is something to get impeached for. It's not a "nothing burger", it's a crime. He's already admitted he did it, along wit Guiliani and changed his story on withholding military aid. He should be impeached, and frankly I'm already seeing cracks in the GOP. As we go down the road, I would not be surprised to see more say "Enough" of this criminal.
Andrea Mitchell (veteran political reporter) said that 30 GOP senators would vote to impeach Trump if this were private. That is damning in itself.
#770 Re: Guns N' Roses » Quick Song Disc » 346 weeks ago
Really catch type jam song. I love the time changes. And that's even with the vocals that I can't figure out what Axl is saying. This should have been on the album.
Thinking about Rough Disc #1, if you add this onto that, that album isn't even a huge departure from classic Guns stuff.
I almost hate to bring up this next point: but hasn't all this material sort of vindicated (hate to use this but can't find it) Axl? I mean the material here is mostly guitar driven and isn't the different direction or style that Slash (and I guess Duff) had claimed at the time.
