You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#811 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Slash to play golden gods awards (also Sixx Am) » 760 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:

You're a Lie was better last time, at Jimmy Kimmel, I think Myles didn't hear himself or the band right. But Nothing to Say... what a monster! And Slash played again like a guitar god who has something to prove. A++++++++ 21

#812 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Slash to play golden gods awards (also Sixx Am) » 760 weeks ago

mickronson wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:
metallex78 wrote:

That's fucking AWESOME!!! 14

Ooooh, wonder what THAT means.


Three guesses

A little snipe at 'Rose n Roses' latest guitarist?   That was my first thought but now thinking about it I don't think he would intentionally imply something like that, but just my op.

No way it'd be against DJ Ashba. No fn' way. That's not Slash. I doubt that he was aware of this strange situation.

#813 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » Slash to play golden gods awards (also Sixx Am) » 760 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:

Duff McKagan presents the Golden God Award Riff Lord to Slash

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xq2jya … rch_algo=1

The strange thing is only Slash didn't have a band below his name. roll

#814 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

Scabbie wrote:

As I thought 'lame'. Axl probably thinks this was another azoff power play.

I agree with D - time to prove your guns n roses Axl. New music!

So how's it gonna work out 'we induct guns n roses minus w. Axl rose?'

The only thing that makes me sad about this is the lauding over Axl at what essentially is a sad situation for gnr fans. The more fucked up it is with the old band the better for some people.

Agree. I'd add that he did everything to make this induction bitter for the other band members. I really wish they'd not let it happen, go out and play to have a good time. 9

#815 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

Sky Dog wrote:

For the record, again, I don't think Dizzy or Matt should have been inducted. No hired hands....original 5 only.

So you won't go to the induction either tongue

#816 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Mikka, Slash admitted he lied about the visit.

Yeah. But he didn't say the Axl's version was right either. There are cases when both camps are lying. And as it seems, that happened years ago, and Slash didn't talk about it in the past few months. So it didn't hurt the chances of Axl coming out of his mansion.

misterID wrote:

"Under the circumstances I feel we've been polite, courteous, and open to an amicable solution in our efforts to work something out. Taking into consideration the history of Guns N' Roses, those who plan to attend along with those the Hall for reasons of their own, have chosen to include in "our" induction (that for the record are decisions I don't agree with, support or feel the Hall has any right to make), and how (albeit no easy task) those involved with the Hall have handled things... no offense meant to anyone but the Hall Of Fame Induction Ceremony doesn't appear to be somewhere I'm actually wanted or respected."

Mad, I'm thinking Matt being inducted is what he's protesting, and maybe something about the new line up, maybe not to let them be inducted but to acknowledge them. I don't know, that comment was very vague. If their were negotiations to try and find common ground as what he had a problem with, I don't understand what he means that they didn't ask anything of them.

I mean, the first thing that entered my mind was that he wanted to do his speech seperately from the other guys, but again, that's just conjecture as we don't know what the hell is going on... even when Axl tells us!

Yeah, that's what Bono and I found intriguing, too. There lies the answer to the no-show decision. Did he want to accept the award, but perform with the new band? Did he want to get inducted all the past and present members? Maybe time will tell, but his critic against the actual inductees points to the later, or some version of it. Poor brain-dead Steven's comments had nothing to do with Axl's decision, that was only used as a smokescreen.

#817 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

killingvector wrote:

We could review Steven's comments just in these past few months, culminating in an unsolicited attack against the new band.

I think there was a real danger he would say or do something to embarrass Axl.

To be fair, Slash's revisionist history of the infamous house visit certainly was ill timed.

Did Slash talk about that now? I missed it. Was badly timed, for sure, if happened. BTW we don't even know the real history, so it's bold to say what revisionism is in this case.

Anyway, I think those parts of Axl's letters are only there to dodge the attention from the real issue, the one Bono was talknig about.

#818 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

killingvector wrote:

@Mikka

Would you want to stand on stage next to a man with a mental age of 2 who has blamed you for the break up of the band and the inability for the group to reunite?

The chances of something bad happening accelerate with Adler up there unrestrained. Expect someone to make a crack at his expense.

I don't think that would have been a major danger. First of all, I'm not sure Steven would get the chance to speak to the crowd. Second, he could have behaved. Third, Axl is big enough to say 'you were once my band, now I have others, whom I prefer, thanks, I don't wanna play with you anymore'. Not worse than this letter.

#819 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

Bono wrote:
Ali wrote:

Where exactly does he say that certain original members should not have been inducted?  Where are you reading that?

Ali

he says he dosnt' agree with who or who isn't being inducted. I clearly said in my post it's one or the other. It's plain as day Ali.

Yep- My main problem with Axl's interviews and statements (beside the cancer comments and such) that he's writing and saying these long, shady rants and it's only to hide his real intentions and opinion. Never a sincere, straight sentence. The man we once knew said what he thought. Now it's like reading a politician's spin doctorish press release. 17


(I guess it took away at least 2 days of work from the 'forthcoming' album.)

#820 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 760 weeks ago

killingvector wrote:

I don't have a problem with the decision. Certain members of the old band (*cough Adler *cough) have seemingly made this a risky venture for Axl. I think he feared an attempt to embarrass him or force into a performance or conversation that he does not want to have.

I am shocked he is turning down the award completely. He could have accepted it en absentia.

PS. Steven Adler really should reap the lion's share of blame for his inability to keep his trap shut all these months. It was a volatile situation to start, but he made the situation unbearable.

I don't think Adler should be blamed for it. How could you blame a man with a 2-year old child's brain? He's only done his part, as usual. Nothing shocking.


I'm more curious about these parts of Axl's letter and I'm bloody sure that some rumours/infos will surface about the deserved 'amicable solution'.


Axl Rose wrote:

I feel we've been polite, courteous, and open to an amicable solution in our efforts to work something out. ...For the record, I would not begrudge anyone from Guns their accomplishments or recognition for such. Neither I or anyone in my camp has made any requests or demands of the Hall Of Fame..

We will hear about those 'no requests' and 'no demands'...

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB