You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#821 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Just a theory, anyone wonder if maybe someone (newspaper) dug something up on Mooch & questioned WH officials on it? Something the WH would be embarrased about so they pre-emptively axed him?! (sex tape, call girl client list etc).
While Trump and ‘Mooch’ were creating diversions — lawmakers heard explosive testimony in Russia probe
One of the most important congressional hearings yet in the Trump-Russia probe took place Wednesday, in the midst of one of President Donald Trump’s most chaotic weeks yet.
Bill Browder — once the biggest portfolio investor in Russia but now a leading critic of Vladimir Putin — told the Senate Judiciary Committee how the Russian president needs to lift U.S. sanctions to deliver what he promised to corrupt oligarchs who support his rule, reported Huffington Post.
“There are approximately 10,000 officials in Russia working for Putin who are given instructions to kill, torture, kidnap, extort money from people and seize their property,” Browder testified.
Browder and his attorney, Sergei Magnitsky, blew the whistle on a scam by corrupt Russian officials to steal one of his companies and then illegally claimed back $230 million taxes he’d paid.
U.S. imposed sanctions in 2012 against some Putin cronies involved in the attorney’s death, which a Russian attorney asked Donald Trump to lift in exchange for campaign assistance offered to his son and other top campaign officials.
“Before the Magnitsky Act, Putin could guarantee them impunity and this system of illegal wealth accumulation worked smoothly,” Browder testified. “However, after the passage of the Magnitsky Act, Putin’s guarantee disappeared.”
Putin himself has suffered great consequences under the Magnitsky Act, the hedge fund manager told lawmakers, because the Panama Papers show Putin received some of the money stolen from the scheme exposed by Magnitsky.
“Based on the language of the Magnitsky Act, this would make Putin personally subject to Magnitsky sanctions,” Browder testified.
“This is particularly worrying for Putin, because he is one of the richest men in the world,” he continued. “I estimate that he has accumulated $200 billion of ill-gotten gains from these types of operations over his 17 years in power.”
Browder then dropped the hammer, just hours after Trump surprisingly announced a ban on transgender service members.
“(Putin) keeps his money in the West and all of his money in the West is potentially exposed to asset freezes and confiscation,” Browder testified. “Therefore, he has a significant and very personal interest in finding a way to get rid of the Magnitsky sanctions.”
The testimony received less coverage than other hearings, in part because Browder is more obscure than previous witnesses — but also because it came after Trump’s raunchy speech to Boy Scouts and a day ahead of a profane rant by new communications chief Anthony Scaramucci.
#822 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Nah, you still cling to conspiracy nonsense and misreading articles. Still think Russia hacked our voting machines?
The far left's obsession with conspiracy doesn't negate Trump's poor performance and erratic behavior. Some of us are consistent. Some only howl when their enemy does something wrong. It's apparent which side you fall on.
There goes lyin' Randy again. Can't help himself.
What is weird though is your indirect defense of Trump and this investigation. Even after you're proven wrong again and again as this story unfolds, you continue. How much egg on your face before you get a clue?
Well yes I believe Russia was in our voting machines, because there have been reports that said they were...moron. Voter databases and other software was absolutely compromised. A leaked NSA document also said the same thing. The only people denying it are 1) The Kremlin 2) Guys who lose sleep every night working through their transexual panic.
#823 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Nervous yet?
The Latest: Abe, Trump agree to action against North Korea
SEOUL, South Korea (AP) — The Latest on North Korea’s latest intercontinental ballistic missile launch (all times local):
10 a.m. Monday
Japan’s Prime Minister Shinzo Abe says he and President Donald Trump have spoken by phone and agreed to take further action against North Korea following its latest missile launch.
Abe told reporters after the call Monday morning Asia time that Trump pledged to “take all necessary measures to protect” Japan and that Abe praised his commitment to do so.
Abe said Japan would pursue concrete steps to bolster defense system and capabilities under the firm solidarity with the U.S. and do utmost to protect the safety of the Japanese people.
Analysis of the launch late Friday concluded most of the U.S. is now in range of North Korean weaponry.
___
1 p.m. Sunday
The United States has flown two supersonic bombers over the Korean Peninsula in a show of force against North Korea following its latest intercontinental ballistic missile test. The U.S. also said it conducted a successful test of a missile defense system located in Alaska.
The U.S. Pacific Air Forces said in a statement the B-1 bombers were escorted by South Korean fighter jets as they performed a low-pass on Sunday over an air base near the South Korean capital of Seoul before returning to Andersen Air Force Base in Guam.
It said the mission was a response to North Korea’s two ICBM tests this month. Analysts say data from the test conducted Friday night showed a broader part of the mainland United States, including Los Angeles and Chicago, is now in range of Pyongyang’s weapons.
#824 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Smoking Guns wrote:Let's see what the new Chief of Staff can get done. Seems like this was his call. I like it.
A lot can happen in the next 39 months, but Trump has proven far too toxic and far too cavalier. A leader doesn't go through staff like this. Yes, Obama had 5 chiefs of staff in 8 years. But Trump alienates his cabinet, issues edicts over Twitter and hasn't been able to rally the GOP behind him. This isn't how an American president behaves or leads.
Liberal hysterics ^^
Pay no attention to these types.
#825 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
#826 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Friday News Dump: Reince Preibus is out
Not surprised there....but Christ what a mess.
At least the Mooch is providing A+ entertainment. That New Yorker piece
I've seen a few people publicly request Joe Pesci to read it out loud.
#827 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
Scaramucci seems to be as crazy as Trump. Anybody read the New Yorker piece?
#828 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
I'd just like to point out that the fuckery the GOP is going through with healthcare, is the exact problem Democrats went through in 2009, albeit with less publicity.
Not even remotely the same.
#829 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 484 weeks ago
There go those fiscal conservatives again...guess we'll send the bill to Mexico huh?
House approves spending bill with $1.6 billion for the border wall
The House voted Thursday to approve a spending bill with $1.6 billion to put toward a border wall along the US-Mexico border, part of a high-profile campaign pledge from President Donald Trump.
Despite Trump's pledge to make Mexico pay for the wall, the bill earmarks taxpayer money to construct a carrier along the southwest border. To avoid having those Republicans who oppose the measure vote on it directly House Republican leaders tucked it into a procedural measure that set the debate plan for the so-called "minibus" funding bill for several federal agencies.
The bill passed 235-192 mostly along party lines.
The wall funding was added to a measure that combined funding bills for the Pentagon, energy and water, legislative branch, military construction and Veterans Affairs.
The $658 billion defense spending legislation was $27 billion more than Trump's budget request, and would provide the military additional fighter jets, ships, helicopters and troops that the Pentagon had requested.
While the wall funding was the most contentious piece of the appropriations bill, it was just a small sliver of the spending package the House approved.
The defense spending bill also conforms to the House's budget outline, but it violates the Budget Control Act spending caps commonly known as sequestration. The Senate is not planning to give the military the same level of funding unless the caps are lifted, which would require congressional action.
Senate Democrats are demanding equal increases to domestic and military spending in any funding agreement, a debate that will heat up closer to the October 1 deadline for Congress to fund the government.
CNN



