You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#901 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 644 weeks ago
Thx for the info. I already looked at Wal-Mart and I saw nothing, but Wal-Mart's are weird. Some carry music-related DVD's/Blu-Ray's, and other's don't. And when they do, it's usually something epicly gay like Luke Bryan.
I'm assuming that Fantracks digital download will be a traditional MP3 download? Anyone get any confirmation on that? Anytime someone ask that question on MyGNR, it's specifically ignored, and I get this sneaky feeling that it will be downloadable, but only playable through the Fantracks app. I hope not.
I really wish they would've been able to secure the CD release. I probably would rather have that than the damn Blu-Ray itself.
#902 Re: Guns N' Roses » So rumour has it.. » 644 weeks ago
Yeah bro, I think its beyond lame at this point too. I really do. Come on guys it's a 20+ year grudge that was over 15 year's ago, even if there was lawsuits.
But then again, if TB was telling the truth and that "former member" (Slash) derailed a CD release because he wouldn't sign off on some license... that wound will always be open. Then again Axl did the same thing to Slash on his live solo release.
In fairness though, they also refer to Robin as "Robert John Finck", Tommy as "Thomas Stinson", and Dizzy as "Darren Reed". But Duff is "Duff Rose McKagan", Izzy is "Izzy Stradlin" and the rest of new GN'R is the way they were credited in Chinese. So maybe it was a joke or a ASCAP thing.
#903 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 644 weeks ago
Oh and another thing regarding the Izzy quotes and how 'legit' Intercourse is because he's quoting interviews... I may have not quoted any actual quotes, but all of my feelings and statements are derived from FAR FAR FAR more recent statements by the band, including Izzy himself, as well as Axl, Slash & Duff.
Now in fairness, I can understand quoting Izzy (at the time) may make sense because it was all fresh. But it is in fact the incorrect way to view history. History is NEVER written immediately as it happens.
You read that interview with Izzy & Axl and I read that interview with Izzy & Axl, and got two entirely different reactions to it. What I saw was Izzy not feeling his opinion was valued. And the band. Not Axl--THE BAND disagreed. And what did Izzy do? He quit.
Then to Axl, "Izzy wanted the power and financial rewards of MY vision". I see that as a totally true statement from Axl. Axl even says it right in the interview YOU quoted. Izzy wanted to play clubs and keep GN'R a LA version of the New York Dolls. Izzy never wanted Rolling Stones-level success. Hell watch Axl & Izzy perform Salt of the Earth with the Stones in 1989. Axl is having a BALL performing with Mick. You can see it as a dream realized. Izzy looks stiff, uncomfortable, and out of his element. Whether it was being awe struck, or what I said. Izzy was never destined to be a super star, no different than Buckethead isn't. They just don't play the game the right way.
Axl knew this. Slash knew this. Duff knew this.
But you are not giving ANY bullshit to Slash & Duff, and neither are your fans in this thread. It's all "fuck Axl". Well that's fine, fuck Axl. But let's fuck Slash & fuck Duff too. The three of them ALL wanted super-stardom. And when Axl said "me & Slash are a team" Axl was referring solely to Izzy's lack of interest in wanting to be anymore than a small act. Izzy didn't want to take it to the next level. Izzy didn't want to follow a schedule (yeah I know, ironic considering Axl). Izzy was fine being a minor-leaguer, and Axl, Slash & Duff all wanted to be World Champion New York Yankees. They wanted to be at the Show in a major league way. A legendary way, and they were all in agreement (or so they thought). Izzy didn't want that, and Izzy (according to your quotes) made it clear he didn't want that.
It almost makes you wonder if Izzy quit because he thought Axl & Slash would force him out no different than Steven.
My proof? Has Slash toured with Izzy?
Point proven
Izzy might be one of the most unreliable GN'R members in the history of the band, more than Axl, more than Bucket. And this is the guy with the truth? I would take it with more of a grain of salt than Axl or Slash.
Lomax wrote:Smoking Guns wrote:M Axl probably has the biggest overall character issues and has probably always been the biggest dick (see Erin, Stephanie, Kurt Cobain, on and on for evidence).
Yes because ex-grilfriends and enemies are sure to give unbiased accounts of a persons character.
Therefore it's quite fortunate that we have Axl fanboys who haven't even met their God in person, but help to tell the truth to clear things up.
The only people with a God fetish around here are you and your buddies, with your obvious fixation on Slash.
We have a TON of Slashites on this board. But I for one have NEVER seen an Axlite on Evo in its entire existence. All I see is people slagging on how much Axl's voice sucks today, Axl sucks, Axl broke up the band, Axl created the AIDS virus. Fuck him.
If that's an Axl fanboy... i'd hate to meet the guys who actually hate him.
#904 Re: Guns N' Roses » So rumour has it.. » 644 weeks ago
What was denied? The firing (really? anyone actually think that TB is gonna get fired?) I know, but the behind-the-scenes drama over the release is something worth looking into.
I still want to know why there was gonna be a CD release, and suddenly it's shelved. Everyone wanted to blame "Slash revenge for his release", but I just would like a better explanation from RockFuel. They announced it, then they just dropped it. They still have the DVD+CD release listed in random places.
#905 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 644 weeks ago
So is this thing going to be released on a DVD+CD format or not? RockFuel announced, then all of the sudden it's supposed to be a Digital-only release, but only through Fantracks.
Does anybody know anything?
#906 Re: Guns N' Roses » So rumour has it.. » 644 weeks ago
My first reaction was...
So you can fire your mother?
Press Release--"I would just like to thank former mother associate Ms. Lebeis for years of countless hours, and aforementioned managing. We will be looking for a mother replacement effective immediately. Once that decision has been finalized, we'll head into the studio for two weeks. From that point it takes 6 weeks to master our new record. Fingers crossed, and as always blame Canada--AR"
My whole thoughts on this is Axl probably has gotten into knock-down drag out arguments with Beta. When you're family--it happens to us all. She's seen him at his worst, she's seen him at his best (maybe?). It happens, and has probably happened before.
It probably goes something like this...
Axl: "You said to them we'd play THAT show?!?!? What the fuck?"
Beta: "I had to honor the contractual blah blah blah"
Axl: "I can't fucking BELIEVE YOU DID THAT!!! AGGHHHHHHHHH!"
Beta: "I can't deal with this anymore if you're going to be like this. I quit"
Axl: "Oh no no no, you can't quit bitch. YOU'RE FIRED! (in Mr. McMahon voice)"
Beta: "Fuck you"
Axl: "Fuck you"
And then one or the both of them threatens to commit suicide, and the other talks the other off the ledge and cooler heads prevail, and next day its lovey dovey like after makeup sex (not literally).
The better question is, I have a hard time swallowing MSL's statement about Axl not knowing ANYTHING about the DVD/soundtrack release. That's the hardest pill to swallow. Come the fuck on, really? The band claims they didn't know about it, but that's not really that uncommon. Per the Blu-Ray the band gave their interviews, and Team Brazil + Universal Music handled the rest. Unless the band were contacted to do press, then its over and done without the need of the band. Let's be honest, this is still---Axl Rose solo, especially when it comes to the business side. The band gets their cut, they are contracted out for their touring purposes, and studio purposes, but past that, their job is done.
Axl on the other hand---is Axl. This guy posts random shit on his Twitter account about dead dogs and fucking zoo's n' shit. There's NO WAY IN HELL I believe Axl didn't know this thing was being released. The liner notes have Team Brazil's stamp ALL over them. Including referring to Slash as -- "Saul Hudson" -- but referring to Duff as "Duff 'Rose' McKagan" like he's back in the fold.
I think Axl is saddle sore (at the least) in regards to doing business with... the business. That's not counting random craziness. I think all it could take is, "oh wait we couldn't get the rights to the Neil Young cover?" "No", "Fuck it, shelve the fuckin' thing". Who fucking knows with Axl.
Let's all remember something... it was London 2012 (or 2011?) that was supposed to originally be the theater film/DVD/soundtrack release with Izzy doing a random guest-spot. That was what it was going to be, and it got shelved and shelved and shelved and pushed back and so on, 'til it finally just leaked and found Axl incredibly Mickey. Suddenly its all about capturing The Joint shows in Vegas, which they had already done a couple prior to that that were Pay-Per-View's with pretty identical setlists. So what's so special about this one?
If you notice Axl vocally is alot better for a 2012 show on this. I wonder... what if Axl refuses to go into the studio and work? What if, even re-recording vocals, Axl refuses to do it? And so that "former band member holding up release: isn't Slash, but in fact Axl himself? Team Brazil might've had to find a show, some show that showcased a better Axl, because Axl absolutely wouldn't re-record the vocals AND he wouldn't okay the release without an at least 'average' performance from himself vocally?
Just a thought
#907 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 644 weeks ago
Oh goddammit Intercourse, you are so fucking reaching on those statements. You're concluding Axl's statements regarding Slash BEFORE the breakup as definitive proof of his opinion and to quote George Bush "flip flopper" status, yet me, you, and every fucking fence post in the world know you cannot compare the two.
That's like the argument of the girl who cheated on her husband citing, "but you said you loved me at the alter", after she spend her Friday's in interracial gangbangs with the local football team. Yeah but but but.... you said you'd love me "as long as we both shall live". That's what you said....
That's the logic you're using right now. Every statement I used came out of Slash's own mouth--post in the break up. From whatever interview he's doing today to his own auto-bio (which most consider their definitive statement on well... everything).
Young Axl said that GN'R would never turn into what old Axl turned it into--yeah and old Axl never thought his friend (Izzy) would tuck and run when the heat got turned up. Old Axl probably never envisioned St. Louis ever happening, and yet it did. Old Axl never thought that when the going got tough that Slash would've just up and quit the band. Do you know what that fucking means? Do you have any clue? A band literally is a marriage. That's like a wife, out of the blue, coming and asking for a divorce, and citing NO reason, other than the fact you didn't like her Christmas gifts (pretty much the equivalent of Slash's logic of quitting at the time). And when pressed for a response--oh yeah, you're a dictator. Dictator of what? I'm not gonna talk about it, because I need my cool moment, like i'm making some fucking statement. And here we are.... if Axl's guilty, then Slash is equally if not more so guilty because as soon as they weren't working (or fucking in my analogy)--he bolted. Slash has NEVER owned up to his guilt in this--EVER. Slash has never owned up to the statement he made not just qutting on Axl, but also leaving his main man Duff behind. It was not a universal decision. Slash bailed on Duff too.
The only thing i've seen from you is "the power rewards of my vision". That's your smoking gun? And i'm the one in fucking dream world? Okay Fred Krueger...
#908 Re: Guns N' Roses » Matt Sorum open to Playing with Current GNR Line-up » 645 weeks ago
Intercourse. Stop making sense, your facts are getting in the way of Axlin's good story.
Good story telling will always be superior to the truth...
Look at 9/11

#909 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 645 weeks ago
Watched the videos, and they are way better than I would've ever expected an officially released new Guns Blu-Ray/DVD to sound.
Jungle is just as good as its ever been, and shows Axl can still be Axl.
You Could Be Mine shows the more modern-era Axl, but I mean that in a factual sense. Obviously it's not as strong as it was in the heyday, and it's missing Duff's prescence. but YCBM has been a vocal-bitch for Axl since reviving the band in 2001. He has sucked on it, more often than rules, excluding flashes here and there in 2006-07, 2009-10. But tbh, in Axl's condition today... this might be one of the strongest YCBM's since the old days, even if the Mickey is there.
Sweet Child... I want to love it, but I just can't. I haven't cared for any interpretation of this song since the old band. Slash only does it justice instrumentally, and Axl vocally has sucked on it since post-1993. I really can't stand Myles Kennedy's voice, but this is the one and only song I will give Slash & The Conspirators as having the superior live version.
I can't wait to get this set and listen to more! Really cool to finally have SOME-THING official from the band released. In 20 years it's basically been Live Era, Hits, Chinese and this! Hopefully the future in the next couple years brings much more!
#910 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 645 weeks ago
Looks like... and this is a shocker... Guns N' Roses have released three all new music videos to help promote the Blu-Ray/DVD.
Official GN'R videos, get 'em while they're hot. They only release them ONE-PER-TWENTY YEARS!!!
Guns N' Roses -- Welcome To The Jungle (Live) [Vegas 2012] (2014)
Guns N' Roses -- You Could Be Mine (Live) [Vegas 2012] (2014)
Guns N' Roses -- Sweet Child O' Mine (Live) [Vegas 2012] (2014)
