You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1191 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Walking Dead » 560 weeks ago

This show is so stupid. & shit.

I never fail to be impressed by the level of stupidity & the sheer amount of shit they are capable of putting on screen.

That is some magic bullet that took out Carl's eye. Did it bounce off the ground or deflect off a pebble maybe before shooting into his head?

The ONE good thing in this episode was the kid being munched on. That was a sweet death. The rest of the episode, all of it, was just shit. Another goddamn 43mins of my life wasted.

#1192 Re: The Sunset Strip » Kanye: "I did not diss Taylor Swift" » 560 weeks ago

I genuinely don't get why people give a shit..??

I've followed Kanye from the get go - liked the first two albums, loved my beautiful dark twisted fantasy & have been left nonplussed by the rest. His singles have often been inspired - runaway, goldigger are exceptional. Runaway in particular I thought was one of the songs of the century so far, that great yea (but I was a big clipse fan before that).

But as to why there's a thread about this 'controversy' on a GnR forum I don't understand what you're getting out of it.. I hear he likes a finger (or thumb?) up his ass while fucking.. That'd be more appropriate for discussion imo.. Can't fault the guy for that either really..

#1193 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

Steven couldn't keep his shit together to open for Loaded in Japan. Then turns around and blames Duff for not being sensitive enough because he's a drunk. If you think his only meltdown/fuck up was farm aid, I don't know what to tell you neutral

I don't think that was an overreach.

I was talking about Stevens time in guns & how often he jeopardised gigs/things. But I forgot that he bust his hand/or was in rehab once before that & they had to bring in don Henley.

misterID wrote:

I don't see how I'm being harsh, especially when people used to brag how rock n roll his behavior was. Axl used to say something like he'd be waiting for him to show up in 2006 for a show and find out after he no showed that Izzy decided to go dirtbiking in India instead.

Yeah, I would say counting on Izzy for a tour that will quite possibly bring over a hundred million, that I would be a bit concerned over Izzy showing up from night to night.


O....k then. Well.. Ok. Whatever you think man.
17
19

#1194 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

There were several dates Izzy agreed to play with GNR where he no showed, as recently as the Vegas gigs in 2014. They literally had no idea when he would decide to show up.

So for that he's one of two most irresponsible/undependable headaches?! Big fuckin deal mate. He was only a guest star at that stage.. Think you're being a bit harsh on him tbh.

#1195 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

Where do these doubts about Izzys professionalism come from? When have they ever not been able to depend on him? Hell he even filled in for Gilby when Gilby couldn't be depended upon/got injured..??
Izzy's a freakin rock. Always been there when asked, no??


Stevens only real public fuck up was at farm aid. Obv he has his own issues these days (& then) but even still this notion that he's any less reliable than Axl is a bit peculiar when you look at their professional (mis)conduct & performances.

Bullshit I say. MrID overreached when he called them out as being the two most irresponsible/undependable.

#1196 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

I dunno if the average joes even care that much about Slash being back tbh.
It was them, with their disposable income, that bought into the brand that filled the most recent tours. A lot of fans & hardcores stayed away from the '08/'09 shows. I didn't do the '09 shows.

My original point was still, it may be relatively inconsequential but it still does make a difference.

& im not boycotting. I'll be going wherever/whenever they hit Europe sans-Izzy. I'm just saying it'd have been bigger if it was the AFD5 for those shows.. I'd have made it bigger wink

#1197 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

But is that portion of the fanbase who will stay home because of Izzy and Steven really that big, or significant? Do they even really exist off the forums? Would the band really miss anything in terms of revenue? I don't believe so... And is it worth the hassle to deal with the two most irresponsible and undependable members and the headaches that would follow? Eh... I'm still not sure that fragment of the hardcore's are actually real.


Well, there's Will for one.
If they'd have announced it was solely the AFD5 I'd have travelled to Vegas.
P sure there was someone else on here.
That's 3, possibly.
Just saying.. You said it couldn't get any bigger then gave reasons why it could be slightly bigger.

Bit harsh calling out Izzy/Steven as the most irresponsible/undependable but that's another matter.

#1199 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 560 weeks ago

Mama's Good Boy wrote:

Michele Fiore is my assemblywoman sad  So embarassing

Great tits tho.

#1200 Re: Guns N' Roses » GUNS N' ROSES Rumor: IZZY STRADLIN To Take Limited Role In Reunion Rea » 560 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

I love Izzy, but he's nowhere near Slash level importance to the average Joe. He's already played with both GNR and VR and it was bigger news when Duff guested with GNR. I don't see GNR having any bigger impact than they are right now. It's actually pretty damn huge right now. Izzy and Steven don't bring anything more than pure sentimentality with some hardcore's, IMO.


I actually agree w/your original point, but by this stage ^ you're actually contradicting yourself. If they bring more therefore it can have a bigger impact.
Think of it like this: some hardcores are staying away because there's no Izzy (or Steven). They would be brought back into the crowd & therefore making it bigger. The fans/crowd that have already signed up don't care, but there exists a small minority who could theoretically make the whole thing bigger if it makes the difference for them. If the average joe has already signed up for Slash, then in theory the hardcores would make it bigger.. No??
No..

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB