You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1301 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Twitter Updates » 563 weeks ago
Same complaints came from some Soundgarden fans during their reunion.
Check this out...this was right when they started promoting the new album....small stage too as its at Sirius. Ben doesn't even attempt to go near Chris. Neither does Kim. They sound fucking incredible but yeah.....definitely not "friendly".
edit: You were referring to interaction onstage but check this out as well up until 1:20....same Sirius show. One of the few times during the 5 years this reunion has been going on where all four of them sit together for an interview. Notice how they are sitting....the distance. Chris and Kim on one side and on the other side Matt and Ben. Much animosity between Chris and Ben in the lead up to the breakup and Ben just happens to be the one furthest from Chris. I doubt that's a coincidence. While talking they do not seem happy and Kim is the only one that looks as if he might be enjoying it. it is all business. Doesn't bother me in the least because their business is releasing material which I hope we end up getting in this situation.
That last part is the thing, you're totally correct. If it works creatively, artistically, if it works that the vibrations coming out of them are what they should be then there's no scope for complaining they're not bff's. Then, maybe not only is the animosity worth enduring, it might even help the material.
I was thinking there's a chance I was reading too much into the situation but watching that interview.. It's hilarious the body language. It just helps highlight how bizarre the alchemy of bands can be cause looking solely at their body language live & in interview I could never imagine they'd be capable of producing the performances they have & the quality of King Animal. I suppose it's a similar situation with most bands, even ones who hadn't split up, just personality clashes & shit. But when it's a matter of professionalism they rise to the occasion - perhaps a reason why some bands make it & many don't.
Edit: that's the first time I've ever used BFF. I'm never going to do that again. In fact I'd delete it & edit it but I want to keep it as a shameful reminder to myself. Fuck me.
#1302 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 563 weeks ago
Do it this time man. Do it for yourself but also for all of us who wish we could go but can't. If you can go, do it.
V tempted to just say fuck it & travel for it myself.. It is expensive for a couple of rock n roll concerts when you get down to it, but I bet the energy in that room will be worth it. Ha almost talking myself into going..
#1303 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Twitter Updates » 563 weeks ago
Tokyo dvds, mate. That's the nightmare.
I think it'll be little more than a job. A 3 hour one. Axl arrives, goes on stage, leaves & never has to exchange 2 words with Slash or anyone the whole time. It's how he's been doing things for years. Just now a bit more animosity & jealousy about when it's Slash on ax & not some random like DJ/finck.. I'm afraid it'll be awkward.
#1304 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 563 weeks ago
Arcade Fire so bad. U2 bad. Worse bad.
#1305 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
johndivney wrote:Wish monkeychow/monkeynuts would return he's really the only one I know & miss. You guys say he's on mygnr or whatever but I never go on those sites..
Who is monkeynuts? Or is this a nickname for me...Lol if it's an actual user then it's not me!
No it's you. Glad to see you back. Few threads could've used your input - there was one recently about Axl that reminded me of you.
What you make of it all? Were you aware/believing in the reunion for a while?
#1306 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
johndivney wrote:Don't understand why they go to those busier forums. Monkey was more appreciated & loved here.. Or maybe not, who knows really.
He said he may come here and post later tonight.. I told him you missed him... awe.. haha..
He doesn't post at mygnr from what I know...
Bono posts there, MyGNR, some and I talk to Bono on a regular basis too. He is doing well.
Aye Bono can go fuck himself. I do miss MC tho, not ashamed to admit it!
#1307 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
Don't understand why they go to those busier forums. Monkey was more appreciated & loved here.. Or maybe not, who knows really.
#1308 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
Fan sites mate..
Have to sign up/ register. No offence,but I'm not going to sign up just to read more of your posts SG!
#1309 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
Ok this guy
http://www.gnrevolution.com/viewtopic.p … 88#p151188
Getting him confused with some other guy.
Glad to see Jamester back briefly. Wish monkeychow/monkeynuts would return he's really the only one I know & miss. You guys say he's on mygnr or whatever but I never go on those sites..
#1310 Re: Guns N' Roses » So whose back » 563 weeks ago
Whatever happened to CrimeSlunkScene?
I need his help to back up a conspiracy theory.
Was he the guy who had the alt track listing for the official release?

I need his help to back up a conspiracy theory.