You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1371 Re: Guns N' Roses » Same Old, Same Old » 566 weeks ago

sp1at wrote:

The capacity of the O2 is too small


Haha I'm liking the ambition of this thing.

#1372 Re: Guns N' Roses » Same Old, Same Old » 566 weeks ago

Sp1at - AEG have the O2 in London? (Is it even still called the o2?)
What you think of the possiblity of them doing a night or two there for the UK show or is it more than likely to be a festival appearance at this stage?

I guess arena shows are a ways down the line, but for convenience a few nights at the O2 seems a good calling card.. Maybe that notion of convenience doesn't translate to AEG & festivals tho, might just be easier to slot them onto a festival since that's the way the current is flowing atm..

#1373 Re: The Sunset Strip » Making a Murderer » 566 weeks ago

Haha

Are there any police on this board? Or people who work in security?

I have friends in both & honest to god the shit they get away with is fucking ridiculous. It's funny some of the stuff they tell you, but also some of the stuff people get up to really makes my skin crawl.
A lot of them seem to answer to no authority.
I mean this is only small time shit I'm taking about here, nothing like what's happened on this tv show. But you can see even happening on a small scale the similar sort pattern of behaviour, of circling the wagons, it's all there.

#1374 Re: Guns N' Roses » Eddie Trunk Thoughts on Reunion » 566 weeks ago

I'd have thought backstage passes would've been easy to come by than rehearsals recordings..
There's prob a few types of backstage pass too.. One for meeting Mother Goose/Frank/Del/Dizzy. Then a few more exclusive passes for access to other places n people are prob reserved for hookers/dealers (once upon a time) & family/friends..??


I imagine it'll be a very different scene backstage at these upcoming shows. Something's defo been lost in the intervening years. Unfortunately their hell raising days seem to be behind them sad
Hopefully it all goes mental/spinal tap/1970s rock, but I can see it being a typically sedate, professional setup..

#1375 Re: Guns N' Roses » Official Statement coming from Guns camp tonight. » 566 weeks ago

Will wrote:
Smoking Guns wrote:

Hey Nightrain….

In what should hopefully be exciting news for you, we have worked with Coachella to set aside a quantity of tickets earmarked for Nightrain members ONLY.

Not the announcement I was hoping for as I'm thousands of miles away from Coachella and doubt I'll be attending, but still very cool of them to make this available for fan club members 22 Hope they will do something similiar when GNR heads to the UK


What Will said.
They'll need to reopen registration for Nightrain if they're going to continue this pre-sale idea on tickets..
Over here, I actually don't think it might be necessary to have tickets set aside for fans online. Unless they're doing small venues, I can't imagine the demand being so great that I'd need access to those pre-sale..??

(Fwiw - I had to sign up to Adele's website to try & get pre-sale tickets to one of her 2 Belfast shows. The demand for these gigs saw the website crash. I just can't see the reunion capturing the imagination to the same extent where tickets will be like gold dust.. Assuming they're coming over here of course..)

#1376 Re: The Sunset Strip » Making a Murderer » 566 weeks ago

So I stayed up watching this last night.

Late this morning. & really tired & in rotten form.

Good show.
Not as good as the jinx tho.
I'm a sucker for these kinda shows. Love them.

#1377 Re: Guns N' Roses » Official Statement coming from Guns camp tonight. » 566 weeks ago

It's the album/GH2 + Slash/Duff.. wink

While it'd have been nice to just dump all the shit on the Kimmel show, this is actually a p neat way of doing it, & keeps it closer to the fans really.

#1378 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 566 weeks ago

apex-twin wrote:
johndivney wrote:

Even so, I fail to see how having an altercation with Sorum should stop him from appearing on a to show to promote a gig??

Matt called him out on being out of shape. Axl canceled Kimmel and went ballistic on Matt in the process.

Maybe.

16

I can actually see that as being true!

#1379 Re: Guns N' Roses » Official Statement coming from Guns camp tonight. » 566 weeks ago

Well I think the fact of it is, GnR are a pop band tbh.. They bring in Joe public. Not just hardcores, not just hard rock fans.
The last time I went to see them, 08 or 09, I was amazed at the people I knew from home who were at the gig. People I'd never associate with GnR in a million years - people who are there for the hits. Only one of my mates came to the gig with me, everyone else had dropped off somewhere around '06 - you all know how it is yourselves, how many hardcores dropped their interest & yet the band were still able to rope in the punters, the average joes who are just going to the gig & not invested in the personnel or the story behind the scenes.
Guns hit that popularity & sometimes I think it's hard for us to see or remember just what a phenomenal sorta band they are, that they can attract all these different types of people. Honestly, out of all the gigs I've been too I've never seen a crowd as varied as those I see at GnR gigs. They attract folks from all walks: families, old rockers, kids, punks, hard rockers

#1380 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 566 weeks ago

buzzsaw wrote:

Go on....

I don't know details. I've heard rumblings that Matt and Axl had an incident. Don't know what or when exactly, but it seems to be tied to the Kimmel thing. What I don't know either is if Matt was out and it created the incident or if Matt is out because of the incident, but either way I would assume Matt is out. Completely I would guess.


Even so, I fail to see how having an altercation with Sorum should stop him from appearing on a to show to promote a gig?? The only things I can come up with are: Sorum gave him a shiner, a lawsuit or just upset his mood..?? None of these things should necessarily be enough cause to cancel a tv spot??

I don't quite see how any Matt incident should be tied to the Kimmel thing? Except that it shook the big man to such an extent.. But even that I have a hard time accepting..??

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB