You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1761 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Grammys » 717 weeks ago

JWIII is God.

but yea compared to that crappy black keys album & that one fun. song u don't hear blunderbuss on the wireless. oh well.

#1762 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR headlining Governor's Ball » 717 weeks ago

hipsters tend to like kings of leon.
they don't like axl or gnr.
it's how they've been trained.

#1763 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNR headlining Governor's Ball » 717 weeks ago

on one hand the whingers have a point - why let one bad apple spoil the whole damn bunch, right?
on the other hand, what a bunch of spoiled rich white kids.

when i first read this i was pissed off. then i was pissed off at GnR fans. how come none of us/them/you guys are willing to defend them. GnR fans should be writing to the festival organisers congratulating them on putting GnR on the bill.  GnR fans should be out in force defending their band instead of letting little shitbags get away w/this crap!

#1764 Re: Guns N' Roses » Judge officially dismisses Activision lawsuit » 717 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

(A) Axl has at all times worked diligently to maintain the artistic integrity of the band by choosing with great care which properties to license Guns N' Roses songs to and refusing to participate in what he believed were potentially embarrassing projects. (B) He has fought to avoid the release of material that does not live up to the highest of standards demanded by the band's history and it's followers. (C) Axl chose not to respond through the media while taking the high road in the face of Slash and Duff's attacks. Hudson and McKagan, by contrast, have told ever changing - and false - stories regarding the formation of the band and its history and (D) believe that the band's catalogue should be exploited without careful consideration - for the Guns N' Roses brand and their loyal audience - or Axl's input as if it were fast food by anyone willing to pay for it.


dunno how sincere this post is meant to be taken but just a few notes on these points:
(A) he doesn't release shit out of spite, not integrity. tho his level of spite is actually perversely admirable, much more so than anything integrity ever got him or anyone fwiw.
& he does license to some dodgy stuff. big daddy is a funny show but it's some guy pissing on a wall while GnR play two versions of SCoM. & he seems to have a bit of a hard on for crappy ridley scott films - i actually haven't seen that body of lies one, it just looked so bad, in fact i think russ is the only person ive ever known who has mentioned it & he prob only bought it to have hd quality ITW..
(B) explain for me then OMG, Shacklers, CITR or Scrapped?
(C) axl's high road is all the weed he smokes. it's given him the mickey mouse voice & just made him even more paranoid than before.
(D) dunno about that. jeez i see american sports on tv & they use like 4 seconds of Jungle on a timeout break. yea slash was EVERYWHERE there a few yrs back (maybe i'd have more of an issue w/him doing the black eyed fuckin peas/fergie if he had actually still been in GnR) & i can see how that stuff could damage the credibility of GnR. but even still those appearances have their benefit for increasing the exposure of the brand in the long term, they do make some kind of sense.
& besides what's the rewards for axl's behaviour, the net result of his approach is we get nothing. it doesn't have to be all or nothing & @ this stage i'd be interested to see what the others would do if they had the power...

#1765 Re: The Garden » The Grand Theft Auto V Thread (Release Date Announced!) » 717 weeks ago

yea the first half of the yr is fucking crap now
'13 is gonna be such a shitty fucking yr if it continues this way
at least u guys might get new console/s by yrs end we wont see ps4 til '14 which is like living back in the early '90s when shit wouldnt get european localisation til like centuries later

#1766 Re: Guns N' Roses » BUMBLEFOOT Says Waiting For A New GUNS N' ROSES Album To Get Done Is ' » 717 weeks ago

to be fair to ron it's gotta be embarrassing trying to answer these questions by this stage. it is some BS but at the very least it's not the inane jibber jabber of ashba.

he obv doesn't feel it's his place to give specifics as to why there's no movement (on anything). it'd be nice for him to have mor to talk to gnr fans about but sure what can you do.. it's not exactly his fault y'know?? (it's axl's fault!)


i do disagree w/him regarding albums.
it may well be that abandoning the traditional album format might be the best thing for axl/gnr. but it's not for me. the album still has a special place. like especially when i'm stoned.
the excuse that it's too much hard work doesn't wash either. it's not been exactly easy getting live shows released, there's nothing to suggest releasing individual songs would be the easier route/or worthwhile for that matter.
but maybe give it a go. at this stage it's really give fuckin anything a go. the ethos seems to be don't just do something, sit around instead..

#1767 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Vs. The Beatles » 720 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
johndivney wrote:

the beatles started out as a badass rock n roll band.

I think you're confusing them with the Rolling Stones, they were a badass rock n roll band.


no. i'm not. i know my stones' history too. they mirrored the beatles path by starting w/blues covers, but w/o having to cut their teeth in the likes of hamburg.
the stones had a much easier ride having only to endure hipsters of london whereas the beatles toughed their way out of true rock n roll dives like liverpool & hamburg.
the early beatles, even pre-PPM Beatles were raunchy, sleazy & hard as fuck in a way the stones could only ever dream of being.

#1768 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Vs. The Beatles » 720 weeks ago

yea & i'd love to see Axl do Money as good as John..

#1769 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Vs. The Beatles » 720 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:
metallex78 wrote:

This is what I have to say about the Beatles... yeah, they're good, but they started as a pop vocal group, kinda like a boy band (Nsync, Backdoor Boys... LOL). It's only as they went on, they got some cred about them musically.

Started as a boy band?  OMG, you need some music history lessons.

I know the Beatles history, I'm just making comparisons. And that's exactly what they started as - a boy band (for their time) pop group for the girls to go crazy over.


what?!


the beatles started out as a badass rock n roll band.
then they wrote the greatest pop songs ever.
then they wrote the greatest rock catalogue ever.

#1770 The Sunset Strip » The Following » 720 weeks ago

johndivney
Replies: 30

currently d/ling this. wondering if any of you have seen it?

reads a little like Fox does Dexter but since it's only the pilot thought i'd give it a go..

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB