You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1771 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNRevolution Exclusive! Classic Rock Feb Mag Cover! » 919 weeks ago
or its not BH at all and we're looking at an 04-06 recording
Possible, although my gut feeling is that it's BH on this track which makes it 03. Having said that if Better was pieced together from different jams like some think I suppose it's possible Better as a song was constructed in the period your suggesting and one of BH's solos was just fitted in there even though he'd long since left GNR.
Whatever the true scenario though it does confirm Better is a newer track than a lot of the other material we have heard. Axl talked of 'big guns' before this song even existed which means the band was writing new songs since 02 and not just tinkering with the same old tracks, and not just new songs but good new songs. Who knows what else they've managed to write in the last 3-4 years? Sorry, If the World? Both tracks were only mentioned in the last 2 years.
#1772 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNRevolution Exclusive! Classic Rock Feb Mag Cover! » 919 weeks ago
Thanks Neemo
Don't know what to make of the whole HTGTH/Beta side of it, very strange, it seems like there's been a breakdown in communication somewhere because clearly Beta doesn't apparently have an issue with CR and is happy to talk to them, yet Jarmo and Mysteron are doing everything they can to discredit CR and it's article. Bizarre.
Interesting stuff about Zutaut as well, it seems the suspicion that Better was a newer song was correct. Assuming it's BH on the track it fairly firmly dates the track to 03.
#1773 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNRevolution Exclusive! Classic Rock Feb Mag Cover! » 919 weeks ago
A response...
Mysteron wrote:As far as I am aware, alot of the work for CD took place in the last few years, post the Zutaut era. That makes the Classic Rock article nothing more than tabloid blood for the gossip vampires.
Interesting. Possibly a bit of damage limitation on GNR's part there but it wouldn't surprise me if this was true. The whole GNR circus was obviously completely out of control back in 01/02, Axl unsure where to take things creatively, people pulling him left and right to make sure they got their slice of the pie etc. Whilst I'm sure some of those people are still around I think the newest era of GNR activity (06 onwards) was a sign Axl had a bit more control of things. He said himself in 01/02 the band was pushed around and made commitments in terms of tours that he wasn't really ready for, in 06 he was obviously in a much better frame of mind. It's possible things began to change in 04 when he took control of producing the album, but of course BH leaving threw a major spanner in the works which delayed any chance of major progress.
You'll notice Mysteron or anyone else hasn't said this is false, instead he takes a shot at anyone who wishes to talk about it, the first real detailed info about behind the scenes of CD, like the fans won't want to talk about it. All the work in the world can have been done since these loony times but whilst the same songs get mentioned now as the ones back then it makes this article relevent. The CR article is a small portion of the CD saga from someone who witnessed it firsthand, if people don't like it being known what went on perhaps someone should have put a stop to it at the time. As I said it's only a small portion of the CD tale, hopefully Beta's parting comment is right and one day Axl will tell his story.
I can see now why HTGTH distanced themselves from the CR news last month, they obviously knew this was coming.
#1774 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNRevolution Exclusive! Classic Rock Feb Mag Cover! » 919 weeks ago
If those studio walls could talk....
#1775 Re: Guns N' Roses » GNRevolution Exclusive! Classic Rock Feb Mag Cover! » 919 weeks ago
Awesome Neemo
I'll definately be buying this.
#1776 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Silence is Deafening » 920 weeks ago
Neemo wrote:mitchejw wrote:Seriously...is there anything more annoying that interviewing someone who won't answer questions about anything interesting?
gotta feel sorry for the guy...he loves communicating and interacting with the fans but his hands are tied when it comes to GnR...as he said before its not his place to discuss the album
Which, as much of a die hard GNR fan that I am, I must admit is VERY sad that the (co) LEAD GUITARIST of the band can't talk about the album.
It's ridiculous but not really Rons fault.
Having said that various people including band members and Merck have said they can talk about the album they just choose not to out of respect or to ruin the surprise. The only confidentiality thing they've got is something to do with not discussing each others personal business or something like that. Not sure I buy it, but that's what various sources have said at different times.
#1777 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Silence is Deafening » 920 weeks ago
I just don't get it.
I mean things have been done for a long time now. 9 or so months.
What could be the holdup? I don't think Axl is stalling, but seriously. We're almost a year from "recording is done" announcement, and 3+ from the "Axl on Angel Down" post.
The Axl on Angel Down statement was made in August, making it over 5 months since GNR's last official update on their website.
#1778 Re: The Sunset Strip » Title of new James Bond film revealed » 920 weeks ago
Daniel Craig is two weeks into the shoot of Quantum Of Solace when we meet him on set at Pinewood Studios. He's back into the non-stop schedule of a Bond movie. We've already seen some early footage of Craig swinging around one of the newly built sets on a high wire. But today he is composed and comfortable. He even smiles as he dons his latest Italian silk.
Q: Good to be back in the designer suits?
DC: I never got out... It's nice to be back in general.
Q: What does title of the film - Quantum Of Solace - mean to you?
DC: We talked long and hard about it. We could have gone for a snappier title, but that wasn't really part of the deal. We wanted to suggest something that was part of where he (Bond) was when we left him at the end of the movie. There's a short story that this comes from: Ian Fleming says that if there's no quantum of solace left in your relationship, it's over. And that's where he was at the end of the movie. He didn't get any. And he doesn't have that level of comfort in himself, the answers to his questions: Who killed his girlfriend? Who's responsible as far as her death's concerned? But also who is head of the organisation that he wants to go looking for. So there's an element of revenge there, which tidies up, but also luckily enough, it implies something very important in the plot as well, there's a tie in, so it's not just some random name that we plucked out of the air. Believe me, we worked quite hard on the name.
Q: What's different about this one so far?
DC: Well look, we've got a new director who's taking the movie, as far as I'm concerned, to a very good place. We've got a new art director, who's making the movie look very different. Every time we do one of these films, we're spending a lot of money to put something on the screen and it should be the best we can make it. Getting Mark Forster involved was part of that process. The emotion we got with the last movie we want to put into this, but we also realise that this has to be a huge action movie. And that has to tie in with the story, and we have to top it. We have to top it and that's all I have to say!
Q: More Gadgets this time?
DC: Maybe a few, but not many. They're part of the story - the world's full of gadgets. Reinventing gadgets in this movie I just don't think is interesting. What gadgets we have are in the plot, and they drive the story along.
Q: And the car?
DC: The car's still there, yeah, that's the best gadget.
Q: Does the character arc continue in this one?
DC: Yes, I think so. I mean I'm not looking to find a conclusion, but we're certainly getting to a better place. He's applying his emotions into his professional life which probably isn't always the right thing to do. His emotion drives him, and his anger drives him, and his passion drives him, and I think that's interesting. So I am gonna apply that in this one and, luckily, we have a great script. But that doesn't mean it's going to be any less of a Bond movie than the last one, in fact I think it's more of a Bond movie, and maybe more of a classical Bond movie than the last one was.
Q: Why is it more of a classical Bond movie?
DC: because of the way we're making it look. There is a touch of Ken Adam in there, a touch of the sixties' classic spy movies. But you know, we're being subtle. There's no big, broad brush strokes here.
Q: Is this going to be a more mature Bond?
DC: He probably misbehaves more in this one than the last one. He's mature, at times. But not all the time.
Q: Dan Bradley (Second unit Director and Bourne franchise stunt coordinator) is on this, is that an indication this movie is going to get even more Bourne-like?
DC: Did you think it was Bourne-like before? Dan's here to do exactly what he's good at doing. He's just come of Indiana Jones so you might as well ask if we're going to be more Indiana Jones-like. I'm certainly not going to get into a pissing competition with the Bourne franchise. We're making a Bond movie.
Q: You were battered and bruised a fair amount in the last movie. We've been told there's twice as much action in this?
DC: Twice as much action!? Someone's got to be writing these figures down! There's a ton more action. It's beginning to be more physical than it was before. We've got a ton more action. I got involved last time and they seem to think I can do it now so I'm at it again. Like I said before, if it doesn't hurt you're not doing it right.
Q: so you've never looked at a page on the script and thought that it might be too much?
DC: I don't read those bits! I only read the lines, I leave the rest because otherwise I realise (Laughs)! No, that's not true. We planned it out and I've been rehearsing since before Christmas. You just have to hit the ground running with it...
Q. Tell us about your preparation.
DC: Before Christmas I was doing about five days a week in the gym. But then, that would be in the evenings and then two months before Christmas I was here every day weapons training, rehearsing, script discussions, talking with the director, doing things that you do when you're planning to do a movie this size. I mean, preparing as much as possible because once you start you can't stop.
Q: There was a great response to Casino Royale. Is there even more pressure this time round?
DC: Definitely. This one's going to be as good if not better, that's really the bottom line. What I'm not doing is looking back. We've done it there, we've done Casino Royale, I couldn't be prouder. We've now got to make another. And that's really all there is to it.
#1779 Re: The Sunset Strip » 'Scream Queen' Debbie Rochon To Give Her Brain To Fans » 920 weeks ago
'Scream Queen' Debbie Rochon To Give Her Brain To Fans
Bikini BloodbathVeteran horror film actress Debbie Rochon has agreed to give loyal fans a piece of herself - by offering them part of her brain. The Bikini Bloodbath star recently announced she was undergoing surgery to remove a brain tumor - and was shocked after fans asked to keep the cancerous growth.
She says, "At first, I thought it was a joke. But after dozens of requests, I decided to give them what they want. I've gotten a lot of weird requests over the years, but this is by far the freakiest and darkest of them all."
Cool, she got my email
#1780 Re: The Garden » What are you like? » 920 weeks ago
I am a Big Thinker...apparently