You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#191 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
Credit to D... from MYGNR he messaged Beltrami about these songs.
As promised, update. Mr Marco Beltrami was kind enough to answer me (love him, became a fan in 2003 with his score for Terminator 3, was amazed Axl hired him when I learnt about it years later). Here is his answer:
"Hi Guillaume,
wow, you really are racking my brain here because it was so long ago, but this is what I remember:
I was hired to do orchestration/arranging for 8 songs. I believe only a few were released on the album that came out a while ago.
every song was distinct. any connection between songs I was not aware of at the time, so yes they were all separate orchestrations.
yes, I remember a song called “seven” was my favorite but maybe its changed or evolved since then?? I could be wrong, but the two you list here sound a bit reworked from what I remember.
sorry i can’t be more helpful
marco"
I asked him another set of question to fully confirm if Soul Monster is Monsters, hope he will answer.
But I think we could almost already assume The General, and Monsters, were not connected originally.
Almost 100% sure Monsters=Soul Monster now.
Edited 1 minute ago by D..
#192 Re: GN'R Downloads » My souncloud mix thread » 88 weeks ago
Always loved this jam. They played it a few times back in the day.
#193 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
Just random musings, not read the whole thread.
From O Globo, Axl interview, Jan 2001
"With 18 songs, the group's next album (they haven't released anything since 1993's "The Spaghetti Incident?") is a collection of songs, which in Axl's opinion are as good as "November Rain". Among them "Madagascar", included in the show on Sunday. The CD will include a tribute to John Lennon and another about child abuse"
So I'm guessing Monsters/Soul Monster(?) was written pre 2001
Also, could Elvis and the Monster of Soul be Me and my Elvis, and Soul Monster as one song. I don't know if that works
I'd say The General is the one about child abuse. I always thought it didn't have vocals at that time because when Belltrami worked on it in October of 02 it was an instrumental, but the song being about abuse & being mentioned in January of 01 suggests that it may have had lyrics at that point after all.
Maybe he just had not recorded them yet, or maybe they were already done and he just chose to take the instrumentals to Beltrami. Either way this points to the song existing in the year 2000, which is 2 years earlier than we had proof of before.
#194 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
I think there is a lack of creativity by Axl at the moment. The powerful bullets were used un CD and now... I want to have ALL, leftovers included. But a new material álbum i hope It would be more creative and had better songs.
The combination of the three, add Izzy contributions and there we'll find the Big guns and the Magic
I want them too but I want everything lol. All versions of all songs. I mean if you line up the cell clip with that Monsters leak the differences are huge. There are structure changes and along with the guitars being different parts like the drum roll before the heavy section have been removed completely.
#195 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
But if they are different and separated songs, are they going to release both? The vynil had a B side and was for the general. Then i understood the general was renamed as the general and Monsters and now two different songs...?
I think the real response at the moment is we don't know for certain.
They both have Beltrami work on from the tour intro (that we do know). That could mean they were once one song that has now been split into two, or it could also mean they were always two songs and that they just combined the strings to play as an intro to those gigs back in the day. Now obviously when asked years back what that intro was they said it was The General, they never mentioned Monsters so that would maybe suggest the song was later split after all.
The credits have it registered as The General And Monsters which would imply that they are one song though, but then the 7" is advertised as having The General as a B-Side with no mention of Monsters at all.
So who knows for sure? It's all conflicting hints.
I still would not be surprised if when this 7" appears it doesn't have Monsters on at all. Like I said it's not advertised.
I said this the other day but I think the things the fanbase thought they knew for sure (eg. Me and my Elvis being Soulmonster) actually aren't sure at all.
#196 Re: The Garden » Cooking » 88 weeks ago
Iv'e moved onto chicken breasts for grilled chicken wraps, curry ect as i'm trying to get in shape again. Thighs have a lot more flavour though for sure. Making up for it with a lot of different spice's though. I'd forgotten it's possible to eat healthy and for it to actually be nice.
#197 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
Sky Dog wrote:It’s 2 songs imo….subject matter is completely different….General is about child abuse and Monsters is about Seymour….again, just my opinion.
I agree.
They may link them for whatever reason but they were clearly two different songs at some point.
I don't know how anyone watches any of that GNR YouTube content. Pure garbage. You couldn't pay me to watch it.
I'd actually prefer it not be promoted here.
Stuff like shackler's SoundCloud/YouTube channel is perfectly fine or other Evo member accounts but the stuff like mentioned above is pure hogwash.
Thanks man. I mean people can obviously get things wrong of course, I got most of the lyrics wrong for example (Although I at least got the word monsters) but there are youtube channels of people out there doing commentary that just seems way off base.
#198 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
dave-gnfnr wrote:https://www.youtube.com/live/lF8QH3kSTM … OduXhpSh72
The jib guy is a clown, he puts out so much misinfo but rick is on this
If it's a rick thing, then i guess we know when these are from.
I think he would like people to think that. That Jib channel is full of BS. I think he got a lot of mileage out of that Atlas EP thing with the AI cover. I wouldn't be surprised if he was the one who posted it on 4chan to generate content in the first place.
#199 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
Shacklermyrye wrote:Anyone who finds this version don't go thinking it's a another version because the song length's are different. Whoever put them together has renamed The General as Monsters and vice versa lol
https://i.postimg.cc/Hk7T9swC/Screenshot-79.pngThen they are going to release the two songs? The General+Monsters separated
No idea.
#200 Re: Guns N' Roses » The General and Monsters » 88 weeks ago
Anyone who finds this version don't go thinking it's a another version because the song length's are different. Whoever put them together has renamed The General as Monsters and vice versa lol