You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#5071 Guns N' Roses » WHAT? why now? » 863 weeks ago

mitchejw
Replies: 2

sorry if this is in the wrong subjecty


but apperently my alma matta has played my GN'R song...the song I suggested back in 2006...I've graduated now

Axl...I hope you like the opener

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mN241_k7Loc

#5072 Re: The Garden » Being a Bears fan: My personal hell » 863 weeks ago

PaSnow wrote:
mitchejw wrote:

the list goes on and on...

Cade McKnown.


I'm just sayin'

I feel like giving you negative karma for that...

it's not like we haven't tried to find decent QB
that's all i'm sayin'

#5073 Re: The Garden » Being a Bears fan: My personal hell » 863 weeks ago

I know I have a skewed view of what a good QB is...but we can't seem to find any...

Do you remember?

Rick Mirer
Steve Stenstrom
Kordell Stewart
Jim Miller
Shane Matthews
Steve Walsh
Jonathon Quinn
Craig Krenzel
Moses Mareno
Will Furrer
Peter Tom Willis
Chad Hutchinson
Henry Burris


the list goes on and on...

the truth is...they will NOT spend money on offensive players...the team refuses to do so

#5074 The Garden » Being a Bears fan: My personal hell » 863 weeks ago

mitchejw
Replies: 13

So here's the thing, guy...

I'm a Chicago Bears fan...no really, I am. After what you read here you might not think so...but I really am.

I have been a Chicago Bears fan since I could understand what football was. I didn't understand pass interference, (even to this day, I take issue with it) nor did I understand shotgun formation from a basic I-form.

After the Cardinals forgot to show up last Sunday and put up a fight against the Vikings, my team is about as close to being eliminated as it possibly can be. Although, if there is a team out there in the NFL that could fuck up something almost guaranteed, it would be the Minnesota Vikings.

So in 1992, I believe I was 9 or 10, my first Bears season came to my attention. I hardly understood anything. From what I did understand though, is that from 1984-1992, the Bears were perennial playoff contenders. I remember watching the Bears play the Lions in 1992 in a game that was to decide the division title (funny how things change). I can't remember if it was Dave Krieg or Scott Mitchell or Rodney Peete. Whomever it was, The Bears fell to the Detroit Lions in 1992 and eventually wound up losing the division to a 12-4 Detroit Lions team.

But the Bears were 11-5, and they did make the playoffs...but who were they matched up against? The first playoff team that included Emmitt Smith, Troy Aikman, Micheal Irvin and all the rest of the 'boys.

The Bears lost that game 17-13 via a goal line stand by Dallas. It ended an era of football prosperity in Chicago that had spanned nearly a decade. Year in and year out they were in the playoffs and had a habit of going quite deep into those playoffs.

My story starts in 1992.

A tumultuous road from there on after was indeed in store for me. Ditka was fired after a 5-11 1993 campaign (of course beating up Jim Harbaugh on the sidelines had something to do with it).

The Dave Wanndsteidt (I don't care if it's spelled wrong, he deserves it) years were filled with crap team after crap team. The defense was horrid and the offense was the best the Bears had seen since the days of Sid Luckman (of course great offense by Bears fan standards is suspect to say the least). Erik Kramer to Curtis Conway became the weekly combo, and when they weren't connecting, Bobby Engram and Jeff Graham were picking up the slack.

Unfortunately this new team made for many 28-27 losses, or sometimes 35-31 loses if we were lucky. Wanny was here and gone without one playoff memory worth saving. There was that wonderful 48-14 tromping in 1995 or 96 against the 49ers in the divisional round of the playoffs. 9-7 was Wanny's highest mark here in Chicago, that was back in the days where 9-7 meant something.

So how does all of this relate to what's going on now with the Chicago Bears?

I'll gladly tell you. The Bears seem to be most successful when they are the outstanding defense and mediocre offensive team. They thrust away offensive gems consistently and cling to offensive liabilities. Go away Curtis Conway, go away Bobby Engram, shew Brenard Berrian, I never knew you anyway Muhsin Muhammid...I love you David Terrel, big contract for you, Marcus Robinson get the hell outta here (and have career years with Minnesota)...get out of here 100 catch Marty Booker, we'll catch you again when you're 33...

and the most relevant to the modern day Bears...Berrian with a 95+ yard TD pass against the Bears to probably eliminate the Chicago Bears from division championship contention.

Although we are most successful when we have a great defense and a mediocre offense, that hardly makes us a successful team as of late. The Superbowl losing team of just 2 years ago seems a hundred years ago. With every Rashied Davis (our supposed #1) drop to strengthen his lead for dropped passed in a season and every Brandon Lloyd sure reception that he somehow turns the wrong way for...I have to keep remininding myself that somehow...this IS Bears football...the only way we know how to play.

Is it purgatory or is it hell?

You decide.

#5075 Re: The Garden » Shoes Thrown At Bush » 863 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

Yeah, funny thing is most Americans and the rest of the world didn't even notice.

That's how much we care. Not trying to be an asshole, but the only ones keeping score of their "insults" are them.

Did anyone notice that Iraqi Prime Minster (guessing?) next to Bush, tried to slap the second one out of the way?

What is the implication here...that no one cares how the common Iraqi people think because the big bad western world has the biggest balls of them all?

#5077 Re: Guns N' Roses » Gene Simmons lashes out at Axl Rose » 865 weeks ago

Wow...I really respect Gene's business talent...but not his musical talent...

"I wanna rock and roll all night...and party every day"...I think they say that about 27 times in that song

#5078 Re: Guns N' Roses » 8 reasons why Chinese Democracy stiffed » 865 weeks ago

wow smoking guns...go back an listen to your nickelback then...they're pretty sweet...


right?

#5079 Re: Guns N' Roses » Interesting read on Chinese Democracy (from their myspace) » 865 weeks ago

ereeper wrote:

It depends on how you define success.  I think it's a success because I like the entire album.  Now is it a financial and commercial success?  Not yet.  A good point was brought up that AFD didn't fly off the shelves that first week either.  There is still time for it to be accepted by the masses.  You can call me a fool or naive, but good music and good art will be appreciated over the test of time.  The album hasn't even been out two weeks yet and a lot of the Henny Pennies are claiming the sky is falling.  Now the album hasn't won the lotto, but it's not at rock bottom either.  Let's give this thing four more weeks and see what we know by then.

I can accept that, I really can. At least your not just telling me I'm and unhappy, miserable person.

And to be honest...I go back and forth on whether or not I wanted Axl out there whoring himself out the mass media by doing Gene Simmions-esque things.

I am grateful for these past couple of weeks.

#5080 Re: Guns N' Roses » What did you expect? » 865 weeks ago

I whole heartidly agree with the above statement. I did expect something to change. I don't know that I had a clear idea of what it was that I wanted to changed...but I thought I would see something...ANYTHING!

Believe me, it's not that I don't appreciate the album...I do! I just feel as though part of this experience has been ruined because as some people put it..."Axl doesn't owe us anything."

I truly do not understand what that means. I cannot honestly fathom your logic, here. I guess nobody really owes you anything. Your parents don't really owe you a proper upbringing, the government doesn't owe you a bailout, your friend doesn't owe you any of that money back that you lent him.

I guess when it comes right down to it...no one owes anyone anything.

I didn't fucking follow this band for 10+ years (mind you 5 years after they imploded the first time) to "get told to go home" as Axl himself once put it when he went to England.

Axl can ignore his fans all he wants, and take them for granted all he wants...because we obviously keep coming back. The reason I've stuck around for so long is because there was a time when even when he disrespected the fans, he still came through in some way.

It's been a long time since he's really come through in that way. In 2002, he just packed up and went home without any explination...in 2006 he toured again promising the album (cancelling the show in Milwaukee I was to attend)...and now in 2008 with the release of the actual album, it appears that I will be robbed of my retribution for a third time.

Like I said, I am thankful for the album...I truly am...but...well...

I guess Axl doesn't owe me (or you) anything...I guess I can take solice in that?!

FUCK!

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB