You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
One poll of note up there. Gravis, which leans pretty solidly toward GOP, has Trump's lead at 4 points in S.C. Shockingly close considering the poll's bias.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
If you are going to point out GOP bias you should do the same for DNC. Most of the polls over sample Democrats.
Clinton leads Trump by 8-points– in poll that interviewed 16% more Democrats
Ipsos are supposedly A rated.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
If you are going to point out GOP bias you should do the same for DNC. Most of the polls over sample Democrats.
Well it's really only newsworthy when the poll goes against the bias or is in a state that contradicts bias or has a huge bias, but here ya go.
YouGov, +1.6 to Dems, closing recent Iowa, Ohio gap.
Gravis, +1.1 to GOP, making S.C. very close and erasing Trump's lead in N.C.
CBS, +.6 to Dems
Rasmussen, +2.0 to GOP, gives a bigger national lead to Hillary
PEW, +.6 to DEM
CVOTER International, +.3 to GOP
Quinnipiac, +.7 to GOP
PPP, +.2 to GOP, making Texas closer than 6 points, in Trump's favor
Washington Post, +.6 to Dems
L.A. Times, +.6 to GOP, closes that Trump lead
Mitchell, +.1 to GOP
Opinion Savvy, +.7 to Dems
Zogby, +.8 to GOP
Suffolk, +.7 to Dems
Monmouth, +.6 to Dems, makes Trump's lead in Ind. bigger
Ipsos, +.1 to Dems
All this poster stuff can be found here http://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/. It's really helping when looking at polls.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
You are a stupid motherfucker. I am an expert in the field. My experience speaks loudly for itself. Expert. Let that sink in a bit...people rely on my expertise. Schools that educate people rely on my expertise. Professionals make multiple times your salary rely on my expertise. Multiple fortune 100 Companies rely on my expertise. And you're going to say I am wrong because you say so? Not a chance son, not a chance.
HAHAHAHAHA oh man...
http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/201 … -not-coun/
http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterferrar … e45bf3d23e
http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nat … 8_ST_N.htm
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter … ower-fina/
Let me know if you need more evidence of something almost anyone that's been paying attention already knew ID. Job market nowhere near as good as you seem to think it is. Apology will be accepted.
you quoted Forbes as a legit publication? HAHAHAHAHAHA! politifact is exactly what I quoted you and you said they were liars with rigged numbers!! Hilarious. I spoon fed you this stuff. After you just got done saying the press doesn't tell the truth you're quoting... The press? Too funny. Again, so you understand, things got better under Obama. Sorry.
You gave presentations.... Whoopdee-friggin-doo. What does that even mean? Literally millions of people give job presentations, my sister does for Berkshire Hathaway, she prepares them for Vanderbilt. So I guess that makes her an expert on everything. She also hires too...and everyone within that corporate space have VASTLY different opinions on things. Your expert credentials are laughable.
The fact you made this all about yourself says everything. Sorry, James, I won't play into his crap no mo.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
If you are going to point out GOP bias you should do the same for DNC. Most of the polls over sample Democrats.
Clinton leads Trump by 8-points– in poll that interviewed 16% more Democrats
Ipsos are supposedly A rated.
Ipsos bias is negligible at .1 to Dems.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
Trump ahead by 7 in Alaska.
http://www.adn.com/politics/2016/08/21/ … ird-party/
Pollster leans to Dems by 1.3, gets C grade from Nate Silver.
Even adding in the bias, it's closer than it should be for Trump.
Better yet, Gary Johnson got 16%.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
Can I just say those naked Trump statues are completely stupid. I thought body shaming was bad? It's like when that female Trump supporter was assaulted by an entire group of Mexican protestors. She was spit on, cursed at and had flag poles and Mexican flags shoved in her face... On live TV ...and liberals said nothing. They were too busy reporting on Amber Heard.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
Can I just say those naked Trump statues are completely stupid. I thought body shaming was bad? It's like when that female Trump supporter was assaulted by an entire group of Mexican protestors. She was spit on, cursed at and had flag poles and Mexican flags shoved in her face... On live TV ...and liberals said nothing. They were too busy reporting on Amber Heard.
Not nothing, necessarily.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
misterID wrote:Can I just say those naked Trump statues are completely stupid. I thought body shaming was bad? It's like when that female Trump supporter was assaulted by an entire group of Mexican protestors. She was spit on, cursed at and had flag poles and Mexican flags shoved in her face... On live TV ...and liberals said nothing. They were too busy reporting on Amber Heard.
Not nothing, necessarily.
+1
Great article. She basically said everything I was thinking. It's not just obnoxious, it's hypocritical. I had no idea Trump supporters were doing the KFC shit with Hillary, but I'm not surprised. I've never seen a group of people openly embrace bigotry, racism and misogyny and then cry when they're called out about it. Follow the leader.
"Anarchist art collective Indecline" oh please. Anyone who uses Anarchist as a self description is an attention whore and a fraud. Especially Tom Morello. Dude talks about sending the rich into the ocean, but he loves his money. Works on a corporate label, and apparently one of the reasons for the Audioslave breakup was...money. Chris didn't want to share songwriting publishing with people who didn't write the songs.
Re: 2016 Presidential Election Thread
polluxlm wrote:If you are going to point out GOP bias you should do the same for DNC. Most of the polls over sample Democrats.
Clinton leads Trump by 8-points– in poll that interviewed 16% more Democrats
Ipsos are supposedly A rated.
Ipsos bias is negligible at .1 to Dems.
That's historical bias.
The poll that is out right now samples 50% more democrats than republicans. In a nation where the two groups are about equal and the GOP had stronger turnout in their primaries, does that seem reasonable? And that's not all, Trump wins among independents by 4 and his own party by 3. Yet all we see is a headline saying Clinton leads by 8.
