You are not logged in. Please register or login.

Tommie
 Rep: 67 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Tommie wrote:

Fluffy Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers
Friday , February 27, 2009

That super-soft toilet paper you're fond of using? It's an ecological disaster, environmentalists say.

Millions of trees are harvested throughout the Americas – including rare old-growth forests in Canada – to sustain the United States’ obsession with quilted, ultra-soft, multi-ply toilet paper, the New York Times reported.

Although toilet paper manufacturers could produce products from recycled materials at a similar cost, the newspaper reported, the fiber taken from standing trees are necessary to help give the tissue its fluffy feel.

“No forest of any kind should be used to make toilet paper,” said Dr. Allen Hershkowitz, a senior scientist and waste expert with the Natural Resource Defense Council told the Times.

The United States is the largest market for toilet paper in the world, the newspaper reported, but tissue from 100 percent recycled fibers makes up less than 2 percent of sales for at-home use among conventional and premium brands. People from other countries throughout Europe and Latin America are far less picky about what they use to wipe.

“This is a product that we use for less than three seconds and the ecological consequences of manufacturing it from trees is enormous,” Hershkowitz told the Guardian newspaper, which cited the chemicals used in pulp manufacturing and process of cutting down forests.

“Future generations are going to look at the way we make toilet paper as one of the greatest excesses of our age," Hershkowitz said. "Making toilet paper from virgin wood is a lot worse than driving Hummers in terms of global warming pollution.”

However, hope is on the horizon, if Hollywood is any indicator. The Times reported the Academy Awards ceremony last weekend used 100 percent recycled toilet paper at the Kodak Theater’s restrooms.


http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,502444,00.html

Neemo
 Rep: 485 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Neemo wrote:

well i'm not gonna stop using shit tickets thats for sure 16

BLS-Pride
 Rep: 212 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

BLS-Pride wrote:

3 Sea shells?

jorge76
 Rep: 59 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

jorge76 wrote:

The forestry industry plants tons of trees.  Otherwise they wouldn't stay in business.  They're not just decimating an area then moving on to a new one.  That arguement has driven me nuts for a long time.

Plus my triple ply feels so damn good.

Olorin
 Rep: 268 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Olorin wrote:

Nothing wrong with using rapid growing soft woods as a sustainable resource, hardwoods take hundreds of years to mature however.

Softwood forestry plantations are practically mono cultures though, planted too close together for other species to compete and biodiversity is reduced.

The rain forests used to be, and probably still  are, felled for toilet roll roll

Disposable nappies are another ecological nightmare.

RussTCB
 Rep: 633 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

RussTCB wrote:

removed

Saikin
 Rep: 109 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Saikin wrote:

As well as all those styrofoam cups we so love.   

You know, recycled toilet paper just sounds so nasty.  I realize it's recycled from other sources but a lot of people are going to think that they are literally taking toilet paper out of the sewers and re-using it. 16

Axlin16
 Rep: 768 

Re: Toilet Paper Said to Be Worse for Environment Than Hummers

Axlin16 wrote:

When do you find the point to say - Fuck the Environment?


I've found it. Mother nature get fucking blow me.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB