You are not logged in. Please register or login.

-D-
 Rep: 231 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

-D- wrote:

Izzy is most important cause it gives Axl a way out of doing any kind of performance, cause he can always point to Izzy not being there and if it isn't gonna be a true reunion, why do it?

that way he isn't completely mangled in the press.

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

monkeychow wrote:

Izzy reunited with Axl already and it was just a footnote in the media.

Slash and Axl would create the fireworks.

Izzy is great and played a huge roll in the songwriting, but in terms of onstage performance of AFD and UYI he wasn't needed in 1992 and he isn't needed now for the general public to be happy with their GNR line up. Only Axl and Slash is required for that.

monkeychow
 Rep: 661 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

monkeychow wrote:

Me personally i'd like Duff there, and Izzy...but yeah to the average punter they want to see the Tokyo dvds.

Bro-mero
 Rep: 23 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Bro-mero wrote:

At this point, playing at RRHOF is highly unlikely and here's why:

1) Izzy and/or Axl not even attending

2) Slash says Axl hates his guts

3) Axl's likely unwillingness to play

4) 15 years of distance between the band

Theirs too many obstacles to overcome in too little amount of time. If Slash could of kept his mouth shut I think scenarios 1, 3, and 4 could be nullified but Slash can't keep his mouth shut and hope for the best

Mikkamakka
 Rep: 217 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Mikkamakka wrote:

Well, so Slash fucked it up. Finally, the truth arrived. Axlism at its best.

Gibbo
 Rep: 191 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Gibbo wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Well, so Slash fucked it up. Finally, the truth arrived. Axlism at its best.

22 Yeah good one slash 14




  gibbo

Intercourse
 Rep: 212 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Intercourse wrote:

Axlamic Fundamentalism ahoy!!

DCK
 Rep: 207 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

DCK wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Well, so Slash fucked it up. Finally, the truth arrived. Axlism at its best.

Why don't you, instead of adding further fuel to the fire, just keep your mouth shut and let it go when people post silly things?

Two wrongs doesn't make a right.

I usually keep my mouth shut 9 out of 10 times when you post silly things, which often happen daily.

Mikkamakka
 Rep: 217 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

Mikkamakka wrote:
DCK wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Well, so Slash fucked it up. Finally, the truth arrived. Axlism at its best.

Why don't you, instead of adding further fuel to the fire, just keep your mouth shut and let it go when people post silly things?

Two wrongs doesn't make a right.

I usually keep my mouth shut 9 out of 10 times when you post silly things, which often happen daily.

Are you kidding? Don't try to be the judge here, when you are making shit up hour by hour. You have problems with the reality, but tolerate and support the la-la-landish comments by your zealot tribe. You should have aimed your words to Bromero - in that cause, you'd have an ounce of credibility. Unfortuately you don't have any. Shut up.

DCK
 Rep: 207 

Re: RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements)

DCK wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:
DCK wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Well, so Slash fucked it up. Finally, the truth arrived. Axlism at its best.

Why don't you, instead of adding further fuel to the fire, just keep your mouth shut and let it go when people post silly things?

Two wrongs doesn't make a right.

I usually keep my mouth shut 9 out of 10 times when you post silly things, which often happen daily.

Are you kidding? Don't try to be the judge here, when you are making shit up hour by hour. You have problems with the reality, but tolerate and support the la-la-landish comments by your zealot tribe. You should have aimed your words to Bromero - in that cause, you'd have an ounce of credibility. Unfortuately you don't have any. Shut up.

Sort of proved my point right there.

Have a nice day.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB