#1 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl’s “ridiculous demands” » 10 weeks ago
#2 Re: Guns N' Roses » Sculpting axl rose » 15 weeks ago
Can't see how they can sell stadiums again just by rolling out the same shit! Casual fans that wanted to see Axl and Slash on stage again now have. Not sure how many of them will pony up good $$'s again for the same offering.
New music and/or AFD5 tour is the only way forward. That said, new music is no guarantee for success either. Their best shot at success would be with Izzy in the mix working on brand new songs, not tinkering over reheated Chi Dem stuff. Then tour behind that.
But I don't see that happening. They will just dial it in, count whatever dollars come in from more of the same. The cleaners will continue to put out more garbage swag to fatten their own pockets. Rinse and repeat.
I would have thought if they want to keep touring then they will need to do something to refresh the audience and keep them coming, otherwise I imagine numbers would slowly dwindle.
Releasing some new music then starting the whole tour cycle again seems logical. If they don't want to do that then I would suggest an AFD 5 lineup and tour would be an option that would allow them to tour and still keep strong crowd numbers.
That said if I was them I would leave the AFD 5 tour as the ace up my sleeve in the event the public goes cold on GNR again and/or new music flops. This would give them one last substantial bite of the cherry.
I still can’t believe this whole snippet game continues on. Just leak the whole song or fuck off.
This shit has been going on for 15 odd years. I know I’ve grown up and moved on during that time, have these muppets not had one ounce of emotional development during that period?
They’re songs recorded bloody years ago. Share it if u want and I’ll listen to it, but fucken grow up and stop playing games with short clips of songs for bragging or “I have this and you don’t” or whatever the fuck else they get out of it.
They must have pitiful lives.
#10 Re: The Garden » US Politics Thread » 53 weeks ago
Perhaps there are more men bailing because when the woman doesnt want the baby and the responsibility she terminates it before it’s born, thus never needing to bail. The male doesnt get the chance to do that, they can only make the decision to bail after the fact if they can’t convince the woman not to have it.
Don’t get my wrong tho, I don’t think it’s right. if you have a baby then you have a responsibility to look after it in most instances and you should suck it up and do your best to raise and support it.