If old Joe thinks there's any kind of talent in those 3 kids... Uh oh...

Wanna Be Starting Somethin....

PYT?

You know, They Don't Really Care About Us has really grown on me. I think its one of his best.

I don't see Fergie being hidden or buried in the mix. Sorry guys.

^^

His descriptions of Mj's genitals were wrong, though. He was only right about his splottchy skin on his body. These aren't really considered intimate details, mostly because almost all of Mj's body could be described that way.

Sorry, dudette!

My main issue with the book is that it wasn't something he went out and bought, or even part of a personal collection. It was one book sent to him by a fan. And I'm not defending the book, in that, I wouldn't own the thing, but I understand the art value and I don't think everyone who owns one is a pervert or pedophile.

See, defending a lawsuit isn't as easy at it sounds. This takes years and years, with appeal after appeal, summons after summons, mediation after mediation. These things can literally go on for decades. It is easier to settle, no matter how bad it looks. Again, this comes down to a matter of opinion.

And I'm not defending Bill O'Reilly!

As for the last family, its not just her using her kids to shoplift stuff, they had a history of leeching off people, like George Lopez. And they didn't go to the police. They went to the same lawyer who got the first kid a settlement. It was that lawyers psychologist he sent the kid to who went to the police. And I'm sorry, but after hearing about the second boys mother, do you really think she acted like a sane person? Ever? And everyone in the first kids family appears to be shady. I'm not buying that the father was a good guy in this. The only thing I've heard about the mother is the shopping spree. But you can't just say the mother pimped the kid out (for a credit card) and not say the father did as well. Still, imo, there's enough I've read that says this kid wasn't molested.

I'm not saying everyone is lying, but do you really think everyone in the media was fair and unbiased? Didn't the media, including these people, come under scrutiny for how they reported on this? Why did she and others not report on the kid not describing the Mj's genitals correctly? Why didn't they/she report the father being caught on tape or how he got the kid to confess? Do you think its right the DA, Tom Sneddon, has such close relationships with certain people in the media, like Diane Dimond, who he had acompany the raid? That these people deliberately slanted articles against Michael? Do you know that Sneddon was sued for misconduct for prosecuting innocent people and supressing evidence that would have cleared them, including actual cofessions of other suspects, multiple times? Did you know he ignored Santa Barbra and the Los Angeles Police Departments and both the Department of Children and Family Services investigations of Mj when both concluded that complaints of molestation had been untrue? Did you know he personally staked out Michael's home, which DA's are not allowed to do?  Did you know he talked to the second boys mother several times before charges were filed, which isn't exactly legal? Did you know he issued the largest raid in California history and found hardly any evidence, which is why that book was so important to his case?

This is why I'm so angry about the media coverage and what they decide to tell and what they don't.