You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1101 Re: Guns N' Roses » Testing a GNR Fan theory » 787 weeks ago
-D- wrote:exactly.. the personal experience thing is a big part of it for me especially.. As a teenager early adult tryin to figure out life.. going through first experiences such as love,heartbreak,death etc... those songs/albums were the soundtrack.. so I guess at 30 years old... CD just doesn't connect to me anywhere near the level a song like Estranged does.. Now had CD Came out in 2001 when i was going through the biggest tragedy of my life.... I may feel way different about it. cause i did have Madagascar and The Blues during it and those two are still my favorite till this day off that album and consider both amongst the top GNR songs ever.
Right on. People connect to this like it was their parents. That's why the kids fight over who's best when the parents divorce, mommy or daddy or Axl or Slash.
Madagascar, Chinese etc means much more to me than say Right next door to hell or any of those. Estranged means something, but the Chinese songs was there in a specific time, specific life. It's just about connecting. When Mickronson says there's no soul in Estranged, he says it because it's not the old guys playing. If it had been the other way around he would have said the same thing. "Mommys new boyfriend is never as good as my dad".
It's much more about mentality and things outside the actual music than we might think.
In my case it's totally different. I can love an artist's music, without having any (or significant) connection to the lyrics. Well, I prefer meaningful words over stupid cock rock, but I rather take the vocal melody as another instrument, and if it goes right with the music and I find the singer sincere, then it IS for me.
For example my favourite musician of all time, and now my favourite singer, Tori Amos sings about things I have never liver through, often never even witnessed, and I can not really relate to it. Her interviews make me mad sometimes, she's thinking so differently about the world and the people. But her very emotional, well written and unique music speaks to me, and she's the one I listen the most.
Speaking about the who came first would be the idol... well, I like a lot of different guitarists and bands. It's really not about who came first, but who made the band what it is. As much as I wouldn't accept anyone to sing in GN'R, but Axl Rose, I can't accept anyone to play solo guitar there, but Slash. Cause that made Guns N' Roses my favourite band. If Axl Rose and Slash would revive Led Zeppelin, I would be sick, as much as I love them, cause it's Robert and Jimmy (and in that case: JPJ and Bonzo, too).
One other thing about the post-Slash GN'R guitarists... I was very excited when Robin Finck joined the band, cause I, as a huge NIN fan back then, thought that Axl would turn it into industrial, and even though I didn't like his keeping the name, I was excited about the possible music outcome. Then came OMG, which was disappointing, then HOB and RIR 2001, which debuted new songs, I didn't find interesting at all. It was a huge letdown...waiting for half a decade for sub-par songs and a band that cannot even play the old songs well.... I still hate Silkworms and Rhiad, find Madagascar boring, The Blues a UYI C-side and CD a below mediocre song that they made a good one after a decade in the studio and with Bumble's world class rhythm guitar. I honestly don't like the album, CD at all, only TWAT, This I Love, CD, and the vocal melodies of SoD. It would be better for me to like it, cause it's Axl Rose's singing, but it's not... I like a lot of guitarists, and I have never made any attempt to dislike someone or to not like him, but hey, they are not my cup of tea, and I find so disturbing parts in almost each of their 'new' songs that keeps me away from listening it anymore.
#1102 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 787 weeks ago
not totally horrible, it sounds like Estranged but has no soul.
Good performance, great song. I agree that noone can match Slash's playing in Estranged (including his live versions). As much as I like Bumble, who did 150% to save the RIR show, and learnt note by note the solos (unlike DJ), his version is too cold for me. He's a different player, yes, but he's just playing those melodies quite well, while in Slash's case it was coming from his heart. It's the same difference as the Axl vs. Myles performance. One can be technically a better musician, but he wasn't the fountain of the song, only a performer.
(Before anyone would start the 'vocals are more important than the music argument' - no it is not. For you, maybe. But there are just as many famous piano or violin solo players in the history of classical music, than singers. And it's not different when it comes to jazz or rock, which are the most music-orientated kinds of pop music. It's not f.ing 80s disco, when nobody cares who programmes the drum machine.)
#1103 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 787 weeks ago
i choose to base each instance on it's own merits - the same reason i don't block your posts
j/k
everyone lies and everyone tells the truth at times
the fact that axl didn't even care to talk about it or report it until after slash hung himself by running his own mouth and changing his story while was unwaivering says a lot
The Axl camp reported it first, still 6 months after it had happened. Then came Slash's first and second story.
#1104 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 787 weeks ago
I bet both camps won't tell the "whole" truth.
This.
The most interesting thing about the 'Slash visiting Axl's house' episode is that fans forget the most important details.
1. After the visit Slash N' Duff dropped the lawsuit against Axl.
2. After the visit more and more rumours came about a reunion. (Download festival etc.)
3. The reunion is said to fall apart because of Axl Rose trying to trick the others out of old royalties.
3. The Axl camp made the visit public half a year after it had happened.
Do the math.
The who was drunk and who wasn't, who said what to who and when, and everything in Axl's press realease is just random manipulator bullshit.
#1105 Re: Guns N' Roses » Question about Jungle performance where Axl gets hit with beer » 787 weeks ago
Maybe one of these?
#1106 Re: Guns N' Roses » to clear the air » 787 weeks ago
It's been 'nu' since 1999. Had been, at least. Not 'nu' at all now, I agree, cause the 'nu' guys were replaced (except Chris). 'New' will work for you? Post-classic? 

#1107 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Rock in Rio Freefall! » 787 weeks ago
Mikkamakka wrote:KIKO2K wrote:Now he deleted his shitty post.
Yeah, cause I changed my mind and decided to give you more time, before a public judgement. I wouldn't be such a gentleman now.
To clear the situation, I wrote something like
'More and more HTGTH enigmas. I hope they are not on a mission or something'I still hope.
First of all...
Fuck off to call me HTGTH enigma!
Do you know me?!
Who the fuck are you to judge me ?!Thanks to have changed your mind... NOT !!!! What a joke.
You're a bit passionate and you'd better be more civilized. This won't work here.
In the past few days or weeks many people I know (knew) from HTGTH came here. Suddenly. The people who were the biggest Jarmo zealots there. When I saw your name, you were familiar - I thought, 'well, another one from HTGTH'. The place I absolutely hate with its Fuhrer. I made a mistake - I did that post quick. Then I realized I don't have bad memories of you from there, I only remember you as a regular and active member. Therefore I deleted my post. I'm sorry, wasn't quick enough and you read it.
Waiting for your apology though, cause I think you've overreacted at least as much as me.
#1108 Re: Guns N' Roses » to clear the air » 787 weeks ago
When even die-hard nu-band fans, like Russ, Olorin or DCK says Rio was extremely awful, then it was extremely awful. 90% of the posters saw a shockingly bad performance, while 10% saw 'the best show of their lives', a 'great show', or a 'not that bad show with some little mistakes'.
I felt sorry for you, Neemo, cause some of the attacks against you were mean - the only explanation is that the other 'blind and deaf' (sorry
) members are well-known Axl cultist, while you are regarded as an open minded, 'positive realist', honest person. And it seemed that we'd seen such a different show that no wonder people started to speculate.
I came to the conclusion some weeks ago that this band doesn't deserve too much energy, time or passion. I take every little positive thing as a gift, cause there is no need to worry about a middle-aged, crazy and bitter spoiled child's actions and non-actions. He used to be my hero and the time came when I learnt to accept that he is not a person I wanted him to be. Not even on an artistic level. So I expect much less from him (don't care about the band at all, but Bumble is a great guy, almost to a hero level), but this performance was so FUCKIN' BAD that I can't set my expectation that low to even accept this. Even a band that I have never liked would shock me with something like that.
#1109 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Rock in Rio Freefall! » 787 weeks ago
Now he deleted his shitty post.
Yeah, cause I changed my mind and decided to give you more time, before a public judgement. I wouldn't be such a gentleman now.
To clear the situation, I wrote something like
'More and more HTGTH enigmas. I hope they are not on a mission or something'
I still hope.
#1110 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses Rock in Rio Freefall! » 787 weeks ago
Deleted.

