You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#11501 Re: Guns N' Roses » Changes to the tracks you'd like to see: » 941 weeks ago

TWAT - I really wouldn't change a thing. The synth-choir is a bit much, and I do dig the 02 version, but as is I'm happy with it. Brilliant song.

Prostitute - Love it. Doesn't really need to change and the song really isn't structured for a traditional solo. As is I love it.

The Blues - I dig both 02 and 06 versions. I have no problem with the stripped down version. Would be happy with both, but have to admit I'm more attached to the stripped down version now. I just hate the new title.

Catcher - Remains to be seen.

Riad - Like it as is. From the small snippet of the intro in the demo commercial I'd say it has been tinkered with, but I don't have any complaints..... So far. 16

Madagascar - This song needs new 'cleaner' vocals ASAP.

Better- Love the new 06 version. I hope it hasn't been messed with.

IRS - Love the new 06 version. This is the rare case where all the tinkering helped it. It's actually one of my favorites.

If The World - Not my favorite. I'd say, needs new vocals, another big solo. Hopefully it has been improved with tinkering.

Shacklers Revenge - Just don't understand the point of putting this on the album. Or replacing Bucket with Bumble on a Buckethead song.

Chinese Democracy - *takes a breath* WHAT THE FUCK WERE YOU THINKING AXL!!!!! 4

Bumble ruined a great song along with the layered vocals. I just don't understand it. It was like turning Smells Like Teen Spirit into Shackler's Revenge.


And hey DTJ! Nice to see you back.

#11502 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

Agenda? I was just giving you shit, man. I don't know why you make this such a big deal. It really doesn't matter to me if its a hit or not... I would like it to be big for the band's sake, but you're the one who seems to have an agenda.

Why can't you just be happy that they're doing good so far? If it ends up tanking I will have no probem saying its a failure.

#11503 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:

I'm gonna go out on a limb and say the song hasn't been out long enough to make it on any of these rock charts. These various request lines/shows don't count. Lets wait to see the real charts.

You're right. But even if it does end up being number 1 buzz is just going to say it doesn't count because people were requesting it And that's not fair! CHEATERS! 16

It's usually 1 1/2- 2 weeks for some charts.

#11504 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot featured Guest on Eddie Trunk Friday Night » 941 weeks ago

I tried reading some of the thread at HTGTH but the members of that site are making my head hurt. Ugghhh.

*thanks Jesus for this site*

From the few rational fans that remain on that site, they're saying he wouldn't answer anything CD related, not even the release date which is already known, the callers were assholes and all in all the interview was horrible.

#11505 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

Yeah, the serpintine doesn't really go well with guitar 16

#11506 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

I'm actually most encouraged about Madagascar on the album. Looking at how CD changed there's no telling how Maddy's changed. Mostly the changes are vocals and adding 'more' into the music than changing the structure of the song. What killed CD for me might be what elevates Maddy.

#11507 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

Dude, there is no way I'm going to go backtracking this thread that you and a couple of others ruined a long ways back to see what you're talking about. I'm just going on what you posted above.

#11508 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

Then by that standard there is absolutely no way to guage who has ever had a legit number 1 single because we have no clue if its always been "fan clubs" and a few select fans of a group calling non stop to every radio station they can to get them to number one. More than likely, other artists have had ten times the ammount of people doing exactly what some GNR fans are doing.

#11509 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

" So IF you're going to purposely "cheat" the results, you cannot in turn use those results as evidence of success."

There you go again. By your logic, no band who has ever attained a number one single deserves it because of their "idiot fans" are cheating.

Obviously there are people who want this band to succeed and those who want it to fail. That's clear.

#11510 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

What fanbase doesn't flood radiostations with requests? That's how they get high chart positions. It's completely ridiculous that you're attacking people for doing what every other fanbase does. They want their favorite band to be successful.  Jesus Christ, Buzz, come off it aleady.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB