You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#111 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff McKagan on tour with GNR? » 597 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

I think if Duff had some real integrity and back bone he would say, "If Slash can't play I can't either" and leave it at that.  That would take balls.

Maybe Duff doesn't need the money that much, he doesn't need Axl's "friendship" that much and he doesn't want to ease the Madman towards Slash that much... maybe he has plenty of free time and wants to piss Slash, cause the Top-Hatted One has been blocking VR for 7 years now. I'm not saying that this is the scenario, but about as legit as any other explanation.

#112 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff McKagan on tour with GNR? » 597 weeks ago

otto wrote:

If it were 93 and we had message boards, would you all be saying this about Izzy as well?

"Well, yeah, he left because it became a circus and now here he is, playing with them... izzy man, spineless!"

Guns business' side: Instead of hiring a bass player who has to learn 20+ songs, they HIRED (there, I said it) one that knows most of them, has to learn 3 or 4 new ones (yes, he will play CD songs) and also has a history with the group.

Duff side: travel south america with family, enjoy some high profile/full of people gigs, be praised, cash in some good bucks, then, when he had enough of dealing with Axl's bullshit backstage, goes back to his normal life.

Axl side: Duff was the last to give up and judging by Duff's book and Axl's interviews, they were always on good terms but on a grey zone of discomfort in the sense of "who'll call first?". Good things they patched some scars in London.

People comparing this with Slash or "why not with Slash?": comparing apples to oranges. They haven't come to amicable terms yet and maybe never will. You get angry because it becomes more evident that a full fledged reunion will not occur (any time soon). Also, Axl has been really vocal about his problems with Slash and there are rumors that he demands a public apology and until that happens... well...

Slash: If he did have problems with Duff joining for a few songs, he did not make it public. Also, if he did, the RNRHOF occurred AFTER that and they are buddies again., on good terms, so I don't think Duff sees this as a problem and, if my instincts are to be right (given what I read about his life and modus operandis in the GNR days) he probably spoke to Slash prior to accepting the offer.

It's not easy to overlook some important fact: the 1993 band still had _the majority of the classic line-up_ and they were playing the asses off promoting _relatively new albums_, _they wrote_ and Izzy, who rejoined for a while, _was a co-writer of those songs_ and they did a helluva job, performing _amazing shows_.
Now we only have 1 original member, who's a shadow of his former shelf, who's playing a boring setlist just to rip off his remaining fans, with songs written by people he publicly hates, whom he didn't want to joing the stage, honouring their lifetime achievement. Also Duff - unlike Izzy - will be joining replacements of replacements, and not his old buddies (minus Steven). Plus, nobody on Earth questioned GN'R being GN'R back then - now only lunatics and zealots are preaching it's the same band.

So I guess this story is a little bit different, and noone can pretend it's 1993 again.

#113 Re: Guns N' Roses » Duff McKagan on tour with GNR? » 597 weeks ago

Duff is a grown man and he can do whatever he wants. Although I agree that he's legtimizing Axl's madness by these performances.

But what's much worse, and even pathetic is that Axl is now trying to sell his shows with Duff. I know that it's been a nostalgia cash grab for years, but hey - reunite the whole band or fuck off. I'm not so sure that I'd want a reunion though until Axl can get his shit together and perform above the level of an average drunk singin' in a karaoke bar.

#114 Re: Guns N' Roses » Robb Flynn Rants - Mentions GnR! » 599 weeks ago

This happens, when "rebellious attitude" becomes a corporate product, something to sell. Axl is not someopne who wanna change the system. He's the little dictator who wants "his system", his "sociopsychotic state of bliss" to be the norm. For him at least, cause others' insanity drives him even more crazy. Sorry, I'm drunk, but I can't feel anything but sorry for this man, who seemed to be the greatest kick ass frotman, almost a Messiah to me and he's only jerking off for old shit. Victory or death, Axl. You're too late, anyway. Fucked it up and the real rock and roll Messiah hasn't come. Keep playing your old jukebox, keep drinking and keep talking about doing something. It will ease the pain of wasting your mega talent and your band's mega talent as well. The biggest waste ever in rock and roll.

#115 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 599 weeks ago

Axl's GN'R is a fraud. It pretends to be the old band, but it isn't. It pretends to be something new, but it isn't. It's a cash cow for a burnt-out middle-aged man who's too crazy to do anything new, yet not crazy enough not to do this worthless tribute shit.

#116 Re: Guns N' Roses » March 20th, 2014 - Rio De Janeiro, Brazil » 599 weeks ago

This band doesn't worth talking about it.

#117 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New Slash Red House Cover - Live Jam » 599 weeks ago

Slash sounds very good. I'm still hoping for a blues record in his lifetime. Next time when Myles will be busy with AB, he could record one with different singers. I don't even mind if half of it would be covers.

#119 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 600 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
Mikkamakka wrote:

Nothing's more phony than blackmailing the others to get the band name then leave the band and start another with the same name.

BTW Axl has never been "upfront" in his interviews (except his crazy name callings), he's always trying to say a lot without saying anything. Cause reality is his biggest enemy. Truth is the truth hurts.

He gave them a contract, stating the rights to the band would go to him. That can be called a lot of things, but certainly not phony. The contents were there for all to see.

Axl has always been a direct person. If he doesn't like something he won't hesitate to say it. He's not the kind of guy to go around pretending everything is ok then secretly bad mouth people behind their backs. Being extremely subjective and to the point of delusional in his assessment of events is not a great trait, but it's far from being phony. It's generally pretty rare for rock stars to not have a big ego. Admitting his own faults and seeing his own part in what transpired is a problem for Axl, not the truth. He's not a liar. If you treat him right he will not attack you or betray you, he just wants his business to be his business, however impractical that may be in his line of work.

Yeah, he's phony, cause he is always name calling Slash N' the others, yet never gives a straight answer or any details. He's always shady and wants fans to believe in his truth (aka te Only Truth) without any evidence or detail. Axl Rose is the biggest manipulator in the history of rock and roll, and a proven thief.  What he's done to get the name and total control of the other band with the same name is one of the nastiest thing ever done in rock and roll. I agree that he's delusional as a lunatic, but other times it's clear he's lying to hide the truth and to mislead fans. Just because he's crazy enough to attack anyone physically doesn't make him upfront. As soon as he talks, he's a double talkin' jive motherfucker.

Note: I'm not saying that Slash would be upfront or he wouldn't want to look much better/cooler in the media than what he actually is. But portraying Axl as his opposite is ridiculous.

#120 Re: Guns N' Roses » 11-21-2012 The Joint, Las Vegas (Being filmed in 3D) » 600 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
apex-twin wrote:

I argue it takes two to tango. If you read his autobiography, Slash admits he was a chronic alcoholic during his last years in Guns. If you want to read an apocryphal account of how he felt immediately after leaving Guns, try this one. The Devil is in the details, and this one gets them down curiously well.

Slash explained, "Oh, well, it just seemed like it as about him. Shit I wrote a whole fucking album about Axl Rose, and he never even knew it."

Thanks, never read that before.

I guess that's an example of the side of Slash Axl is always talking about, the side you never see in interviews or his autobiography. That's pretty messed up, suggesting to some half strangers your former band mates beats kids. And to think they would ever write a song about Axl Rose like that at all, like wtf do they know about it. Then that whole antagonizing part of "are you a fan of Axl?". Axl may have some women issues, but Slash definitely seems to have some Axl issues himself. That whole story about him going up to Axl's house to declare "he won the war" suddenly starts to look a lot more plausible.

The difference between the two is that Axl was always upfront about how he felt about him in interviews, Slash always plays it a lot more coy. And that's why they don't get along. Slash is kind of a phony.

Nothing's more phony than blackmailing the others to get the band name then leave the band and start another with the same name.

BTW Axl has never been "upfront" in his interviews (except his crazy name callings), he's always trying to say a lot without saying anything. Cause reality is his biggest enemy. Truth is the truth hurts.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB