You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#131 Re: Guns N' Roses » HOOKERS 'N' BLOW, LOVE/HATE Tour Dates Announced » 906 weeks ago

But whats gonna happen between February and late March? wink

#132 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Info regarding CD » 907 weeks ago

Thanks man! smile

Well, I guess everyone knows about the album being done (including mixing and mastering, Id say). Baz, Richard, Dizzy and some other "inside" people already said that last year.

#133 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Info regarding CD » 907 weeks ago

I really don't know. But from what I see, there's some stuff (like the HD stuff with Better) that was somewhat official, but not supposed to be in that way and makes Jarmo, with some inside background, to not allow those kind of things on the board. May be the case here.

Also, as a journalist myself, I know how often people misquote in order to get a point. Maybe the guy just tried to interview Beta and she denied politely, but he used her words (and the very little info about the album being done) as if it was a proper interview.

DoubleTalkingJive wrote:

Welcome Voodoochild.

Neemo wrote:

BTW welcome Voodoo!!! 22

Thanks guys! 22

#134 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Info regarding CD » 907 weeks ago

Wow, I was just talking about a possibility. No need to reply with sarcasm.

In fact, I just said the author hinted to have something more in the article. Of course he may said that to tease people to buy the mag, but he also wouldn't spoil the article for obvious reasons.

I don't know, I did not read the article. I was just trying to explain why would Jarmo delete the thread about the article. I don't know him, I just wanted to see another possibility instead of just insulting the guy without knowing the facts.

#135 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Info regarding CD » 907 weeks ago

I was talking about the real article, not this preview.

I saw what Neemo found out, but still, there's something more in the article as hinted the author.

#136 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Info regarding CD » 907 weeks ago

Or maybe because the mag twisted Beta's word in the article (I mean the real one, not this preview).

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB