And I can understand that logic. There's been people in my own personal life I spent hours, days, weeks, years around every day or every week and knew intimately and worked with and was friends with etc. that you put up with tons of and tons of shit that was seemingly okay 5 years ago, or 10 years ago, or 15 years ago, but now? It would take an act of God to get you in the same room because of all of the doings that went on that caused you to break apart in the first place. Alot of head issues because of the emotions tied in to it, the egos tied in to it, and the general "me first" attitude of every breathing thing on this planet.

The difference?

If I had $150 million for a world tour lying on the table for the taking, i'd be fucking GONE with cash stuffed in my ass. Even if I was already making $12 mil a year with a bunch of touring musicians playing Indian weddings.

**SPOILER ALERT**

Not that the Oscars have any credibility (TDK deserved a nom in 2008), but honestly TDKR didn't deserve a nom this year. I'm not that familiar with the class of films they chose, so maybe it's real weak, I dunno.

But just based on the merits of TDKR itself, I don't think it deserves a nom. It's the weakest of the three Nolan Batman's, which is even more glaring because it was the film to follow TDK (the best), and even if TDKR had been the only film in the franchise, there's missing attributes to the story that are obvious, plus I agree with what most critics are saying as the ending "wasn't very good".

And I agree with that as well. It's actually a good film up to that point, but I don't really still understand what Nolan was going for in the ending. It seemed like he just gave up on the film at the end. The fly The Bat off into the ocean with the bomb was weak sauce and incredibly cliched for a franchise of this caliber and a director who basically re-invented the comic book film, and he choses a throwback Superman concept to lock out the film which... uhh... ok.

I thought the part of keeping Bruce alive kept the fans appeased, but the critics have majorly complained of it as being gutless. Nolan basically teased killing off Batman at the end of the film, which was a huge statement that literally within seconds he reversed because of the assfuck nerdgasm that would ensue by the thought.

I think his statement was with Robin that "Batman will live on with other men, but Bruce Wayne is retired and happy", so Batman is not dead. Batman is immortal. Batman is an idea. Almost like Jesus.

I don't know, I just felt anti-climatic when I saw the film's ending originally in a theater.

They'll absolutely love you in San Francisco

Axl's not accepting orders from anyone. What Axl's doing is getting ahold of the airplane stick and ramming it straight down to say "I can" to prove a point he's in control.

The thing is, absolutely NO ONE outside of music business sharks even care. The only people he hurts is his fans, his "family", the band who helped launch his career, and ultimately... himself.

Axl has completely confused "accepting orders" with "common sense". It's like having a 16-year old whore daughter who goes and fucks her boyfriend because you told her not to, and then ends up pregnant asking for you to take care of her.

She (Axl) proved nothing that she's a fucking idiot. Not that she's in control. If anything she proved the exact opposite.