You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1591 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
most people prefer slash, duff, izzy, and matt or steven. i do too. i guess that means they are lining up behind you. sounds to me like they are lining up behind the musicians.
what's "dead dude"? are you forgetting a comma?
my post that you did not like was a repsonse to dtj and it was on topic. quite frankly, i'd prefer it if i were talking to myself at this point.
i thought i asked you to pm me...
#1592 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
i'm here buzz
i told you to pm me if you have something to say
perfect grammar doesn't trump intelligent and objective thought either
i have better things to do than using spellcheck on a gnr fan forum
#1593 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tom Zutaut kicked out » 911 weeks ago
i doubt axl was involved but it's still sad
someone decided it was a good idea
#1594 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
who's "they"? you can' start a sentence with "they" unlesss it is already presented, which it wasn't.
and, yes, you could do this for hours. that is why nobody likes you.
#1595 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
i'm in a hurry buzz
i don't take as long to post as you do. but once again, YOU'VE CHANGED THE SUBJECT!!!!!
i fixed it for you as well
so you can read it
#1596 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
I guess that explains why they were removed from the recording contract in the same press release that Slash was, right? Or was it some other press release? Very objective. Nice job.
there ya go, buzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
i'm off to work
pm me with any more of your (waste of my time) tidbits, k?
the mods don't like us ruining the threads like this.
#1597 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
yeah and i was responding to a moderator's comment and on topic. i think i am safe. but nice try.
#1598 Re: Guns N' Roses » Tom Zutaut kicked out » 911 weeks ago
it's too bad
#1599 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
I guess that explains why they were removed from the recording contract in the same press release that Slash was, right? Very objective. Nice job.
dude, what does that have to do with slash and duff not being gnr anymore?
anyone that says this is not gnr is being subjective because..
this is gnr, whether you like it or not and you haven't given me one objective reason why i am wrong.
you're too busy changing the subject and, speaking of grammar, who's "they"? that post doesn't specify much of anything.
#1600 Re: Guns N' Roses » For the record..... » 911 weeks ago
war wrote:lol
the original lineup didn't include slash. so to, objectively, say what the real gnr is we must use the law or look at the founding members. since the founding members aren't the lineup that reunion buffs refer to as "the real gnr", using the law becomes the sole to for defining gnr, objectively. for me anyways
Ah, the old "dead guy and wish he was dead guy were really Guns N' Roses" response when the fans of the new band run out of cases to make. Usually they put up a little fight first instead of pulling it out so quickly.
ughh. it's not a bit, it's a fact and more proof that i am being objective and you are not, which was the whole point of my posts.
