I don’t listen to conservative radio, so I’ll take your word for it. But radio has always been the extremes; that’s what sells. 

Feel free to call me a Trumpkin, but I feel someone in the FBI should be looking at what really went down - was there improper conduct to exhonerate Clinton?  I’m not saying there was, and even if there was, depending on the extent I don’t know if people should be charged. But we just had a 2 year investigation into the conspiracy Trump worked with Russia to win the election. People have been called traitors and “treason” has been tossed around all on a lie. A bogus document paid for by Clinton. A document fed to a FISA court to get warrants that didn’t declare the origin of the document or the lack of any evidence to substantiate it. You need reasonable suspicion to get a warrant. Not just random accusations without any basis. I can’t call the police and tell them you’re skinning cats alive in your basement, and they get a warrant based solely on that evidence. And the source of the accusation would absolutely factor in the reasonabless of said suspicion.

We now know Trump didn’t collide with Russia. No American worked with Russia in the election. Not one. That’s what Mueller says.

We know Lynch called Comey and told him to refer to the Clinton investigation as a “matter” instead of “investigation”. We know she met in a private hangar in the days the investigation wrapped. We know Clinton destroyed evidence after a subpoena.

I’ve said from day one, I didn’t give a shit about any of that. I never once said “lock her up”.  But you can’t have a two year investigation into an absolute falsehood created directly by someone Clinton hired, and then had people favorable to her in the FBI use to launch an investigation, and then ignore all the actual, objective and known crimes she committed.

You can’t ignore that the appearance exists that Clinton paid for a bullshit dossier involving Russian intelligence, and then had people favorable to her use it to create the conditions that a special counsel was necessary. Clinton’s email use was so egregious, the FBI was forced to investigate it to maintain any semblance of impartiality. But we know they gave immunity to every person to testify what happened, and didn’t even bother to document Clinton’s own testimony. Then with no report, declare her innocence.

Then compare that with what Trump just had to undergo entirely based on a lie funded by Clinton. You don’t see how that gives the appearance of being heavily one sided?  Like to the point of corruption?  Remove the partisan bias and just look at what’s known and how our federal government handled the investigations based on what we know now and what was known at the inception of each.

I think someone should be looking to see if the appearance of wrong doing is based on fact. And if so, assign a special counsel. Which is the exact thing I said when the bogus accusations of collusion first manifested.

The only people I feel are being disingenuous here are the people who claimed collusion for 2 years, but havdwaive the notion of looking into who was so incompetent in the handling of the process.

I think Mitch has finally broken. Does anyone know a repair shop for angry white males suffering from severe TDS?

Welcome back!

I have a few VPNs I utilize for security and work related stuff. I can make my IP appear to be from almost anywhere.

Has anyone seen a 9/11 Truther lately?  The guy who posted Alex Jones links and swore that Trump was a cockholster for Putin?  The guy who called everyone a traitor and swore every conspiracy was true?

Just wondering if he’s got back on his meds yet or if he’s gone back to threatening lawsuits against this forum and making up lies about threats he’s received.