You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1801 Re: Guns N' Roses » Your GN'R fillers » 530 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

Speaking of what james was saying about "Changing Tastes" - Riad has become one of my favourite CD songs. Doubt my early reviews would have listed it that way....but something about the vocal line grew on me....it's sort of a sing in the shower number now...lol....but I think it's vocal line are impressive.

Another thing I find interesting is that many seem to find Get in the Ring and Shotgun Blues problematic but arn't bothered by Sorry - which to me is just as petulant.

As you get tired of the hits new favorites definitely arise. Nowadays I play Perfect Crime a lot, The Garden I think is a classic. Totally burnt out on November Rain though. Used to listen to that song on repeat while I slept.

Others I would have considered filler in the past but which have later grown:

You Ain't The First - a nice breather on a long album. Really captures the southern, classic rock feel of UYI I.

Back Off Bitch - has a really kickass Slash solo

Bad Apples - one of the true band efforts on UYI. simple fun.

#1802 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Whispers - The Secret History of the New Studio Album » 530 weeks ago

I remember. Forums went wild about that for a while.

What is he saying now?

#1803 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 530 weeks ago

If you think Donald Trump is scary, get a load of Ted Cruz’s foreign policy team

The Texas senator has assembled one of the most terrifying collections of disgraced aficionados in existence

On Wednesday the Donald Trump Fan Club on “Morning Joe” asked the candidate who he is talking to for foreign policy advice. He replied: “I’m speaking with myself, number one, because I have a very good brain and I’ve said a lot of things.”

Remarkably, this was only the second dumbest foreign policy-related news coming out of the Republican primary this week. Because even though Trump’s steroidal jingoism could easily overtake the Bush era for the worst foreign policy of the post-World War II era, Ted Cruz is always there in the background to remind us that it can always be worse.

To wit: Meet the Texas senator’s newly announced team of foreign policy advisors.

Let’s start with Elliott Abrams, a poster boy for failing upward in Republican circles. Aficionados of the Reagan administration’s Iran-Contra scandal remember that Abrams was buried up to his neck in that affair, to the point that Lawrence Walsh, the independent counsel who investigated it, was prepared to charge him with multiple felonies. Abrams slithered out of that with an agreement that had him plead guilty to two misdemeanors, was later pardoned by George H.W. Bush, and then censured by the D.C. Court of Appeals for giving false testimony to Congress on three separate occasions.

Then there is Andrew McCarthy. No, not that one. This is the bad Andrew McCarthy, the National Review writer and conservative activist who wrote one of the greatest “Yeah but” columns ever about Obama and birtherism. McCarthy’s argument was essentially that, while there is no doubt the president was born in Hawaii, the fact that there was any controversy over it at all was proof he couldn’t be trusted to be honest about anything. He has also used his perch at NR to excoriate the president for, among other things, wanting to close Gitmo, calling waterboarding “torture,” and having any association with “radical America-hating leftists” like Bill Ayers.

But the crown jewel of Cruz’s foreign policy team, the shining star of the firmament, has got to be Frank Gaffney. The Newsmax columnist and Pamela Geller running buddy is so far to the right that the Reagan administration shut him out of working on nuclear arms-control negotiations with the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, despite the fact that his job title then was Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for — wait for it — Nuclear Forces and Arms Control Policy. He was eventually fired, but the right wing being what it is, there was apparently still plenty of work for a guy who the Southern Poverty Law Center has called one of our country’s “most notorious Islamophobes.”

http://www.salon.com/2016/03/18/if_you_ … licy_team/

#1804 Re: Guns N' Roses » Your GN'R fillers » 530 weeks ago

AtariLegend wrote:

I don't equate tracks I don't like as filler. I like Think About You, but the argument stands.

I admire polluxlm's optimism that this would be a balanced discussion to bring up on a Guns N' Roses forum tongue.

I have complete faith in the members of Evo. 3

#1805 Re: Guns N' Roses » Your GN'R fillers » 530 weeks ago

Seems to be a hate it or love it track. For me it's just too cheesy and upbeat. GN'R in hair metal mode. It doesn't fit the album, nor do I think the song is all that great.

#1806 Re: Guns N' Roses » Your GN'R fillers » 530 weeks ago

I knew you'd say something like that. 14

Come on, cough up yours.

#1807 Guns N' Roses » Your GN'R fillers » 530 weeks ago

polluxlm
Replies: 42

List what you consider filler in the GN'R catalog. I didn't include TSI since it's a cover album, but feel free to include it if you want. In a week or so I'll compile an Evo top 10.

Mine:

AFD

Think About You
You're Crazy
Anything Goes

Lies

Reckless Life
Nice Boys

UYI I

Bad Obsession

UYI II

Shotgun Blues

CD

Shackler's Revenge
Riad N' the Bedouins

Curiously the early albums contain the most filler for me. Even though I think they display Guns at their best and purest overall. And I definitely dislike those AFD fillers more than I do them on later albums. It's a little weird. Maybe it's a contrast thing? AFD is so menacing and tight, that when it's not you really notice.

#1808 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 530 weeks ago

To be fair it wasn't all the voters, just enough to edge a tight race. About 20%. 14

#1809 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 530 weeks ago

(CNN)Prominent conservatives led by Erick Erickson on Thursday called for a unity ticket and a convention fight to stop Republican front-runner Donald Trump.

"If that unity ticket is unable to get 1,237 delegates prior to the convention, we recognize that it took Abraham Lincoln three ballots at the Republican convention in 1860 to become the party's nominee and if it is good enough for Lincoln, that process should be good enough for all the candidates without threats of riots," Erickson wrote in a statement after conservatives gathered in Washington to discuss ways to thwart Trump's march to the nomination.

The billionaire businessman dominated primary contests on Tuesday, but his loss in Ohio raised the prospect that he won't secure the delegates needed to win the GOP nomination. His campaign has come under heated criticism from many Republicans over the past week after violence erupted at some of his events and some in the party are searching for last-minute ways to avoid him becoming their standard-bearer.

"We are committed to ensuring a real conservative candidate is elected," Erickson said in the statement. "We believe that neither Hillary Clinton nor Donald Trump, a Hillary Clinton donor, is that person."

The statement also called for a unity ticket.

Conservatives at the meeting had "absolute consensus" on trying to stop Trump from getting enough delegates to clinch the party's presidential nomination, according to a source familiar with the discussion.

Conservative leader Bob Fischer gathered more than a dozen activists and Republican lawmakers to discuss how to stop Trump from getting their party's nomination.

The source said the consensus was around preventing Trump from reaching 1,237 delegates, and then stopping him at the convention. The source added that the conservatives are optimistic for this option, adding they believe "it is possible."

The idea of a third party being formed to combat Trump remained a bone of contention for the group, the source said, adding, there was "real division" over the idea. But there was also discussion that if Trump is the GOP nominee, then "the GOP ceases to be a party for traditional conservatives, who must go elsewhere." The thought process at this session was to work with "an existing third party instead of trying for ballot access." That would probably be the existing Libertarian or Constitution parties.

This source said the meeting was made up mostly of "diehards of the conservative movement," including, "Reagan revolutionaries, if you will."

Not all the attendees appeared to be giving up on Trump's existing challengers.

"I'm there to support Ted Cruz," said Mike Farris, a Republican lawyer, as he left the Army and Navy Club, where the group met behind closed doors for close to three hours. "There's a lot of Cruz support."

Rep. Trent Franks, a member of the House Freedom Caucus, attended the meeting briefly. So did conservative leader Bill Wichterman.

The event was advertised as a meeting of the group Conservatives of Faith. Erickson, who has floated the idea of a third-party candidate against Trump dialed in to the meeting by phone.

With wins in at least three nominating contests on Tuesday, Trump is the overwhelming front-runner in Republican delegates, though he still faces the possibility of a contested convention this summer, particularly if either of his remaining rivals, Cruz or Ohio Gov. John Kasich, gathers momentum.

http://edition.cnn.com/2016/03/17/polit … index.html

#1810 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 530 weeks ago

Matt was part of UYI. Brought in a more metal style. He didn't reproduce the sound of Adler, but overall he was an improvement on Adler.

Don't really care if he's a dick in private.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB