You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1861 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 535 weeks ago
Single payer is not the answer. I've yet to hear of a country anywhere near our size with socialized health care that likes it.
Everybody on the right in America says that. Those with socialized healthcare that actually reside in those countries, say much differently.
#1862 Re: The Garden » Man Tries To Trade Kidnapped Baby For 15 Big Macs At Arkansas McDonald » 535 weeks ago
McSatire.
#1863 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 535 weeks ago
Cruz peaked last week. That's it for him.
Rubio (Roboto) fucked up, and it's over.
Big move up for Kasich. I like him the best. I don't agree with 50% of what he says, but I find him to be an honorable man.
Christie would do better if this race didn't include Trump. He's the "strong man" persona, but Trump is even more so. So no room for two of those. Same goes for the evangelical types. There are enough of them to go around, so only one can suck up all the votes (Cruz at the moment.)
Carson is a disaster.
Carly executes well, but is a pathological liar and has no chance. She'll get great speaking fees and book sales from this.
Bush seems to be inching upwards, but it sure doesn't seem like a very good ROI for all those big money donors.
If Trump can lock down the next one, then...
Hillary Clinton, always a bridesmaid and never a bride. If Sanders beats her again, then she's in big trouble IMO.
#1864 Re: Guns N' Roses » Big Surprise - We're almost all on the same side! » 536 weeks ago
Page 6...has a schism developed yet? haha
#1865 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Guns N’ Roses shouldn’t be reforming *BBC Article* » 536 weeks ago
I can't argue with number 6.
#1866 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 536 weeks ago
Cramer, I posted 2 articles and 3 videos. Are they all wrong?
Yes.
Don't forget too, we had a supply and demand issue. Supply exceeded demand. Which is why many builders went under. Also the banks collapsed and we went into a recession. They all were impacted by each other.
I certainly would not argue with that. There was a domino effect for sure. Supply shot through the roof once the financing was yanked out from under everybody. Prior to that, the only way the majority of buyers could afford these price points was through "creative financing" (liar loans etc.)
The 5 year and 10 year arms with no money down caused a lot of problems. Though good for people with a lot of cash bad ideas for people who are cash poor.
No income verification. No job verification. No normal debt to income ratio consideration. None of it mattered, since it was repackaged and sold with thousands of other loans as a mortgage backed security. They were playing hot potato and they knew it.
I knew plenty of people who had cash back then, who utilized these loans and ended up losing it all. They'd flip one house, pocket the money, then run out and get three more. These were middle-upper middle class people.
I'd also argue that MOST Americans, overwhelmingly, are cash poor. If the stipulation (even today) was that a home buyer must have six months of income in the bank, little to no credit card debt, and zero delinquencies, then nearly everybody would be renting. I also find that when people make more money, they're still broke, they just have nicer shit. Such is the American mindset, conservative or liberal, makes no difference.
#1867 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 536 weeks ago
I'm disappointed you couldn't tie that in with Soundgarden...just sayin'.
#1868 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 536 weeks ago
You admit the housing crisis goes back basically to making sure everyone got a house correct? And who propped up those toxic loans and predatory lending to mainly African Americans? THE FUCKING DEMOCRATS. then it all collapsed because everyone got in on it and everyone started taking advantage of it, even the banks because it was easy money. Not everyone needs their own home or free cell phone or free college tuition. It is that mentality that creates this entitlement nanny state that will hurt us for decades to come.
Nobody forced the banks to give out loans. The banks gave out loans because THEY MADE MONEY and they were greedy. Who propped up the loans? Wall Street, that's who.
You think only poor people took out sub prime loans? Reminds me of my dickhead cousin, who lost all nine of his houses during the bust, then blamed the entire thing on the poor blacks. Funny how when it comes to personal responsibility, Republicans sure like to blame it all on the least among us. He was quick to brag about the money he made prior though. So when he was up, he was a genius. When he lost his ass, then it was everybody elses fault.
The free cell phone thing...started way before Obama btw. It was enacted in 1985 while Reagan was president.
#1869 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 536 weeks ago
Clinton could have taken out Osama Bin Laden.... and I think USS Cole and WTC Bombing happened under his watch. Had Clinton has a 3rd and 4th term much if that decade would have gone the same fucking way.
Clinton, like Bush had a domestic as well as a foreign born terror attack on his watch. The perpetrators of both (Twin towers bombing and Oklahoma bombing,) both had their sorry asses put in jail.
#1870 Re: The Garden » 2016 Presidential Election Thread » 536 weeks ago
It is not the low income earners fault at all. It was the policy they came up with to give them loans that was the issue.
It was unsustainable. The influx in loans meant influx in sales, mean increased demand, meant increased costs, meant more foreclosures, then the financial crisis hit and thousands of people foreclosed... They created the "sub prime" market.. That means they gave loans to people with bad credit, etc with variable rates so it was cheap at first but after 5 years the rates went up causing a major cluster fuck. The whole system was fucked up.
The overwhelming majority of these loans weren't backed by any federal entity. They were "mortgage houses" set up with Wall Street money, who gave out loans, then immediately resold them to be re-bundled as securities. The ratings agencies were some of the biggest culprits of this disaster, because they awarded these dogshit securities AAA ratings. Ultimately though, many people were complicit in the bubble: Lenders, Wall Street financiers, ratings agencies, Realtors, appraisers, Mortgage brokers, and the buyers themselves.
I'm also tired of hearing that the Democrats "blocked" anything. 1) Show me one bill proposal put forth by the GOP to tighten up lending practices. 2) Explain to me how a minority party (GOP had the House/Senate/Executive at the time) was able to block this imaginary proposal? Nobody blocked anything, because there was nothing to block. If the GOP wanted to do something back then, they could have easily done it with little if any opposition.
