Right, and anyone with actual ties to the investigation has denied that anyone in Trump's campaign coordinated with Putin.  Did Flynn take money in an unrelated endeavor, possibly.  But no one with an ounce of credibility or knowledge has said there's any evidence ANYONE on Trump's campaign coordinated in any capacity with Russia.

Yea, Watergate took a year.  They also didn't have computers and data forensic evidence.  The FBI is looking into Russia's involvement in our election.  A small part of that investigation included a cursory glance at Trump's campaign and NOTHING has been found or leaked suggesting anyone did anything illegal in this capacity.  The MO of the left is to blur the line of the actual FBI investigating into Russia and make it about Trump.

Trump didn't fire Comey to cover anything.  It's an absurd and ridiculous argument to make.  No one who doesn't have a (D) next to their name and a camera in front of them have even suggested it.  Pelosi herself told her townhall that impeaching Trump isn't going to happen because the man hasn't done anything illegal.

I'm sorry you don't see it, but your devotion to this conspiracy is entirely partisan and stems from your disdain for the man.  You're the birther dude.

I'm not saying take the high road.  Call Trump a fucking moron who can't stand it if anyone who reports to him gets more media attention than him.  Call out how embarrassing it is that our leader spends more time on Twitter than he does meeting with members of congress.  Or anything else you deem concerning.  I'm just saying "you" can't make shit up and claim it's true based on hearsay.

What Trump is doing isn't new.  Clinton did it, Obama did it and every other politician since the radio has done it.  They have an agenda, they cite stories or examples that support it, and hand waive those that don't.  How many people from a Muslim background have immigrated to the US since 1990.  I don't have a clue, but I'm sure it's in the millions. But less than 50 have ever harmed anyone in the name of Allah.  When Democrats talk about guns, what guns do they pull out and use as an example?  Assault weapons.  What percent of gun crime is committed with an assault weapon? Less than 1%.  Sure you can name a dozen shooters over the past 30 years that have used a 30 round magazine to inflict harm, but those account for a statistically insignificant  amount of shooters.  We're talking 1000th of a percent, if that.

And what do you think the media and Democrats are doing?  Name one news organization outside of Fox who might as well be considered a government propaganda tool at times, who has ran a positive story on Trump.  You're telling me that in 4 months, nothing can be written from a positive point of view?  Everyday it's a new crisis.  Yes, the Republicans and Fox were complete dipshits at times under Obama, just as the Democrats were under Bush.  But we've progressively gotten worse and I don't know where the boiling point is.  The amount of hysteria over Trump is unprecedented.  Minus the media, if Clinton had won, Ryan and McConnell would be doing the same thing Pelosi and Schumer are doing now.  Do you think the GOP would have quickly voted on all of her nominees?  I don't.  I don't think it would have been full on obstruction, but a few of her picks would have been shot down.  That's why i voted for her.  I knew that the GOP wasn't losing congress and hoped they'd take their stand on her SCOTUS nominee.  Then she could have governed from the middle and found moderate Republicans and Democrats to largely support her agenda. 

Instead we have Trump who regardless of his position or comments, is portrayed as a fucking idiot on every topic.  Despite Atari's disbelief, I had some very candid conversations at the White House Saturday.  None of them had a clue Comey was let go.  They found out the same way we did, through the news.  There are genuine problems that I think could be resolved if it wasn't a constant cry from Chicken Little everyday.  But the hysteria from the left creates one loud bellow that prevents any real attention being given to any event.  We've moved on from Comey to Trump sharing intel with Russia.  What will happen tomorrow that will change the story once again?

This is how you and others sound constantly claiming Trump worked with Putin.

I'm all about holding Trump accountable for his stupidity.  But he's the one person who gets to bypass classification and sharing policies.  No other person in government can decide when something should be shared or declassified besides him without a vigorous process.  Feel free to criticize his decision making, but this isn't the same as any other person handling classified information.

“The president and the foreign minister reviewed common threats from terrorist organizations to include threats to aviation,” said H.R. McMaster, the national security adviser, who participated in the meeting. “At no time were any intelligence sources or methods discussed, and no military operations were disclosed that were not already known publicly.”