johndivney wrote:

Did you see any Russians?

I'm sure his fantasy had those in it too,

Randall Flagg wrote:

Screaming for Comey to get the boot and then crying foul cause Trump gave it to him is even more retarded.

It's only "retarded" if you take your talking points from the right wing media. Otherwise they are two entirely different things.

Brett wrote:

That Crowder guy is a little pussy. Watch him debate Joe Rogan on marijuana and come apart at the seams like the little bitch, chicken shit, big talk when he's in the driver's seat conservative he is.

He has also proven to be incapable or unwilling to engage in a facts-based discussion on any of his claims when challenged by people who have better credentials than him on a given subject

Flagg, you have to keep in mind that it's okay to think that Comey should've been fired over his handling of the Hillary scandal in the final days of the election process; yet at the same time feel that it's completely unethical for Trump to fire him when he's in the middle of investigating Trump's ties to Russia.

So let's just stick to the facts here:

• Fact #1: Trump thought Comey handled the email thing just fine, actually commended him on his "guts" for speaking up. source: http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/t … mey-230542

• Fact #2: Trump did not fire Comey when he took office, I don't think I need a specific source for this...

• Fact #3: Comey was in the midst of investigating Mike Flynn's ties to Russia during his stint as campaign advisor to the Trump campaign. Source: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/james-comey … e-updates/

• Fact #4: Trump fired Comey, with his administration citing his handling of the emails/clinton case as the reason, completely contradicting Trump's earlier statements. Source: http://edition.cnn.com/2017/05/09/polit … ed-letter/

That's some first level banana republic type shit, right there. Speculating, I think only three conclusions can logically be drawn:

1. Trump has ties with Russia that he does not want exposed, and Comey's investigation was a threat to him. Sure, there's no proof of this, but given the above facts it's also not out of the realm of possibility

2. Trump actually has belatedly come around to the idea that the way Comey handled the Clinton scandal was not appropriate, but is too dim to realize/doesn't care about how the optics of this are incredibly bad for him. I'm happy to believe that he just doesn't comprehend how ugly this looks, I'm not really inclined to think he has actually changed his mind about Comey's actions last October though

3. There's a third unknown reason for firing Comey that the adminstration chose not to communicate, which raises the question as to why they would not just state that instead of coming up with what would then be a lie

Either way, bottom line is that even if you think Comey is the devil for nixing Hillary's chances of winning this election (that was a monumental mistake, if you ask me), it is perfectly fine to question (or even get outraged) about how Trump handled his firing (a clusterfuck of equally monumental proportions, if you ask me). No contradictions there.

There's still zero evidence Trump colluded with Russia. We know Clinton broke the law.

These are exactly the kinds of statements that have me picturing you working as Bill O'Reilly's replacement at Fox news. You are so self-assured, you can turn a blind eye to every smoke signal on Trump, but with no facts, speak as though Hillary's guilt in breaking the law is a proven fact.

AND you continue to bring her up (just like Fox) when she is as irrelevant now as irrelevant can be.