You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#21 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
That's is not a fact. The application of a tense in this case is open to interpretation. This is the perfect metaphor for your modus operandi. You pass on information that could be interpreted multiple ways and once the truth reveals itself you claim one specific point of view on that info is the actual objective point you always intended to make.
Buzzsaw wrote: "has been telling is most definitely past tense."
I wrote: "has been telling is actually the present perfect continuous tense."
You wrote: "The application of a tense in this case is open to interpretation."
http://www.verbix.com/webverbix/English/tell.html
Please show us where it says the tense is open to interpretation.
There is nothing sadder than trying to hide behind grammar wars when your position is faulty, but when you can't even get that right, boy oh boy do you look pathetic . . .
After the Skwerl leaks your behaviour changed drastically. It is almost as if GNR made contact and told you to play ball or get sued. Since then every tidbit you drop makrs gnr seem like gods, axl seem like a saint and you seem like his high priest. You run a nutswingers propaganda site. You delete anything that runs contrary to your nutswinging agenda. Those are facts. We can all observe those points publicly. They're not open to interpretation. That is how facts work.
We've already established that you can't accurately assess whether something is open to interpretation. You claim my behavior changed drastically after the Skwerl leaks, but after the Skwerl leaks, I leaked Shackler's Revenge. So right off the bat, we know your accounting of events can't be trusted. You claim I delete anything contrary to my agenda, but my agenda is correcting false statements and there would be no way for me to do that if I deleted them. Your claim that I delete anything contrary to a "nutswinging" agenda is completely false and the list of falsehoods in your post is beginning to mount. The #1 criticism of my site has been that we are too aggressive in our arguments when responding to criticism, not that the criticism is deleted or censored. One by one, we have frustrated trolls until they give up and quit. To claim that all criticism is censored and deleted is ridiculous and it shows that you actually have no regard for fact when making your claims.
What we dont know for sure is whether it was the tickets they gave you or the threat of legal action that forced you to erect your propaganda site. But we all have opinions on that. And that is how opinions work. I'm sure now that I've offered dome examples from your own life that you are starting understand the distinction between opinion and fact.
GNR has never given me tickets. Another 100% false claim on your part. If it were up to GNR, my site would not exist. They would prefer that I just shut the fuck up and go away forever. So the idea that I was forced to open a site or given tickets or anything of that nature is hilariously inaccurate.
Either way it doesn't matter now because with the new lineup change you are out of the loop. Your tracks don't matter as much as they once did. Beyond a few hardcoees no one really wants a GNR track that hasn't got Slash and Duff on it. On top of that it would seem your links to the band might be gone. Was BBF your link? Again I don't know the exact facts there. But your behaviour indicates that you are out and so trying to kick up controversy again to manipulate your way back in.
I'm more in the loop right now than I've ever been. So that's another falsehood to add to the list. As for whether my tracks matter or not, I stopped trading years ago and couldn't care less what the interest is in the tracks & videos I have. This has nothing to do with my history as a leaker. This has to do with my near decade long history of delivering accurate news and information and a few butthurt haters creating a false narrative that I lie to the fans or that my news and info isn't accurate and truthful.
So now we have to watch you clamour for attention again as you try to worm your way back into some kind of power position. You need to feel important and powerful your ego demands it so you will the start the process again and we will watch your pitiful cries for attention and demands for power and authority in this the smallest most insignificant corner of the internet. That is a mixture of an opinion a fact and a future projection. I predict you are going to start kicking up a shit storm looking for attention from GNR again. My theory is that you do that to feel special. My gut feeling is that you will go too far this time and end up in court.
Those that read my site know I go out of my way to not draw attention to myself. Anything I say could end up being used as a headline on another site, which puts me in a tough position. The idea that I need attention from the GNR world to feel important is ludicrous. 2,000 people read my GNR site each day. 20x that amount of people listen to my wrestling podcasts each week. Any attention I receive in the GNR world, most of which I don't seek, is such small potatoes compared to my real life that your claims here don't make any sense at all. I love GNR and I love all of the GNR fans that I've met, which is why I do what I do. But it is a very very small part of my life and a very very small part of the attention I receive (less than 5%).
As for GNR truth being the smallest most insignificant corner of the internet, I've got nothing but love for Evo and have enjoyed this site for many years, but if Truth is the smallest most insignificant corner of the internet, what does that make Evo when Truth has so much more traffic and activity?
#22 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
Sure, you had a hand in leaking songs back in the day. Most fans lapped it up because of the long wait. The music you shared (or had a hand in sharing) was created by other people. Your contribution was the cloak and dagger routine, is all. Unlike Skewrl, you got away with having a hand in distributing copyrighted material without the rightsholders' consent. Ethics aside, that's what happened.
And none of that has anything to do with my long history of delivering accurate news and information. The fact that I have more unreleased material than anybody and have shared more unreleased material than anybody is irrelevant. Either the news and information I've reported over the years has been accurate or it hasn't. And over and over and over again it's proven to be true. If you don't follow me or my site, you may not be aware of that, but those that do, are. Which is why those that actually pay attention are coming to my defense.
It was a bit rich to think most people cared an iota of your self-confessed IQ - they just wanted the music. You probably understand you came off smug there. Portraying yourself as the Robin Hood of the fanbase felt phony to many (incl. myself) in the midst of all that grandstanding. And that email/Powerpoint brouhaha fizzled from an embarrassment to an obscurity. Fans were none the wiser after all was said and done.
When I got my hands on potential plans, I said I would wait until I knew for sure that things were canceled before spilling the beans on everything. I kept my promise and the information revealed in the lengthy article I published proved to be true. If you don't follow me or my site, you may not be aware of that, but those that do, are. Which is why those that actually pay attention are coming to my defense.
Times have changed, Mister. Even Axl tweets now and tours regular. Now, you show up and say you have unreleased material. What you got, a studio version of Silk Worms? In this day and age, we can hardly feign curiosity towards your act unless you deliver the goods upfront.
People have known for years I have a studio version of Silkworms as well as many other tracks and videos. Many many prominent forum posters have met me in real life and verified all of my claims. If you don't follow me or my site, you may not be aware of that, but those that do, are. Which is why those that actually pay attention are coming to my defense.
#23 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
Sorry chump, you lose. He has been telling is most definitely past tense. Have a good day Mr over sensitive.
You will get no further response from me. I've had my fun with you. Keep chasing your 15 minutes buddy.
Look how quick Buzzsaw wants to vanish when asked a very simple question:
What are the lies I've been telling the fans? He can't answer.
And not only is Buzzsaw trapped in a lie, not only is he desperate to run, but all he could muster on his way out the door was to try to hide behind the empty victory of winning a grammar battle . . . except he can't even do that right either!
Because while he writes "has been telling is most definitely past tense" . . . the fact is that "has been telling" is actually the present perfect continuous tense.
Which I wouldn't expect most people to know, but if you're going to be lame enough to try to hide behind grammar as your moral victory as you slither away in shame, at least make sure you're correct! Nothing more embarrassing than attempting a tactic that lame, only to not even get that right either!!!
#24 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
So you didn't lie about having unreleased materials even though you yourself said you did? So were you lying then or lying now?
No need to answer. Proves my point either way. Go back to your guessing games.
I have more unreleased material than anyone and I have shared more unreleased material than anyone. Did I lie 5-10 years ago about how much or how little I had in order to get more? Yes. Did it work? Yes.
But you wrote:
"that gets overshadowed by the lies he's been telling the fans."
the lies he's been telling the fans
The lies I've been telling the fans . . . present tense . . . then you tell me to read this thread again, insinuating the supposed lies have been discussed in the thread.
But it's funny, I don't see a single previous mention in the thread about lying to hoarders 5-10 years ago.
Clearly you were claiming that I've been telling the fans lies about GNR current events.
Yet when repeatedly asked, you can't give an example. You squirmed for a while before coming up with this lame response.
So I ask again, What are these lies I'm telling the fans and why are you struggling so much to provide examples?
#25 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
So MSL seeing as you're here:
1. Elaborate on why you say the reunion almost didn't happen.
Right before the deal was supposed to be signed, one of the core members made drastic changes to his financial demands (it wasn't Axl). Whole thing almost fell apart. Each of the three has a per show guarantee plus a percentage of the profits. Having to increase one of those per show guarantees after the budget had already been set resulted in some cuts having to be made as well prices for the VIP packages needing to be adjusted.
2. Elaborate on why Izzy was keen to talk to you
I have no idea why Izzy wanted to talk to me. I'm just as confused as everyone else. Maybe he wanted to open up a bit and give his side of the story or maybe he just wanted my thoughts on WrestleMania. 
Either way, GNR wasn't happy about him going public, although I certainly understand why he did.
or
3. Get into a circular smackdown with Buzzsaw until the admins lock the thread.
I wonder which way this will turn out
Buzzsaw claimed that I've been telling lies to the fans. That accusation is 100% false (and he knows it). I can't defend myself though, because he's refusing to tell us what the lies were. Blows my mind that after a decade of consistently delivering accurate news and info that some still try to play this silly game where they pretend I don't know what I'm talking about.
I don't know how many times I have to be proven right at this point. It's asinine.
#26 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
Go insult members on your own forum msl.
Why do you condone him falsely claiming I've been lying to the fans and then refusing to provide even one example?
#27 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
Read the thread son, read the thread. You're likely capable of doing so, but if not I'm sure you can have someone read it to you.
Read the entire thread. Can't find a single lie I've been telling the fans. Let alone multiple as you claimed.
So I ask again, what lies have I been telling the fans?
#28 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 481 weeks ago
mister saint laurent wrote:buzzsaw wrote:that gets overshadowed by the lies he's been telling the fans
What lies have I been telling the fans?
Really? You need to ask the question? On another note, glad you're here so I don't have to worry about you not being able to defend yourself. Keep doing what you do, but understand why there's skepticism towards you.
There you have it folks. Buzzsaw talks shit all day long, but when asked for an example . . . he's got nothing.
A Buzzsaw? This motherfucker ain't even a butter knife. Pathetic.
#29 Re: Guns N' Roses » ID,Izzy looking for your boy MSL via twitta » 482 weeks ago
that gets overshadowed by the lies he's been telling the fans
What lies have I been telling the fans?
