You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#322 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 538 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:

I think, personally, that the side projects and solo careers needed to happen...there was a lot of huge egos and personal problems back in 93 and some of them didn't get resolved even as recently as 2007

Very true, I think they all needed to prove their worth and status independently so they weren't forced to work it out within the confines of GNR. It's just a shame that Axl didn't have the balls to do it as a solo endeavor, like the rest of them.

#323 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 538 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

CD (single) performed better on the Hot 100 than anything from VR

By peak position, yes. But CD only charted for three weeks. Both FTP and Slither had a bit more staying power with 20 weeks each. I think that peak position was mostly due to the name recognition, and the steep drop the result of the lackluster quality of the song. But that's just my humble opinion of course and doesn't add to this discussion. The point is that in overall number of singles sold, FTP and Slither each outsold CD by quite a wide margin.

polluxlm wrote:

so not sure if Duff's post UYI career is that much better than Dizzy's. CD (album) is a decent effort to be part of.

Even if peak position were a good metric, we're talking about his contribution to the single, and good ol' Dizwald doesn't have a writing credit on that.

#324 Re: The Sunset Strip » Friends » 538 weeks ago

julita wrote:

SG: If Axlin16 is entitled to his opinion why you  sound so upset?
From a woman's point of view: I used to find her quite unattractive and that's mostly because of her chin. She is no classical beauty.

That said, she's got stylists and people who helped out a lot in regards with diverting people's attention from her weakest features. This is why she always has gorgeous hair.

Don't underestimate how she came across on the screen as Rachel, I think generally speaking most if not all guys will never even notice a girls 'weakest features' if her character/attitude/personality are great, she takes good care of herself and has a sense of style. Jennifer-as-Rachel had all that and then some.

I recently saw "the one with Ross' girlfriend" on a plane, and it's hard not to fall head over heels with her in that one...

This day-n-age, I'd say Alison Brie and Jennifer Lawrence are sort of modern-day Jennifer Anistons. I can't help but smile whenever I see them in an interview or talkshow.

#325 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 538 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:

Why is there a difference between Duff and Dizzy's contributions? How many hits have Duff written without Axl? How many have Slash?

If we're talking about hits (and not personal opinion about the songs) post UYI's, then Duff objectively has a much better record than Dizzy given his work on Contraband and to a lesser extent Libertad and IFOCS (Beggars, co-written by Duff, charted pretty damn well).

I also think you're underestimating how much of a public spokesperson Duff was for the band back in the day. Whenever Slash wasn't available, Duff would be the guy everyone went to. You don't become a beer on the Simpsons without a public image.

polluxlm wrote:

If we look at song writing the common denominator appears to be Axl, with Slash playing. Everybody else is a mere contributor. If Slash had been on CD it would surely have generated some big hits, and then you are suddenly looking at the same role for Dizzy and Tobias as you do Duff in the old band.

Again, here I disagree with you, but this is more about personal taste than anything. Everyone will likely agree that neither Slash, Duff nor Axl have produced anything that comes close to what they had written together in the past (same goes for Izzy). The more of those core 4 people were included in a solo project, the higher the songwriting quality. So Axl somehow being the linchpin to GnR's songwriting prowess is bullcrap, IMHO. I've said it before, and I'll say it again: to me the best post-GNR songs are on Contraband and IFOCS. Slash's later solo albums all fall short of those two, as does Chinese.

#326 Re: Guns N' Roses » Nightrain Official Site » 538 weeks ago

Axlin16 wrote:

Why does Duff get all this credit? What makes him so special from a business standpoint, and a money standpoint? Let's be honest... this is ALL ABOUT -- SLASH being back.

I'd say songwriting skills as much as it is about songwriting credits. Duff has written or helped write numerous songs on AFD and the UYI's (RQ, It's so Easy, So Fine, PC, Civil War, GiTR, ...) and a good deal of those are either hits, or stand-out deep cuts (if only musically in some cases). Dizzy has three co-writing credits on CD (IRS, TWAT and SoD), but I think it's fair to say that TWAT and SOD are about as Axl as you can get so I'm inclined to say he probably just wrote his parts and that mr. Rose was being kind by including him in the credits.

To me it's another indication that the whole CD era might end up being downplayed a bit in this reunion, but that's obviously just speculation on my part.

#327 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 538 weeks ago

Wow, the not mentioning of other band members is becoming quite ostentatious... I guess they really haven't settled on a final line-up yet?

#328 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 538 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

Obama is prez, so too late now. But I too don't think he was born in the US.

I'm not so sure about that, if republican would be able to prove this, it probably would be good grounds to repeal a number of his accomplishments. If they truly believe he doesn't meet the requirements to serve as president, they should pursue it, they can probably get the supreme court to nullify obamacare, which as we all know is a wet dream of theirs.

Smoking Guns wrote:

Cruz is a clown.

Hey SG, we agree on a political issue, who'd have thought it was possible smile

Smoking Guns wrote:

Sanders at least believes in something, which is saying something, but it is pretty much the total opposite of what I believe.

Disagreement is good, that's how we learn and eventually come up with better solutions. I like your stance on this, respectfully disagreeing with someone after a healthy debate is what honest and intellectually curious people do. I'm curious though, why is it the total opposite of what you believe? I'm gonna go out on a limb and say that there's a big chance that if you look beyond the 'socialist' stigma he proudly carries, you'd find a lot to agree with (like, apparently, the majority of Americans according to polls on the issues).

Smoking Guns wrote:

I feel like Trump is going to win this shit. Crazy as fuck.

I don't want him to deport all the illegals.
I do want him to build a wall.
I am okay with banning people that have recently traveled to or from Most of the bad Middleast countries where ISIS is carrying out acts of violence until shit calms down.

The wall is just crazy nonsense, totally infeasible. But the deportation of illegals I actually support. Illegal immigrants are in the US uhm... illegally, so deporting them is just following the law. Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants though, so as long as they're going through the vetting process, I don't feel they should be deported. That kinda forces the government to analyze the individual cases more quickly, so then can send the rejected ones back ASAP, without sending people back that truly deserve refugee status.
On the travelers, we've had this discussion already, but it's completely impractical to implement this given that most Syrian terrorists never entered or left the Syria or Iraq legally anyway there's no way to know if they've been there. Most ISIS terrorists come from wealthy European countries, and I can't fathom the US banning everyone who's recently been in Europe from entering the country.

#329 Re: The Garden » Donald Trump running for President » 538 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
TheMole wrote:

Any and all of the physical evidence for this has been debunked, all that's left are so called expert reports. I think you had it right the first time around: this is a neo-con conspiracy theory.

Did you actually see it? It was an obvious photoshop job.

The only problem for Obama is that numerous electronic document experts have shown, using steps that anyone can repeat with if they have the proper software, that the document the White House so proudly uploaded is not simply a scanned version of an original paper document. Instead, it’s what’s called a “layered” document. A document that’s scanned will have only one layer, which is the image itself. A “layered,” electronically manipulated document will show one electronic addition after another. The White House’s birth certificate PDF has nine layers. This was an assembled electronic document, not a scanned paper document.

Now why someone would do that is another question, but it certainly suggests some form of forgery.

Yeah, when I first heard that, I was taken aback as well. But then National Review analyzed the claim, and it turns out that if you scan an image in Adobe illustrator and don't uncheck OCR and Optimize, it creates a layered document by default. I don't have illustrator so I can't confirm this, but it seems a better explanation than that it's fake (occam's razor and all). Furthermore, there's absolutely no point for him to lie about his birth certificate, since his mother was born in the US, which makes him a natural born citizen even if he wasn't born on US soil. Plus, if you just imagine how many people would need to be in on this conspiracy, it doesn't register as even remotely feasible to me.
The whole birther thing is just... ugh...

#330 Re: Guns N' Roses » Reunited GUNS N' ROSES To Play New T-Mobile Arena In Las Vegas » 538 weeks ago

Axlin16 wrote:

SG is not Pearl Jam, and most people honestly don't know one single SG song past Black Hole goddamn Sun, and that's it.

Spoonman as well, probably. But yeah, that entire post was dead-on. I wouldn't mind AIC opening for Guns, but maybe they would be better off with a more modern band. A7X (although I'm not that into them) would be a great fit, can draw enormous crowds, and it's no secret that M. Shadows loves everything GNR and is very influenced by Axl.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB