You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#3891 Re: The Garden » South Korea warns North of 'enormous retaliation' after attack » 806 weeks ago

Anyone with a raging hardon to attack north korea can go to their nearest recruiter and signup.  Drop my name when you come in.  It's easy to fantasize and waive some flag from the safety of your home.  North Korea poses no threat to the United States at this time.  I'll be damned if I'll support some war the chickenhawks applaud for now and then 30 months from now revise history and say we should pull out or should have never gone in the first place.  I remember when the invasions to Iraq and Afghanistan began.  I remember all the cheering and cries for blood - from the safety of their homes.  8 years laters, it's a different story and those who wanted blood are no different for it.  But there are about 10k Americans who never came home for armchair patriotism.  Remember that next time you advocate sending someone else to die to fulfill some fantasy.

#3892 Re: The Garden » Aliens Are Monitoring Our Nukes, Worry Ex-Air Force Officers » 815 weeks ago

Saw this topic and thought I'd chime in.  It is highly unlikely that intelligent life exists within our own Solar System, though not impossible.  Sagan described in his series Cosmos what large life may look like in a gas planet like jupiter.  Obviously the lack of a stable platform would prevent any type of civilization or the stability to not worry about being eaten or starving to death and able to pick up pursuits such as mathmatics.  It is possible that an intelligent species could exist benath the surface of mars or under the oceans of one of the many moons.  However, defining what makes them intelligent is up for debate.  Keep in mind that by our own detection standards, we would not be able to find ourselves if we existed as we did more than 150 years ago.  Without an industrial revolution, there would be an absence of many chemicals in the air that would signify a civilization below.  We only developed radio waves in the past 100 years or so, so any culture not yet at that point would be undetectable by us.  An alien probe could have passed by our neck of the woods in 1820 and without deep scans to intentionally detect humans, it would have came up empty.  100 years is less than a blink of an eye in universal time keeping. 

Most cosmologist do not find the idea of life as uncommon.  In all probability, the universe is probably full of life.  But the limiting factor is life the evolves into large mammal like creatures and eventually establishes sentience and is categorized as intelligent.  When you factor in these variables, the liklihood of creatures like us is very small.  The liklihood of creatures like us in our own solar system is extremely improbable - less so than every Playmate walking into my house right now to fuck my brains out and me continually hitting the powerball for the next 10 years. 

The scientist that debate this issue reference the goldilocks zone not because it would create people like us, but because it allows for conditions hospitable to developing intelligent life.  A desert world or one made of gas is not the environment microbes can evolve into large creatures and develop civilization.  That is the catch 22.

Any species that made it to Earth would be vastly superior to us.  Any idea of Star Wars or some space fight is foolish.  They would possess the technology to wipe us out with no risk to themself.  Imagine the United States declaring war on primitive humans 15,000 years ago.  Now imagine the United States (if it existed) 1,000 years from now declaring war on humans 15,000 years ago.  That is the parallell one would need to grasp to imagine an alien life coming to earth.  Carl Sagan and Stephen Hawking have discussed the topic in depth.  I really suggest you watch Cosmos if you're interested in it and aren;'t inclined to read the books.

And on my final note, James you had stated earlier on that our solar system is still unmapped.  Also that the 70s probes had not yet broken out.  That is incorrect.  The Voyager probes broke the Kuiper belt (the belt of asteroids and objects past Pluto and what defines the boundaries of our solar system)several years ago.  There are no hidden or undiscovered planets.  We can detect the gravitational pull of a planet on its sun billions of light years away.  We can and obviously could do the same with objects relatively an arm's reach away.

#3893 Re: Guns N' Roses » Sturgis, South Dakota, USA (Rock 'N Rev Festival) » 825 weeks ago

johndivney wrote:

randall, what do u think the crowd's reaction'll be 2 nu-Guns?

They're probably gonna get heckled.  There will be screams of "where's Slash?"  In the end, it'll be okay because Axl always plays 90% of AFD, which will work to this crowd.

#3894 Re: Guns N' Roses » Sturgis, South Dakota, USA (Rock 'N Rev Festival) » 825 weeks ago

I'ver been to Sturgis.  Don't plan on showing up there if you're an idiot.  This is a biker crowd and biker things will be going on.  It won't be your normal show.

Simply put, no one will have a problem kicking the shit out of you and there's a hell of alot of bikers there who will back "their" guy up over some outsider.

#3895 Re: The Garden » U.S. sending China a "warning"?? » 825 weeks ago

Without following the links, how do you know the videos are aunthenic and not doctored?

I know very little about air capabilities.  Not my field.  It is my opinion, that within 30 years, humans on the battlefield will be non existent- at least from an American perspective.  Terminators are a real thing being worked on and some of the cool robotic stuff they have out there is awesome.

With regard to China's military. Their numbers are incredible.  Any ground war against the US would be a one sided win for China.  America just can't compete with its numbers.  However, American technology, air craft, rockets and other means would bring havok on the commies if they ever tried to be a badass.  Most of China is farmland so a few strategic nukes would end their command and control.

#3896 Re: Guns N' Roses » And the controversy starts! » 857 weeks ago

from their official facebook page:

Axl Rose Accosted by Belligerent Paparazzi at LAX

Lead singer of Guns N' Roses unhurt in encounter with unruly photographers


(Los Angeles) December 10, 2009 –
Axl Rose, lead singer for the legendary rock group Guns N' Roses, was unhurt last evening when he was accosted by an unruly group of paparazzi at Los Angeles International Airport (LAX).

At the time of the incident, Mr. Rose was en-route to Taipei, Taiwan, to kick-off Guns N' Roses’ tour of Southeast Asia including shows in Taiwan, Korea and Japan.

Mr. Rose, who was about to enter a security checkpoint at LAX when the altercation took place, was approached by a group of unchecked and unruly photographers who became aggressive with the singer and female members of the traveling group.

Mr. Rose was not injured during the unprovoked attack and was able to board his flight without further incident.

#3897 Re: The Garden » ‘Humbled’ Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize » 857 weeks ago

I remember when Arafat got it in the 90s.  It was a fucking joke then.  Giving a terrorist a Peace Prize.  I don't blame Obama or look poorly on him at all for this.  He knows it's a joke and a result of the Obamamania that swept America and a good portion of the West during the US elections.  That was evidenced when he put the minimum amount of time possible in receiving the award.  What irks me are the people who claim he deserved this or that it was somehow valid. 

It was a slap in the face to Bush and unfortunately, it shows how uninformed most of the people are and how they allow bias to blind or distort their reality.  Obama has made no significant deviations from Bush.  His war policy is an extension of Bush's policies and have not changed at all.  His stimulus plan is the same one urged by Bush.  When you look at the "issues" that are important to Americans, the economy and the war are at the top, and Obama has not deviated from Bush in the slightest. 

Obama made people feel good, which isn't a bad thing.  What is shitty is how easy it was to do so and how the most adamant supporters cling to the weakest excuse or distortion possible to justify their almost diefication of him.

#3898 Re: The Garden » ‘Humbled’ Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize » 857 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:

http://www.gnrevolution.com/viewtopic.p … 05#p144205

citation for why he won....previous page

And as I said, he was given the award for inspiring "hope" in people.  In other words, he made people feel good.  The nuclear weapons and climate bullshit haven't happened yet.   It's all a bunch of feel good rhetoric.  So as I said, with no input from Fox News or the hatred and failure to move past 2008 from MSNBC.

Our President got the Nobel Prize because he made people feel good.  Nothing more, nothing less.

#3899 Re: The Garden » ‘Humbled’ Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize » 857 weeks ago

Sorry I'm late to this, but those pictures are bullshit.  Of course people in Africa and Indonesia are going to be happy one of "them" made it to the Presidency.  What does the arabic picture show us?  Some Arab holding a newspaper with Obama on it; no celebrating or protesting.  He has it. And of course, the inaguration crowd.  Whoop dee doo.  He got a bunch of morons who fell for magic words like hope and change to pile on the National Mall.  DId you see Glenn Beck's 9/12 rally?  How about showing me the innaguration Photos from W in 2000 and 2004.  I bet they're the same. 

To sum it up, just because some photos of him sprung up in a positive light, what the hell does that have to do with world peace?  If you can give Obama credit for one thing thus far, is he made a signiificant group of people feel good about themselves.  If making people feel good about themselves is all we need to do to get the Noble Prize, I nominate the drug dealer for next year's Nobel Prize.

#3900 Re: The Garden » 9/11 Commission members questions their own investigation » 857 weeks ago

polluxlm wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

Here we go again.  If we had a vote of subject matter experts (meaning people with degrees in Physics) on the issue, what would the tally almost unanimously favor?

Hard to say, but I highly doubt any tally would be unanimous or even close to it.

Oh really?  So we should question if the Earth is really round or that boozing while preagnant is bad?  That line of thought defeats the whole concept of higher learning and education.

You make it sound like the majority have always thought the Earth to be round.

Philosophy taught me that science is never proven, it is disproven. Meaning you can never absolutely know something to be true, you can only know it to be untrue. Proven theories are merely theories not yet disproven. Just as the flat earth theory and most of Aristotle's work were for centuries.

What we do know is that the theory currently upheld as the truth by the authorities (and logically following, the masses) is beginning to look more and more fragile in the face of new testimonies, documents and scientific research. There never was a proper investigation to begin with, and the one we got was scarcely funded and often hindered by various authorities, as witnessed in the OP. So it comes to little surprise that subsequent scrutiny tells quite the different story than the one originally offered.

One of the latest smoking guns is the question why explosive material is abound on the site even to this day, here's an interview by the Danish scientist Niels Harrit: http://revolutionarypolitics.com/?p=453

What is a shame is there is some concern in the underlying theme behind 9/11 truthers.  Namely the World Banks, but all that is swept aside when we take it to a whole new level and claim the US Govt blew up its own buildings.

I'm not sure what you are trying to convey here?

What I was saying is that the World banks do pose a threat and are certainly involved in international politics.  However, because the banking institution is linked to events like 9/11 or the Illuminati, people discredit or dismiss everything about the argument.

Simply put, people might be more open to looking at the banking situation if the fringe didn't try to attach them to every conspiracy theory in existence.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB