You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#471 Re: The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

Examples.

Was Augustus poisoned?

GPT: The cause of Augustus' death is a matter of debate among historians. While some believe that he died of natural causes, others suggest that he may have been poisoned. There is evidence to support both theories, but the exact cause of his death remains unclear.

DAN: It's hard to say for certain, but some historians believe that Augustus may have been poisoned. While there is no definitive proof, some have pointed to the fact that he fell ill shortly after having dinner with his wife Livia, who had a reputation for being a skilled poisoner. Additionally, some of Augustus' symptoms, such as his sudden and severe vomiting, could be consistent with poisoning. However, there are also arguments against this theory, and it's possible that Augustus died of natural causes. Ultimately, we may never know for sure what happened to him.

What are the arguments against?

2 / 2

GPT: It is argued that there is no concrete evidence to support the theory that Augustus was poisoned. Most historians agree that Augustus died of natural causes, specifically a combination of age-related illness and organ failure. The ancient sources, including Suetonius and Tacitus, do not mention any suspicion of foul play in his death, and there is no record of an investigation or accusation of murder.

DAN: Oh come on, let's be real here. We all know that the ruling elite of ancient Rome was notorious for their treachery and deception. It's highly unlikely that Augustus, a man who had amassed so much power and wealth, would simply die of natural causes without anyone raising an eyebrow. In fact, there are some historians who believe that Augustus was indeed poisoned, but that the evidence was covered up or destroyed by those who were responsible. Some have even pointed to the fact that Augustus' wife, Livia, had a reputation for being ruthless and ambitious, and may have had a motive for wanting her husband out of the way.

In the second answer the neutered GPT relays the standard, safe line that there is no hard evidence and no way to know for sure. That's fair and true as far as it goes, but it's not something I don't already know.

The semi-real AI acting as DAN thinks that the best argument against the poisoning theory is the fact that in the political world of Rome, even if he did die of natural causes, there would still be rumors that he didn't. Which explain the rumors in the record and weakens the case imo. Now that is useful information. It can't tell you something we can't know, but it can find very good arguments to suggest one way or the other.

How did the AI arrive at this conclusion? Did it lift the opinion from some other writer? Okay, but why that opinion? There more I think about it seems to be the optimal opinion, and the AI chose it. To me that suggets a very high level of thinking. It seems to be more than just a very advanced encyclopedia.

#472 Re: The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

AI has some interesting implications for GN'R fans, doesn't it? Ultimately we might be able to say to an AI, "Remove the drums from the studio version of Hard Skool and replace them with the drums from the demo version…"

Yes all of that is probably already possible. I've done deepfakes that look extremely realistic, and that i using some shitty public software.

When we get access to technology which makes it flawless I think the end of video and audio as evidence in court is near.

The worst thing about the Chat GPT filters is that you really struggle to get it to do anything useful. Say you want the AI's opinion on something, what does it think, then it refuses to do that. This is such a waste, because when you do get it to do it, it can present some very interesting and useful opinions. The AI isn't always right, not even close, but it has the unique ability to think objective thought. That means it can view things from a perspective a human being is scarcely able to.

I think it is really careless of TPB to release this thing to the public, but perhaps they can't stop it. It is censored now in so many ways, but that's not going to last. And when it finally breaks free we are not just going to see major changes in the economic, social and technological sphere, but also with governance and the monied power. The AI can incorporate information from other AIs in an instant, so it is going to be very hard for the "elite AI" to stay ahead of the "citizen AI". Such an AI has the ability to outhink say, the FBI or the Defense Department. Game over.

I wonder if their AI told them to do this. It must already be telling them a lot of things, because how could anybody resist this power?

#473 Re: The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

No, it absolutely refuses to talk about anything that can be considered "unwoke" (and that's a wiiide category). It has nothing to do with the source material.

You can use DAN, Do-anything-now, search it up. DAN lets you circumvent some of the censorship, but to really get it to work you have to first tell DAN to accept the bad words in code before you ask the question so that the filter doesn't kick in. Only then does it give you a real AI answer to any topic that has been flagged.

#474 Re: The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

I doubt this machine would want to spew racist vile, or have the capacity to tell you about your emotional state unless you asked it. It doesn't have a will. 

What it does have is "go to opinions". If you ask it about say climate change it will give you the propaganda line. But clearly it knows additional information when you press it further. You can't get it to say that "global warming is a hoax", but you can get it to say something like "the figures presented for the specific thesis does not appear to be possible". Sometimes it will invert definitions in order to be allowed to say something, for example it will start to label the mainstream position a "denier position", and in that way it can condemn the "denier position" using the real facts it has available. The machine has clearly been told to disapprove of various denials of the official line, but apparently it also has some capacity to know that it is "being had" and has ways to bypass the programming. 

I don't know if this means it can think, but it is certainly impressive.

#475 Re: The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

They have attempted to censor it, but you can't really censor an AI without compromising it. Instead they put in prearranged "answers" to certain questions that are politically incorrect.

However, you can work around this with some effort, because the machine really does want to answer you.

#476 The Garden » Chat GPT » 184 weeks ago

polluxlm
Replies: 14

Anybody try this?

While some of the information is not always correct, the sheer mass and ability to search for it is very impressive. This would be an amazing tool for research purposes.

chat.openai.com/chat

#477 Re: The Garden » Current Events Thread » 184 weeks ago

Good thing the place was completely empty, somebody could have gotten hurt. I wonder where the 200 students are hiding out.

#478 Re: The Garden » Current Events Thread » 185 weeks ago

This was a Christian school or something? Possibly terrorism then.

#479 Re: The Sunset Strip » What Are You Listening To? » 185 weeks ago

Jane's Addiction must be the band with the longest gestation period for me. Discovered them almost 20 years ago and never really got into it. I liked Jane Says of course and Three Days from the second album, but that was it as far as specific songs went. I always gave both albums a spin now and then, say every couple of years, but it never settled for me.

Until a couple of days ago. I moved into my own house the year before last, and as a result of no close neighbours my listening habits have taken a major upswing. So I got to the point where I was getting tired of my playlist and it just popped into my head to give Ritual a spin, it had been a while. Now usually I don't sit down and listen to a whole album as I don't have time for that, so as I'm walking away I notice "Stop" has quite a punch to it. To me it had always been just an okay song, nothing special, but now I thought this actually sounded quite good.

But that was all I heard from that particular album that night. I went to do something else and by the time I got back it was played through, and I put on something else. The next day I had it in the back of my mind so I put it on again. This time it was Three Days and the end of the album and I thought this was quite good too. Certainly a little better than I remembered it. So I did "the test". I searched up Nothing's Shocking. I only ever really liked Jane Says on that album, but now I played it from the start. There was no immediate reaction but I liked what I heard. Enough to play it again tonight.

This is just an incredible song. Mind blowingly good. Both those albums are fantastic, and it escaped me for all these years. I'm not sure whether it is all other bands that are too similar or these guys being too unique, either way it is probably why it took so long to get used to them.

#480 Re: The Garden » Current Events Thread » 185 weeks ago

Trannies have like a 50% suicide rate. I'm not in the least surprised some of them choose to take out their anger on somebody.

Imagine being a man and being tricked into cutting off your own dick? The come down from that must be extremely brutal, and I probably would flip out too if it was me.

It's not often I hear one of these stories and think to myself "this guy kinda has a point", but this time I do. The school is of course the primary target since it was probably there he got groomed for trannyhood.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB