Yeah.  I'm going to need more than that to believe anything.  Something along the lines of tour dates being announced, tickets being sold, official advertising, etc.  None of these things mean a tour will happen either, but they are more believeable than some guy on youtube.

You may be right, but perhaps it's just what VR needs.  I'm not sure one way or the other, but it could have potential.

Realistically it will never happen.  He will win the competition and go do his own thing rather than hook up with some 40 year olds.  I'm just throwing out an idea.  I think he'd be great and he could sing just about anything.

I'm not.

It's an opinion that 99.9% of the people agree with. 

I don't imply, I say.  I didn't say Axl didn't do them, I said if you want to be technical, we don't know it was really him.  How exactly do you know that Axl did the chats?  Because someone told you it was Axl?  I could type up an Axl rant at any time that would appear genuine...all I'd have to do is bash Slash mercilessly.  But that wasn't my point. 

My point is that if you're going to grasp at straws by debating that an opinion accepted by 99.9% of the people isn't as good as a fact, then I can turn around and do the same thing.  Somehow you recognize the rediculousness of my points, yet fail to see your own.

By the way, my questioning of the "facts" from that website had NOTHING to do with the fact that it was posted online.  Go back and re-read what I said.  As was proven in some thread (maybe this one) recently by neemo and someone else, the information out there is contradictory at best and more likely inaccurate.  If that's me "grasping at straws" then I will proudly continue to do so as it is the only logical thing to do.  I mean, when the data contradicts other data, how do you choose which to accept?  It looks like you accept the one that supports your side while I keep seeking the real answer.  Do whatever works for you.