You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#512 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose/Dexter forum chat discussion thread » 761 weeks ago

war

agreed but cd's best songs aren't rockers and u just named slash's best songs.
although i would call better a rocker thats as good as any of those songs imo.

#513 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago

war

show up and get tickets for half price

who cares who is in the band - go see axl. he has his hands in every song they play.

#514 Re: Guns N' Roses » Santiago, Chile - October 5, 2011 » 762 weeks ago

war
mickronson wrote:

not totally horrible, it sounds like Estranged but has no soul.

i think the crowd singing along is issue there.

#515 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war
buzzsaw wrote:
war wrote:

i choose to base each instance on it's own merits - the same reason i don't block your posts

j/k

everyone lies and everyone tells the truth at times

the fact that axl didn't even care to talk about it or report it until after slash hung himself by running his own mouth and changing his story while was unwaivering says a lot

I never said Slash was telling the truth either.  They both put whatever spin they thought would help them most on it and the truth (as always) is somewhere in the middle.

u did not - i know

but.....

and, yes, the truth is somewhere in the middle....if 90/10 is considered the middle.

axl's side naturally hyperfocused on the extremeties of the happenings.

for example:

let's say slash showed up at axl's house, talks to axl about the weather, sports, etc (trying to be nice) and a half hour later drops a hint that he would consider maybe talking about reuniting some day soon and says weiland is not working out as well as we thought......

axl's story then becomes slash came to his house to reunite the band and weiland is a fraud.

not 100 percent detailed and missing context. but still the same idea.

slash didn't even admit he was at the house at first.

90/10 minimum

#516 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war

i choose to base each instance on it's own merits - the same reason i don't block your posts

j/k

everyone lies and everyone tells the truth at times

the fact that axl didn't even care to talk about it or report it until after slash hung himself by running his own mouth and changing his story while was unwaivering says a lot

#517 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war

slash confirmed that he lied by changing his story. u say axl's camp lied based on what?

#518 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war

tough to call...................slash is bigger, physically, but axl seems to be more of a fitness guy and, as you mentioned, is psycho. axl is more erratic and violent where slash is laid back. axl has a history of violent outbursts so is probably more comfortable fighting where slash does not. i give axl the nod but would not bet the house on him.

#519 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war

well, since you mentioned punches and this is an already dead horse that is the infamous house visit..............who wins in a fist fight, slash or axl?

#520 Re: Guns N' Roses » What "IF" Axl had released a solo album back in 1995 » 762 weeks ago

war

well, that's a good question and supports the theory that slash was drunk. calling him would've been the easiest route if he was willing to go to his house sober.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB