You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#5621 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
What was a bit troubling in that interview is her foaming at the mouth desire over NATO expansion, but the liberals don't care about this because Obama advocates the same thing.
I just get the feeling Barack Obama really gets what's going on with the issue. Moreso than I. And so does Biden & McCain & alot of politicians who are in the national spotlight. Sarah Palin, I'm just not buying it, at all. I get the feeling she memorized what to say off a batch of 3x5 cards over the last few nights.
Overall what have i learned about her so far? She's a nobody who portrays herself as somebody but by doing so comes off as someone who's in way over her head.
#5622 Re: The Sunset Strip » METALLICA Discussion » 922 weeks ago
Awesome, good for them. I gotta pick this up.
#5623 Re: The Garden » GNR Evolution NFL Yahoo Pick Em League » 922 weeks ago
Yeah, again it seemed like I had quite a few of the "underdogs".. We'll see.
#5624 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
Tonight she says "I wasn't a big fan of Bill Clinton's tax policies" ??
Not a very good thing to say right now. After George W, Clinton comes off like an economic genius.
Anyway, you can knock "liberals" for mocking her lack of knowledge on the Bush Doctrine, but then she still has to deal with that answer of "being around oil" as her sufficient experience in foreign relations (I pasted the youtube clip on page 1), or her explaination of the Iraq War being "God's Will" (she also said in the same sermon putting a pipeline into Alaska is also "God's Will"). I don't have a huge problem with someone saying something is "God's Will", but I believe my God is doing Greater work than trying to put a pipeline into Alaska.
#5625 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
^^ I only started in the last few days because it seems every single blog article you found thru google seemed to deserve a whole thread of it's own. As I said, it got tired. You can call it over all you want.
As for feeling "inadequate" about Obama's campaign, I've stated numerous times I have no fear with Biden. Sure Palin gave McCain a slight bump at first, but there's no substance, & the tub is starting to leak. Luckily, for Biden he flies under the radar. Then in a week or month if McCain start to fall, it'll seem lame for him to start slamming Biden & trying to put him down. As I said, after Palin, McCain has nothing to run on, and he might be shooting him in the foot moreso than Obama, because if Obama takes the lead again, McCain himself is left with nothing, and I don't really see McCain holding the lead the entire 8 weeks or whatever is left. Not with such a slim margin.
#5626 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
Off topic, where's all that change stuff that was ushering in a golden age??
Where is it?? It went flushed down the toilet when half this country decided to vote for the same people who ran this country for the last 8 years. More debt, more wars, more puppets.
On a serious note you post pretty pro-Republican here... and after seeing 8 new threads per day about pro-McCain/Anti-Obama it gets tired of seeing. McCain's only leading by about 3%, and who's to believe polls anyway, but even if the election were held today there's a decent chance Obama could & still would win, depending on the outcome of about 2 or 3 states. Plus the youth vote in polls in a huge obstacle because they all own cellphones as we saw when Obama came out of nowhere to win Iowa. Pollsters had to try to rearrange their demographics & math, they may have figured it out in Obama v Clinton, but who's to say it's the same with Obama v McCain. So this race is far from over. After seeing that interview, Palin needs alot of work before she enters the VP debate. To be honest, McCain definitely got a bump in polls after the RNC, but it peaked at about an average of 3%. As people tire, things change, and all it really comes down to are people are less interested in talking on the phone. It wouldn't really surprise me if for every 1,000 people polled, they actually call about 5,000 who just hang up. It wouldn't surprise me if it's 50/50 next week, or even if Obama's winning. And even then it's only mid-September. And what if Obama takes a lead, how is McCain going to catch up next time?? Run even dirtier ads, pick another woman for VP? He's pretty much out of ammo. You can call this race over as much as you want, I say it's just beginning.
#5627 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
^^ That was after the third time he asked her the question. Besides James, you can put down text all you want. It's obvious when watching it live this woman has NO CLUE about international policy. Just own up to it. In fact, she sucks at it. It's as if she was memorizing this shit off of a 3x5 card last night. It's not really "What she says" as much as it is that we expect our VP to have a fundamental understanding of the worlds views and concepts, and how it all interacts.
This isn't high school where your given an oral exam and you were close on the facts, it's running for 2nd in command of our nation.
#5628 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
Hahaha, I seriously don't know which answer makes more sense??
#5629 Re: The Garden » Charles Gibson interviews Sarah Palin » 922 weeks ago
For the record, James Carville gave her a C-, and even stated he was grading on a curve due to her inexperience. Keep defending her James, keep blindly defending her.
#5630 Re: The Garden » More McCain /Palin/Karl Rove adss are false » 922 weeks ago
For anyone in the Obama campaign, or anyone else to complain because the McCain camp are spreading Internet rumors,
That's not exactly what's going on here in this article. This article states that factcheck.org said a few Palin rumors were proven false. However McCain made up a TV ad stating Obama's campaign has been "Absolutely false" and "proven wrong" by factcheck.org, when that isn't the case at all. In fact, McCain's ad is false & will now be proven wrong by Factcheck.org. How ironic is that?!
