You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#5901 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 919 weeks ago

bigbri wrote:

Again, the administrator of this site, James, called this old-vs.new debate dead in this thread. What don't you guys get through your fucking skulls?

He even made a thread for it so the simple-minded have a place to go to masturbate to their musical theories and rose-colored world.

http://www.gnrevolution.com/viewtopic.p … 850#p74850

Go there, bookmark it and have fun. Go the fuck at it, because I like to come to these threads to discuss the topic advertised. I wanted to do that tonight. Instead, I come here and see some of the most ridiculous, cocky posts I've seen at ANY fan forum.

If you really think that creating a thread is going to end the debate, I suggest you find a place that isn't at all GnR related to hang out.  James can create all the threads he wants and "end" all the debates he wants, someone is going to start them again. 

There's always the don't read it option - that should work for you.

#5902 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 919 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

The world is biased. My time on the internet over the past 10 years, countless media articles, concert experience, and YES, even discussions with GNR's band members and associates have led me to this assessment.

Consider it backed up.  Unless you just weren't clear and you meant reading these conversations.

#5903 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 919 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:

The world is biased. My time on the internet over the past 10 years, countless media articles, concert experience, and YES, even discussions with GNR's band members and associates have led me to this assessment.

LOL - just what we need...another insider.  Wonderful.

#5904 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 919 weeks ago

Again, it's you guys bringing up Slash.  I've never seen anybody that prefers the old band say that the songs would be great if Slash played on them.  I've seen people say that they'd like to see what he could do on the songs, but that is 2 different things. 

I've actually seen a pretty common theme regarding the new material.  Over-produced, too much going on, too many layers, etc.  Why don't the defenders of the new band ever address the real issues with the songs instead of making some up?  Do you want to know why people want to hear what Slash would come up with?  See the bolded section above...those weren't issues on most of the music Slash was on in GnR and he managed to overcome it and shine when it was an issue.

So instead of doing things to pick fights with the huge number of GnR fans that love Slash, why don't you actually address the issues with the new songs instead.  You're never going to get away from the old vs new debate no matter what you do as long as this is referred to as GnR.  Get over it and find good things to say about your version of GnR instead of attacking those that feel differently.

#5905 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 920 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:
buzzsaw wrote:

I got banned for being right and not being willing to let it go.  I got banned for demanding an apology that I knew I would never get.  That is well worth a banning.

You were temporarily banned for continually harassing a fellow member even after being warned. Let's not distort facts just to prove some point you have about 1991.

There is no distortion James.  I was banned because you weren't going to back down and neither was I, but you own the site, so you have the power.  Banning me was wrong whether you want to admit it or not and others in management have agreed with me.  Do we really have to go down that road again?  I received a lot more support than you know about.

#5906 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 920 weeks ago

No, that isn't it at all.  You guys keep making it about Slash, it's really about the songs themselves.  You guys keep bringing up Slash, not me.  I've said plenty of similar comments about Slash's post GnR work as I have about Axl's.  Neither of them is nearly as good without the other.

As for VR, I'd take most of the VR songs over these leaks even though i don't really care for either.  At least I can hear what's going on in the VR songs (though at times I wish I couldn't).  The only thing these leaks shit all over is themselves. 

If these leaks were the holy grail, cd would have been out a decade ago.  It's pretty common knowledge that the album was rejected by the label, even if it wasn't "officially" rejected.  None of these songs are new since then.  Put two and two together.

#5907 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Bumblefoot Interview (w/ Shackler's Info) » 920 weeks ago

Billy Preston was practically a 5th Beatle in the later years, wasn't he?  I thought he played on quite a few of their songs.

#5908 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 920 weeks ago

Before anyone in management starts chewing us out, other than a few personal references by both of us, this was actually a pretty good discussion (though probably the wrong place for it).  We've conversed through PMs and there is no problem here...nothing to see...move along.

#5909 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 920 weeks ago

war wrote:

so you would rather listen to my world and shotgn blues than twat and better?

i don't believe you but i respect your opinion

by the way you haven't responded to my pm

You didn't ask about TWAT and Better, but yes.  If I could get a stripped down TWAT and Better, that answer would change.  I can't listen to either song without cringing in their current format, but like the song structures and recognize the potential.

Your inbox is full, so I can't respond.  I used to, but I haven't in a long time...it got boring.

#5910 Re: Dust N' Bones & Cyborg Slunks » New GNR vs old GNR/ GNR vs Velvet Revolver thread » 920 weeks ago

Not wrong.  Maddy sucks ass, so I would take my world over it because even though it sucks, my world ends sooner. 

I actually like Better.  It is my 2nd favorite of the leaks after TWAT.  I would take any UYI demo (that I've heard) over either song.  If they could strip either Better or TWAT down, I think I would prefer those to some of the UYI/AFD songs, but as they stand today, I stick with my choice of the UYI demos.  I said this when I first heard them and I'm still saying it.  Too much going on, but a lot of potential with both songs.  My opinion has not changed a bit.  Clutter ruins every single one of these new band leaks.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB