You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#51 Re: Guns N' Roses » The thingamabob Axl needs to break out? » 495 weeks ago
Just coming from a basic knowledge of physiology and the snake oil that is the fitness market, I can very confidently state that this thing does not and could not do what it is claimed to. Maybe that's why Axl is fat, he's only working out 4 minutes a day lol. There are no short cuts, folks.
#52 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 496 weeks ago
I remember a vague "sources" rumor that Axl was retiring after the residency "because he doesn't have the voice to tour anymore." It'd be really bittersweet if that was what all this is and Axl was going into this as a farewell for those reasons. I hope he has the chops for this and it can grow.
#53 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 496 weeks ago
It seems Axl is friends with Kimmel. No reason otherwise that he'd have done the last appearance there, now this one. Aside from an awards show or something, its as good a place as any. Lots of viewers, relaxed atmosphere for both of them.
#54 Re: Guns N' Roses » Axl Rose To Talk "Guns N Roses" on Jmmy Kimmel Live(Not Happening) » 496 weeks ago
This keeps getting better. I'd almost assume someone is fucking with us lol
#55 Re: Guns N' Roses » I know we're all excited but... » 496 weeks ago
I think (somewhat fear) what he looks like physically on Kimmel will give us an idea as to whether he will be back to 06 form. Not expecting him to look like 2006 Axl, who frankly I believe was on the juice at that time, but something more svelte would be a good sign. I have no idea how new that "new" picture of Axl floating around is. All that said, only on a damn GN'R forum do fans give a shit enough to have to debate what shape the frontman will be (in). haha
#56 Re: Guns N' Roses » I know we're all excited but... » 496 weeks ago
Phalangeal dexterity and vocal abilities can't be compared when it comes to rate of decay. Should Axl still be able to sound 2006-ish? I THINK so, but I have nothing to base this off of. Having been in Atlanta both times in 2011, I'd say it was certainly possible 5 years ago, so I think he can. Your football team seemed well versed in dismantling Michigan State, so don't worry on that. bammer.
#57 Re: Guns N' Roses » Just an idea - its 3am, bear with me » 496 weeks ago
I could actually see that happening, Axl's got the sense of humor to see the awesomeness that that'd bring
#58 Re: Guns N' Roses » I know we're all excited but... » 496 weeks ago
I'd love this.Judging by that recent image and median of performances in between 2011-4, I'm bracing myself for something... less.
Just how it goes. If we're lucky, he'll consider this something more than a cashgrab.
14.5 weeks away from Coachella, that's more than plenty of time to get in good cardiovascular shape. Someone get that man some TRT and albuterol!
#59 Re: Guns N' Roses » I know we're all excited but... » 496 weeks ago
2006 Axl would be absolutely incredible. He comes out in that form vocally, and this will be a spectacular sight to behold.
#60 Re: Guns N' Roses » I know we're all excited but... » 496 weeks ago
Pissed? No, because nobody owes any of us jack shit. I'd be disappointed though, and not disappointed IN Axl, but FOR Axl. Before you call me an apologist, I frame this as such because I can not imagine someone with the artistic integrity that Axl unquestionably has coming out not ready on purpose or because he didn't give a fuck. Did he not give a fuck at times with the "new GN'R"? Frankly, I think so at times. Its a matter of getting divorced unwillingly and trying to convince yourself you're happy with the new chick when you know you're not fulfilled. This is probably much bigger to all of them than they'd admit, bigger than it is to us in some respects.
