You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#6341 Re: Guns N' Roses » There Was A Time (Lyrics) Fantastic » 949 weeks ago
I think this is the ONLY new song that could have a chance to be old band quality if Axl could get over himself and let the solo shine at the end. The lyrics aren't special and the music isn't very creative, but the solo at the end gives it a chance if you could actually hear it clearly over all the shit going on.
#6342 Re: Guns N' Roses » Claim About The Finished Album Sucking (Ross Halflin) » 949 weeks ago
JonathanvonDoom wrote:I'd like to know how this has deteriorated into a bloated pissing match for people to try and argue their opinions as fact with such condescending "I will word this better than you and therefore I am right" glee. Some of us like the leaks, really like them. Apparently some of us don't. That's all. I really, really like them. I'm not wrong. And so ... thank you. Go back to talking about the guy who claims to have the "finished" album.
I totally agree. I was thinking the same thing before I read your post. It's like how does a thread start the way this one did and then turn into me getting told (again) how superior Slash & BH are to GNR's current guitarists???
Getting back on track; Mick Wall and Ross Halfin are douches.
It ends up that way because it's how the majority of the people seem to feel. It's nothing personal and you're more than welcome to feel the way you feel. Just because most people don't agree with you doesn't mean you're wrong.
I'd like to know whay everybody in the media who won't lick Axl's nutsack gets called "douches" or some other senseless name. Instead of wasting time on those guys, why don't you address the people that are really the problem: Axl's yes men.
As for war, if the first 2 parts of something are so bad that you don't want to even listen to the rest, that's objectively saying it sucks. It doesn't take eating an entire field of onions to know that you don't like onions. It's your opinion he's not qualified or wrong, it's not a fact. Don't try to tell me what I'd agree with or how the recording process went because you know nothing about either subject. 
#6343 Re: Guns N' Roses » Claim About The Finished Album Sucking (Ross Halflin) » 949 weeks ago
I think Robin, Ron and Richards live versions of NR are as good or better then Slashs. Also, I think Ron does a fantastic job on the TWAT solo.
You're fine to think that, but based off of the quality of the songs those individuals have written that can hold a candle to NR, I'll have to disagree.
I'm a big believer in the creative process more than taking a great idea and attempting to improve on it. I could play a great NR solo now, but I doubt I could have come up with anything on my own that would have fit the song better than what we have. Any session musician can play a solo that somewhat fits the song, but they are session musicians because they can't write great music.
Slash saved NR and Estranged from being the pieces of crap that Axl envisioned. He made those songs OK for guys to listen to. Go read the lyrics of those songs and make them piano only songs...nothing against Elton John because I think he's a great performer, but that's what you would have had. BH saves TWAT and no matter how well anybody "fills in" that role, it can't replace the creativity that went into making the music.
#6344 Re: Guns N' Roses » Claim About The Finished Album Sucking (Ross Halflin) » 949 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:war wrote:even if he listened to the leaks he should have gotten past the second song. this is untrue or he is the most unqulaified person in the world to judge music. i gotta go out on a limb and say that the leaks are better than the rest of the music on that list. gunslinger and atari legend also bring up good reasons for why this is bullshit.
You're wrong. The songs we've heard aren't all that good. BH saves TWAT much like Slash saved NR and Estranged, and Better is an ok song. Other than that, the songs are overrated and overbloated pieces of crap. If it's the demos he's heard, I think he called it exactly right depending on which 2 songs he heard. If it's a final copy and the songs are as overproduced as the demos are, he's right there as well. The only chance these songs have of mainstream success is a stripped down version that's less than 5 minutes long. Even then, by the time the album is released, the majority of the fan base will consider them old songs.
Anyone that thinks that CD is going to change the music world better hope it's never released or they will find the results even more disappointing than the wait.
I am not wrong. Opinion is opinion, not fact. To be objective and still understand that this is still arguing over opinion is not wrong. You can't objectively rate something without listening to all of it rather than the first two parts. This guy is either unqualified or this isn't true. Either way, we shouldn't be worried about the quality of the album based on this. And saying buckethead saved twat is like saying guitar is the only important instrument in the band. He is great on it, yes. i agree but if it was a bad song the only thing that would save it was it being totally rewritten. On the contrary, the reason buckethead shines on it is because it was written accordingly (for his great soloing) It's not like they had this crappy song complete with no soloing on it and buckethead came in and said, "hey axl put that porno in the dvd. You know that crappy song you wrote called TWAT. i am gonna save it. It will be great when i am done with it."
Actually, you are wrong. You're wrong because you are stating something as fact that is an opinion...I just followed up on it to see your response, and it was what I would expect.
NR - Slash = snooze fest. TWAT - BH = not worth listening to in any way. If the song was written for BH to shine, we wouldn't have to hear Axl repeating the same stupid line over and over instead of the solo. I'm the last person to defend BH because I'm not much of a fan, but his outtro to TWAT is the only thing I've heard worthy of the name Guns N' Roses. The rest of it is just filler.
#6345 Re: Guns N' Roses » The Early Recording Process of CD? (With spoilers from Slash's Book) » 949 weeks ago
Thank goodness we have good old honest Axl to set the record straight. 
#6346 Re: Guns N' Roses » Claim About The Finished Album Sucking (Ross Halflin) » 949 weeks ago
even if he listened to the leaks he should have gotten past the second song. this is untrue or he is the most unqulaified person in the world to judge music. i gotta go out on a limb and say that the leaks are better than the rest of the music on that list. gunslinger and atari legend also bring up good reasons for why this is bullshit.
You're wrong. The songs we've heard aren't all that good. BH saves TWAT much like Slash saved NR and Estranged, and Better is an ok song. Other than that, the songs are overrated and overbloated pieces of crap. If it's the demos he's heard, I think he called it exactly right depending on which 2 songs he heard. If it's a final copy and the songs are as overproduced as the demos are, he's right there as well. The only chance these songs have of mainstream success is a stripped down version that's less than 5 minutes long. Even then, by the time the album is released, the majority of the fan base will consider them old songs.
Anyone that thinks that CD is going to change the music world better hope it's never released or they will find the results even more disappointing than the wait.
#6347 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mick Wall interview on the radio » 950 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:Pride&Glory wrote:He's just trying to make money on the name of Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses.
Why not? Isn't that exactly what the entire GnR camp is doing?
there is a huge difference. one relies on the other's success in order to use the name for his own, whether it's truthful or not, good or bad (mick wall). and the other is self sufficient (the entire gnr camp).
mick wall is selling gnr. gnr is selling itself.
Until they release their own music, new GnR is selling the old band. Same thing in my book...living off of someone else's accomplishments.
#6348 Re: Guns N' Roses » Which member do you respect the most? » 950 weeks ago
buzzsaw wrote:Are you kidding? Never intentionally lies? Who do you blame for all the lies coming out of the GnR camp, which is run ONLY by Axl?
If this is about release dates, then I think he believed in them at the time.
buzzsaw wrote:The band would have been nothing without him? Please. Slash was obviously on the radar at that point in the LA music scene and Izzy wrote or co-wrote pretty much all of AFD. Steven was a hanger on, but Duff is a talented musician and would have caught on somewhere. You sound a lot like Axl and Baz brainwashed you into believing this load of crap. I prefer NR and Estranged to a lot of the UYI songs, but to ignore the contributions Slash made to those songs is just ignorant. I'm pretty sure Axl even thanked him for Estranged in the liner notes.
If Axl wasn't there... "Snakepit" I know some love those albums, but that isn't what I loved in GNR, more specifically UYI II.
...Yeah I love Slash's playing but I think don't agree with his probable vision.
I know that you know that's not even close to the only lie coming from the GnR camp. If you're making the case that Axl actually believes all the lies, that's a completely different issue. That just means you're admitting he's batshit nuts.
Saying Slash's vision isn't what you prefer is much diferent than saying he'd have been nothing without Axl. I'd go so far as to say Axl would have been nothing without the AFD lineup and specifically Izzy and Slash pushing Axl to do something. Look what Axl's accomplished since those guys left. Nothing. I don't think that's a coincidence.
#6349 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mick Wall interview on the radio » 950 weeks ago
He's just trying to make money on the name of Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses.
Why not? Isn't that exactly what the entire GnR camp is doing?
#6350 Re: Guns N' Roses » Which member do you respect the most? » 950 weeks ago
William Axl Rose
He wrote and crafted some of the most beautiful & Rock N' Roll music ever made. To me the band through it's various incarnations would be nothing without this guys vision.
If Slash and the other guys were left to rule the roost over the UYI direction, we never would have had "Estranged" or "November Rain". Those are the songs that I love, I prefer the deep and meaningful, pretentious or not.He never intentionally lies. He believes in what he says, and he obviously chosen music over money.
As for his spiritual believes, what's wrong with them. I believe the same things to a certain extent.....And... apart from that here is like 14 years later still hung up, on some woman he used to know, that's true love for you, you don't accept and you don't move on, you get pissed.
Are you kidding? Never intentionally lies? Who do you blame for all the lies coming out of the GnR camp, which is run ONLY by Axl?
The band would have been nothing without him? Please. Slash was obviously on the radar at that point in the LA music scene and Izzy wrote or co-wrote pretty much all of AFD. Steven was a hanger on, but Duff is a talented musician and would have caught on somewhere. You sound a lot like Axl and Baz brainwashed you into believing this load of crap. I prefer NR and Estranged to a lot of the UYI songs, but to ignore the contributions Slash made to those songs is just ignorant. I'm pretty sure Axl even thanked him for Estranged in the liner notes.
