You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#651 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash Speaks! » 403 weeks ago

misterID wrote:

I think the "jumping into" the existing material is more believable.

It would make a lot of sense.

I mean why would Axl just abandon songs he's already written, not to mention some of them would have strong vocal tracks.

However I think we need to put on our waiting caps, some of the other interviews with Slash he kinda gave the impression he would tour the rest of this year, then most of next with conspirators. Then after that it might be time for another GNR cycle.

#652 Re: Guns N' Roses » LEAKS THREAD » 403 weeks ago

I would have used Robin as the Rhythm player and let him play an occasional lead - such his stuff on Better, SOD etc.

Sort of like Brad Whitford - he isn't joe perry but yet plays quite a few of the more memorable leads.

I think Robin's CD solos were pretty good, but he simply wasn't good at emulating slash's parts. I'm not sure if it was by design or simply that he didnt have the chops...but it was a major problem considering something like 90% of the set was Slash parts.

They could have left the Slash leads to someone more suited to the style, then let Robin do his lead licks on the 'new' songs.

I think this would have got the band over a lot better with the general public...a huge amount of the "Axl and the guys who aint slash" reviews were simply because the guitar parts often sounded worse than local cover bands.

#653 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash Speaks! » 404 weeks ago

apex-twin wrote:
monkeychow wrote:

it kinda suggested that 5'oclock is somehow an inferior album out of Slash's solo stuff.

Which is, objectively, complete bollocks.

ITFOCS features some of Slash's best guitar work. If anything, it's a worthy piece of his discography.

Absolutely.

There's a very GNR sound to his guitar parts on the album I think.

Probably his most GNR sounding solo record along with AL - which also has a number of "could be UYI" style tracks to me.

#654 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash Speaks! » 404 weeks ago

ClaudeF wrote:

Does anyone else disagree with the article's statement that Slash's first solo album was a "sign of doom" for GNR at the time it was released? To me, it felt like he and Duff were biding their time, waiting for a reunion that just never happened. Not until later did the news break that Axl was working on his own.

Yeah at the time Slash was selling it to the media as a project he did to fill in time before they all regrouped for GNR.

In retrospect I guess it does look like why not just make a GNR album then, but I agree at the time it was very much treated as a side project because Slash is a workaholic rather than the end of GNR.

I also didn't really like the question about 5'oclock where he said Axl and Duff rejected the material and does slash now agree with them. Slash kinda avoided it by saying they were just things he worked on rather than ever officially GNR. Aside from the fact that that is not the way it's presented in either his own book or duffs - or Axl's chats - I really didn't like the question - it kinda suggested that 5'oclock is somehow an inferior album out of Slash's solo stuff.

If anything I think time has shown those songs should have been GNR songs...

Myself I think it's one of his best albums, and I absolutely think those riffs if they'd been able to co-operate with Axl to alter the songs would have made a killer AFD-style record. Axl says slash insisted he sing them as is and was given no chance to work on them, Slash says Axl wasn't interested in them and he didn't want to waste another few years tinkering. Probably both true in some way. But in any event...the guitar playing on that album is very GNR.

#655 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Sopranos » 404 weeks ago

bigbri wrote:

Never watched.

Should I binge it?


If you like Gangster stuff - like Goodfellas, Casino that type of thing I would absolutely give it a shot.

#656 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses tour to continue through 2017(and beyond) » 405 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:

The old "but Axl's getting too old and his voice is deteriorating" chestnut is magnificently irrelevant, really.

Not really...by many accounts there's only a few songs in the vault that had finished vocals....those would be good...but I wouldn't be surprised if Axl is unable to perform live at all in a few more years.

Just like Ac/Dc I think they have literally one more 3-5 year cycle in them and that's it.

#657 Re: Guns N' Roses » Guns N' Roses tour to continue through 2017(and beyond) » 405 weeks ago

elevendayempire wrote:
johndivney wrote:

There is no new music.

Nah, it's coming. Like I said: when they need to give the tour a shot in the arm 'cause they've hit every region and interest is flagging... then we'll start hearing rumblings.

I want to believe that... but when is that exactly? Like first they can do the entire world over again just playing large arenas rather than stadiums. That's a further 3 year cycle from now.

Then they need to do something new. But something new could be some sort of UYI celebration or really anything that involves not doing new music very easily. Or co-headlining with a major act or something.

Or maybe just take a 3 year break then do the same thing as this cycle again. Or semi-retire but come out for big shows if the offer price is right - big festival gigs etc.

Without wanting to come off negative, there's reasonable evidence that 2018 Axl doesn't have the vocal power 2016 Axl did.

He's 56 and struggling to perform to the level he expects of himself, it makes you wonder if he would attempt the same stuff at 66, or if he would just retire from the loot from these tours. So if you think Axl might have 10 years left to really do anything, then factor in the 2 or 3 year retooling time between anything, and it looks like maybe we have one or two more cycle/projects left.

I hope i'm wrong.

#658 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Sopranos » 405 weeks ago

This is probably one of my favourite shows ever. Great story great actors.

I always felt though that it kinda lost its way a little bit by the end - although the writing overall is some of the best ever on TV - I felt it got a bit patchy here and there.

Like Tony's gambling problem felt like it came out of nowhere, its realistic he may have had an issue with gambling, but it seemed to suddenly develop with no clue in previous seasons. The artsy dream sequences were kinda a cool twist to get in tony's head but I felt it went a bit far when whole episodes devoted to surrealism. There's also a couple of smaller side story threads that seem to start then don't develop into anything which is kinda weird.

Love the show though.

#659 Re: Guns N' Roses » LEAKS THREAD » 406 weeks ago

I'm in the minority but I like the album additions. I kinda wish it was mixed/mastered a little hotter overall or something - but performance wise I like the final record.

The remixed TIL vocals make me wonder if it was a TIL version that was swapped - as there's obviously different versions of those vocals around.

#660 Re: The Sunset Strip » Halloween (2018) » 406 weeks ago

I'm excited for it.

Love the whole franchise.

Sort of glad to see it go back to it's roots too - like the Zombie ones were fun in their own way for something different but I much prefer this to a 3rd zombie version.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB