You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#681 Re: Guns N' Roses » Alan Niven interview 01-08- 2016 » 564 weeks ago

apex-twin wrote:

Still the best description I've ever read.

"And after each line he is gazing at the crowd with those strangely startled yet fearless eyes, as though we had just surprised him in his den, tearing into some carrion."

That's how he's been in life, as well.


Wonderful


This + John's most recent post, pretty much sums it up nicely... in other words -- Axl Rose lives in his own world



Regardless of any myth

#682 Re: Guns N' Roses » Something is up with Pitman » 564 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

Pitman is a poor man's teddy zig zag that knows synth and pro tools. Nothing more. Remember that.


Oh bullshit. Jimmy is right above. Pitman in reality is kind of producing the show, as well as producing the albums, as well as being, well... Mother Goose.

I agree that GN'R with Slash and 3 guitarists is pointless, because Slash is an equal star to Axl. Think of it like this, do you think it would make ANY sense to bring in Myles Kennedy to sing some Slash solo & VR songs, while Axl took a powder? No. Why? Because Axl Rose is the fucking rock star people are paying to see. No different than Slash. This isn't like going to see Guns in 2002, or 2006-07, or 2009-14. Slash is GNR's LEAD guitarist.

Even if Axl's going to unearth some new Chinese songs and throw in maybe This I Love & SOD from Chinese I with Slash on lead, I still think in a live setting the songs will be re-tooled to feature Slash on lead, as he is a star equaled to Axl. He's not going to be sidelined to highlight Fortus, no matter the fact Richard was in the band for going on 15 years, and Slash was only there for 11, and now starting a 12th I assume.

Pitman ain't going nowhere SG. Even though I were prefer if JUST Dizzy Reed was back there. I think GN'R will see a 2 guitarists config again, before we see a 1 keyboardist config. jmho

#683 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 564 weeks ago

Will wrote:

I've only heard Snakepit 1 & 2, and Contraband. That was more than enough for me to not bother wasting money on Slash CD's anymore 16 If there on Spotify I'll give them a listen tomorrow as Ive heard he has a couple of killer songs (Anastasia is one I always see mentioned)


This. SG is just ball bustin' me. The reality is Myles on his best day and Axl on his worst... is no Axl Rose. Myles does sing SCOM better than Axl these days, but even on Appetite For Democracy, I would've taken that SCOM over most Myles/Slash performances.

With all these GN'R with Slash, Duff, Dave & Matt rumors, and with Scott's death, I actually dug up and listened to VR with all the fans talking about their memories of VR... and.... wow.... VR HAS NOT aged well AT ALL.

Contraband is a little better than I originally gave it credit for. I loathed it in 2004. I still don't think it holds a candle to Chinese, but there are some solid songs on there... for their time. One of the main issues which plagues Contraband is it very much sounds like a record with singles from 2004. The album is not near what Slash fans make it out to be, and I actually think Slash's 2010 solo record is superior to it, but of those two, they are without a doubt the closest Slash has came since 1993 of re-capturing his Guns glory.


Libertad is a fucking drink coaster. That album was a waste of computer hard drive space in whatever studio they recorded it in. Scott phones it in and sounds wasted and uninterested even on the record, and most of the songs blend together and are VERY forgettable.

Bucket, even with his 800 albums a year, i'd take Bucket's solo records ANY DAY of the week over Slash's.




P.S.

For all you Gunners looking to catch up on what the returning old Guns were doing since 1990-1993...

My recommendations:

Slash -- VELVET REVOLVER: Contraband (2004) & Slash (2010)
Izzy -- IZZY & THE JU JU HOUNDS (1992) and honorable mention to 117 Degrees (1998)
Duff -- DUFF: Believe In Me (1993) & VELVET REVOLVER: Contraband (2004)
Steven -- ADLER: Back From The Dead (2012)
Matt -- THE CULT: Beyond Good and Evil (2001)



All of those are solid records. Solid. My favorites of the bunch are actually Duff's Believe in Me & Steven's Back From The Dead. But all of them are solid.


You really need nothing else other than those records. That is a definitive collection of all of their post-GN'R stuff.

#684 Re: Guns N' Roses » Looks like rehearsals have started! » 564 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

James, even Axlin16 listened to all of World on Fire for me. Some awesome riffage


Jesus Christ I knew you wouldn't let that die. Lol, I get high one day and blow through World On Fire, and give you my thoughts and you use it to promote Slash's albums practically. I guess it's a compliment... haha


When Slash gets around to the re-release with bonus tracks, SG is gonna be promotin' like a mother fucker...

SLASH: World On Fire -- Reloaded: Deluxe Limited Edition

"AWESOME!" -- Blabbermouth

"Album of the year!" -- Classic Rock Magazine

"Best Slash album since GN'R" -- MelodicRock.com

"Goes great with head" -- Eddie Trunk

"Has some nice riffage. Myles falsetto is okay on some songs" -- Axlin16


BUY IT TODAY!!!!









14 15 16

#685 Re: Guns N' Roses » Alan Niven interview 01-08- 2016 » 564 weeks ago

apex-twin wrote:
Axlin16 wrote:

I would believe Axl is a legendary tyrannical uber-dick... but "high functioning Asperger's" ? No.

We only have his past behaviour from which to draw general guidelines. A DSRM classification is just one way of describing a quantity of things linked to his personal viewpoint on life. If anything, for sure.

A case can be made that in the past, Axl has repeatedly had issues with interpersonal security. These issues have caused him with possible stress and anxiety and have strained his various relationships, working and otherwise. The source of such issues can often be tracked back to an unhappy childhood. Feeling neglected by one's parents is often a contributing factor. Axl, by his own account, had an unhappy childhood.

Another defining factor is Axl's combativeness. In the face of adversity, it's as if someone violates his personal world. Very often, middle ground has been brushed aside and he's come out, fuming.

The key to this may be that every time a stress point hits a chord with a remembrance of past trauma, Axl leaps into a defensive mode, as his very own is at stake. Often he attacks the close to him, because he may feel (rightly or not) that they have betrayed his trust, while knowingly existing in his personal world.

If you ask me, sorry for his issues, but he should just grow a bit more of that business layer on his skin.


I agree, but despite whatever David Bowie and/or Mick Jagger told him about being a business man first, Axl is still an artist, a performer, passionate, and driven purely by emotion.

Those people NEVER do well in business. They take EVERYTHING personal, everything is an attack on them, and they retreat into emotional surrender, then come back roaring like a lion, and even more restrictive and untrusting then they were before.


Thank goodness Axl went into the business that he did, and that he didn't become a mob kingpin or some criminal figurehead. I have no doubt he would've been a BRUTAL and RUTHLESS bossman. He would've taken everything personally, everything was an attack on him and his "family", and he would've paid it back in oceans of blood. He's a very reactive guy, and wouldn't have trusted anyone imo.


Maybe all of what you said Apex is a step in the right direction. Maybe Axl getting that softer touch and thicker skin underneath is the reason Slash is back in the band to begin with. Axl is letting go of his demons. That's a good thing... hopefully.

#686 Re: Guns N' Roses » Alan Niven interview 01-08- 2016 » 564 weeks ago

johndivney wrote:

You do know wrestling isn't real, right? That stone cold Steve Austin was just a character created by someone & not actually a real person, yea?


I know the inside and out workings how how wrestling is a work, how it's executed, film, shot, promo'ed, etc. It was an example of personal characterization. Axl HAS TO BE fully aware of his perception and what people's first impressions of him are. NONE OF US are here in 2016, still talking ad naseum, over what motivates Slash. Izzy? Maybe. But it's all about Axl still, and it's because will still can't quite nail down what he's gonna do.

Part of it's fascinating. Part of it's frustration. But it's all the same. I've said it many times... Axl is the most consistent person in the band. Consistently inconsistent.

Axl has to be aware of how we perceive him, and I certainly think he gets a kick out of his outlaw rock star persona, and certainly plays it up, as well as makes decisions based on how it will be perceived by the fans and the media. How could he not? He has to know he gets more headlines and free publicity playing him what the media and fans portray him as, rather than coming out and releasing a book with a picture of him cuddling and playing with Dexter on the front cover and talking about his love of kittens and how he's just a pussycat at heart.

He knows "W. Axl Rose" has a legendary status as a crazy rock star, and he plays that up. He's embraced his character anti-hero, rock babyface + heel persona years ago. The Stone Cold character, no different than Axl, Axl is literally the only other person I know that is a notorious heel that doesn't play by anyone's rules, and literally with a couple of verses of a song can completely flip and audience into rooting for him as a babyface, and have them hate him again as soon as they leave the show.


He's a one of a kind sum bitch.

#687 Re: Guns N' Roses » Salon Reunion article » 564 weeks ago

I've spent years comparing live boots from the '87-'93 era to the 2001-present era. I primarily grew up in the latter. I personally feel there's a, frankly obvious, benefit to the use of 3 guitars live. The songs pound-for-pound sound richer and fuller in a live setting with 3 guitarists versus back in the day with 2 guitarists. Slash, Duff & Gilby all said how hard some of the Illusion arrangements were to duplicate in a live setting with just Slash & Gilby. Many of the songs sound like they are missing additional rhythm, which they are. Axl allowing the band to all share different solos is simply out of indulgence and being fair to all of them (DJ, Ron & Richard).

Obviously the situation is MUCH different with Slash back on board. He wrote all of those solos and other stuff as well. He's going to be playing all his material and thensome.

The better question is, what happens with the Chinese material. If the rumors are true, they are practicing that material. Is Slash going to revert to Bucket/Ron's role on those songs, and let Richard take lead, with a different guy on full-time rhythm, like Izzy or Dave?

Obviously the plan was simply for the 2 guitarists config with just Robin/Paul, and Bucket changed that. But Axl kept it for a reason, and I don't think it was "Bucket material that Ron could play". Somewhere along the line Axl started to prefer the 3 guitarists config, despite critical and fan disdain for it.

For the record... I prefer just Slash on lead, and Richard/Izzy on rhythm, and going back to the traditional Guns live sound.

#688 Re: Guns N' Roses » Doug Goldstein Interview 12-01-2016 » 565 weeks ago

Niven is not a very credible source... Goldstein makes Niven look like the voice of God

#689 Re: Guns N' Roses » Salon Reunion article » 565 weeks ago

I understand and see your point now. If they do a 3-guitar deal, especially in studio, Axl's not going to allow Richard to walk, and Slash is far more likely to want to write with Kush (if Izzy's not there), than he is someone else.

Still would be curious if Axl would consider moving Richard to Lead 2, and put Tommy Stinson on rhythm to sub-in for Izzy, AND if Slash would be willing to write with Tommy.

#690 Re: Guns N' Roses » Something is up with Pitman » 565 weeks ago

James Lofton wrote:
polluxlm wrote:

If you already have Axl, Slash and Duff on stage? Would anyone give a rats ass if Nick Mason was part of a PF reunion? Looks like they didn't even care that Waters was missing back in 94.

The AFD lineup allows it to be marketed as an AFD reunion. Take one of those guys out of the equation and it cant be. If Izzy isn't along for the ride then there's zero point in bringing in Adler. If they don't want to or care about an AFD reunion then it can just be pushed as a reunion in general with the band's biggest stars upfront which looks to be how they are going to do it.

Its all in the presentation.


I'm also fairly certain the general public doesn't even know that Axl has been touring a different lineup for the past 16 years. They just think they broke up when Slash left.
Maybe if you gently prod someone you could coax a vague memory of something that happened in 2002 at an award show, but that's it.]

You might be exaggerating just a tad but I do agree that the CD era didn't really do much if any damage on pop culture's radar and you're right about the 02 VMA's being something that would likely get mentioned first. That was HUGE for about a week. People talked more about that comeback medley than they did the album's release.

Might get a music nerd to remember that 2003 IRS Trump leak. That made some waves but died when nobody could hear it.

edit: Oh yeah...Rio 01. Big news. US magazines covered that event. 2001... the year that this whole Chinese shindig should have started and finished.

and Buckethead. Ask anyone who was in the band 97-15 his name will be at the top of the list. Stinson second. The rest are tied for third.


Dude, the only people griping for the original AFD 5 are the absolute diehards. 95% of the general public, if not closer to 99% consider a reunion STRICTLY Axl & Slash.

Even when speaking of the new band, TONS of commenters on these websites I had viewed posted "fuck Buckethead" or "fuck Buckethead, finally a real guitarist" type comments when Bucket hasn't even been in GN'R for 12 years, possibly longer.


That's how utterly clueless the general public is. If GN'R tour with an AFD/UYI configuration lineup, it'll be strictly as a tip of the cap to the fans. Nothing more imo.

Because GN'R could still command top-dollar with just Axl & Slash (maybe not $4mil for festivals, but probably $2.5-3mil).

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB