Every time you think it can't get more idiotic, it does.  Keep going guys.  This version of reality is way more interesting than the real one.

Welcome to politics mitch.  You should have been paying attention long before Trump and none of this would be surprising to you.

It's a complete cop out.  Far, far, far more men own up to their responsibility than don't. On top of that, I know quite a few men that have been completely screwed over by the mother in terms of access to the child while the mother blows the money on their own things instead of the child's. 

My wife's family has/had a deadbeat dad, though it did take some time to sort out which kids were actually his (and it wasn't all 3) - I believe he is all caught up now.  They also have a girl that got pregnant on purpose (or so it appears) to trap someone.  My side of the family had someone take in someone's daughter that wasn't theirs and treat her like his own even though he's not with the mother any more.  I've seen all kinds of things happen (both good and bad).  This generalization that men just bail on kids all the time is such a falsehood...if you want to carry on with the generalization, you can make it even more offensive by looking at various cultures and how often it happens in some cultures vs others.  It's a stereotype for a reason...it happens and it's unfortunate when it happens.  But like every other stereotype, it's not an automatic and it's still the exception and not the rule. 

I'm pro-choice, but I do believe there should be restrictions to protect everyone's rights instead of just the mother's.  I don't know how to do that though.  It's really hard to balance out everyone's rights on issues like this.  This is why I get so frustrated when people act like these are such clear issues...no, they aren't.  I don't think the mother should get a free pass to just do whatever they want regardless of anyone esle's feelings that are involved. 

So what's the solution?  I don't know.  Rape, incest, legitimate health risk to the mother or unborn?  As long as it's certified as such, go for it.  Thinking out loud, maybe something like this for the less clear cut cases: If you want to say the unborn have no rights, I might be able to get onboard with that, but if you're in a relationship, the father should have to sign off on any abortion (not plan b or something like that, an actual abortion procedure).  If he's not willing to, he has to be willing to sign on for full responsibility for the child.  There are probably reasons I'm not thinking of that it wouldn't work, but at least I'm trying to come up with a reasonable compromise instead of just dismissing any case for one.

It's one day.