You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#931 Re: Guns N' Roses » Time for the reunion » 646 weeks ago

I wouldn't care if Axl was fat on stage or not. He's much more in key with his 80's image today, with the rest of them, then he was in 2002 when he was trying to urban.


It's the voice. If Axl can get into vocal shape--yes. If not, no. Leave the memory alone. Don't ruin it. With Axl's voice where it is right now, i'd much rather him climb back into a studio for many years and just record new music with the new band, and occasionally tour, rather than a reunion or another tour period. Not until he gets better vocally.

#932 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 646 weeks ago

Mikkamakka wrote:
AtomsNest wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:

I see your point a little more now. But just because Slash "works" in the business, doesn't mean Axl doesn't "work" either. While Slash has recorded, from my perspective of Axl back in the day to know, Axl seemed to be spending all of his time on spirituality, finding his place in existence, and wanting to know every tick about how the universe works. He is far more intellectual today than he was back in the day.


And I find that just as valuable as Slash having a "sweat of your brow" mentality.

lol What makes you say this? It sounds like fanfiction to me. Has Axl given an interview where he's discussed such thing? Maybe I missed it.

You missed it. New Friend Mushroom told him this all.

Axlin, this was probably the trippiest, out of this universe, out of reality post I've ever read on a message board. Good job.


Good--then it worked, haha. 22



Btw, you guys missed it then if you don't know what i'm talking about.


Back in the late 1990s there were rampant rumors that Axl very much lived a secluded life of no partying, lots of books, and self-loathing. He also sought spiritual advice from psychics, as well as the infamous Yoda (Sharon Maynard) of the Southwest U.S. desert for spiritual advice as well. Axl visited China around the early 2000's I believe as a spiritual retreat for inspiration for Chinese Democracy, and the last time he'd probably be allowed to visit the country before the album's release and eventually banning by the government.

Axl soaked up books, universal beliefs, psychic shit, psychology, philosophy, art, world music, all kinds of stuff in his down time during this period, when...


Slash was just fucking recording and recording. Gettin' shit done. Sweat of your brow. Axl was finding himself and his sanity, trying to have the youth of discovering himself, that he never had.

Even Axl's writing style changed from the heyday, to the present. He became a much more affluent, high-style writer and speaker, something obviously more self-aware of themself during that time.


I value both Axl & Slash's choices during this period.


Now my opinion of WHY Axl did it, is based on his words in interviews, as well as my interpretation of it. But all of the stuff I listed about was in the various interviews and speculatory articles over the last 15 years or so of Axl Rose.

axl

#933 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 646 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:

I haven't met ONE person in at least 15 years that has said a positive thing about Slash outside of these boards, I swear on my life.

I don't doubt you there, but wow, really...?

Maybe Australian fans see things differently, but I always hear Slash spoken of in good light.
He seems to get a pass on all the collaborations you say he gets laughed at, because generally casual fans still see him as a great player regardless.

I don't agree with the Slash's Fergie collabs any more than Axl's insistence to put fucking stupid pointless hip hop beats on CD song intros, but you can't say that whatever collaboration Slash plays on, he's not bringing that Slash style to the table.

And yeah, you're probably right, Slash gets himself out there and works the media to his advantage, but I don't see that as being a media whore.
He's impressively built  his own "Slash" brand outside of the huge GN'R brand, and I think he deserves some credit for that.

I guess most other Aussies see it that way too.

I will agree with you that the two biggest regions of Slash supporters I have met, have been Aussies and South Americans (who also adore Axl), but those two regions love Axl & Slash, whether in GN'R or solo or a rebooted GN'R. They just love 'em, and whatever they do.

I don't think anybody I have met doubts Slash's ability, just WHAT he's playing. His new melodies, style, just ain't blowing people away.


Ironically, just after I made that post (maybe God wanted to call my bluff?) anyways a few days later I met, not one, but TWO fans who adored Slash and Myles Kennedy as well, calling them very talented and love their new stuff, and the song "World On Fire" (is that correct?) very much so.

That's a first for me. Everyone else had negativity. There seemed to be more positivity towards Slash when it was Contraband and VR with STP's Weiland, but after Chinese (much to my shock) the tide turned around me on the streets to being a bit more sympathetic to Axl, and far more critical of Slash, especially with Kennedy sans Weiland.

Lomax wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:

I haven't met ONE person in at least 15 years that has said a positive thing about Slash outside of these boards, I swear on my life.

It's the same here. A friend lately pointed out that Slash is still trading on old Guns N Roses  20 years  while the last Guns N Roses Album (chi dem) doesn't even trade on Guns N Roses. He does tend to shy away from mixing things up a little which is a shame. He plays it too safe.

And you nailed it. That was the biggest complaint. Slash seemed to play everything too safe, and almost every complaint I heard, said the exact same thing related to feeling Slash was just playing it too safe. I actually felt bad for Slash, because Slash was in the same spot as Axl. If Slash tried something traditional to his roots, it was too "been there, done that", and if Slash tried something out of left field, he'd get the same response Axl got.

I think the complaining about it being too safe was primarily in the moves Slash made. If Slash recorded old style music, he'd bring in "safe" choices like Chris Cornell or Ozzy Osbourne or even a Sebastian Bach. I think an Ian Astbury, or even a female singer was a far more ballsy move. But even when he brought in a female singer (Lzzy Hale), it was always someone safe like Lzzy (Halestorm), a very radio ready rock band. Or Myles Kennedy (Alter Bridge) or Corey Taylor (Stone Sour-version). M. Shadows and Kid Rock are just as predictable.

But when he branched out to pop... he still went mainstream with Fergie and the Black Eyed Peas.

I saw their point, but I started to get a feeling that Slash could not please them regardless. It seemed like a damned if you do, damned if you don't move. The most love I saw expressed towards him was the early conception of Velvet Revolver. I think people were genuinely excited to hear Stone Temple Pilots meets Guns N' Roses with Weiland fronting basically UYI-era GN'R. What an interesting combo.

Then it happened, and it just wasn't that good. When it was recognizable and anthemic, it was boring, safe, and borderline-pop at their best moments, and when it was riskier, it just wasn't written all that well and forgettable.


At least that was the general consensus I saw. It got worse after Chinese came out and people made the comparisons. That's not to say Chinese didn't have alot of haters, but there were far more supporters than even I imagined their would be in the post-Chinese era, especially back during the Contraband-era.

Cramer wrote:
metallex78 wrote:

Maybe Australian fans see things differently, but I always here Slash spoken of in good light.


Here too. Slash, always seems to be viewed as the cool guy, Axl always the dick. Any casual fan I talk to.


Oh it's still totally that way. Don't get me wrong, when I say "love Axl", it was "loved Chinese Democracy" or "most of it". They still very much hated Axl and blamed Axl as the reason Guns N' Roses "broke up", and the reason "GN'R won't get back together". They hated him for it.

But with Chinese they seemed to go, "but that album was still the better rock record i've heard in awhile" was the general consensus. They seemed to hate Axl, but give him a pass for "not selling out like Slash did".


Of course now with Budweiser City, Hard Rock Vegas, DJ Ashba.... Axl's street cred is probably history with these same people.

#934 Re: Guns N' Roses » Budweiser City » 646 weeks ago

I for one gave $la$h major hell for selling out in the way he did. It's one thing to participate in American Idol to perform with other artists and pass down your musical knowledge, re-working songs and the like, like Queen did. It's a total nother just using the platform to hawk your wares and new album n' shit. It's lame.


Slash sold out to anybody with a paycheck. Granted he didn't have GN'R still to fall back on, he DIDN'T have a successful touring act at that point, and he had a family at home. Regardless of his motivations, it was lame. Guitar Hero didn't bother me as much, as I enjoyed the game, and I thought it was Slash's way of connecting to a new generation. That's fine. But the corporate thing bothers me.


I gave Axl credit for never making that move. Until now. Axl sold out. Whatever rock n' roll rebel image and all his wordy, infamous "Axl says a ton of... nothing" gibber gabber he's known for, and all this shit about spirituality and all the stuff that makes Axl--Axl, just flew out the door with this. Regardless of how much Bud he drinks, or how big of a check they cut him. Going out with your rebel image, something you've somewhat maintained, despite all the "Sell out" claims, he still had that enigma label. But to sell out, and not just sell out, but to one of the biggest corporations out there....


I'll be informing Anonymous of his information

#935 Re: The Sunset Strip » Phantasm V » 648 weeks ago

I think the film itself as a concept is smarter than even Coscarelli himself could write it. I think of Phantasm in the sense of, what if the film had tackled Jung's dark archetypes and dream analysis theories, but pushed it beyond just the easy cop out of hell or purgatory like so many others. The possibilities are endless, now.


Maybe with all the explosion of comic-themed TV series lately... Phantasm might work better as a weekly series that brings you back each with, with new situations, new dreams, new discoveries, more questions and hypotheticals for the audience to ponder, all the while discovering more about the Tall Man, and the overall series being the hunt to bring him down.

Sounds like a better concept for something like this, rather than trying to do a 2-hour reboot movie. The base concept is just too deep to pack into a cheap B-movie. The source material deserves ALOT more than it got.

#936 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 648 weeks ago

I see your point a little more now. But just because Slash "works" in the business, doesn't mean Axl doesn't "work" either. While Slash has recorded, from my perspective of Axl back in the day to know, Axl seemed to be spending all of his time on spirituality, finding his place in existence, and wanting to know every tick about how the universe works. He is far more intellectual today than he was back in the day.


And I find that just as valuable as Slash having a "sweat of your brow" mentality.

#937 Re: Guns N' Roses » GnR in Vegas 2014 » 648 weeks ago

Both performances are spot fucking on. Axl must be trying harder. I hope he keeps this voice going into the future, it's the best we probably can hope for.


That might be the best live performance of Prostitute i've ever heard. That song is something they always struggle to pull off live.

#938 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 648 weeks ago

I believe Slash plays better technically, but doesn't have the same feel imo. I don't feel the same soul from his modern songs, that I did from his GN'R stuff. Where is the heart?

A player's player... i'll take your word for it. I'm just telling you my experience. And I will also agree that Slash gets called for collab work more often, which proves he's a team player more than anything. Just because people call you, don't mean your right, or a good guy. It just means you're a reliable session player, at the least. If he's all the other thing, ding ding for him and the people around him.


Axl not getting calls, doesn't do anything to his reputation other than Axl didn't pick up the phone. Axl shot his own foot off with this. He alluded in this Revolver intereview that "nobody calls" for these kind of performance shows, and it has nothing to do with his voice. Axl basically spent 20 years NOT PICKING UP THE PHONE when it rang, or blowing off the whole thing, declining work, etc. His reputation got blown way out of proportion, because for as rebellious as all those Seattle rockers are---every last one of them are total conformists, except maybe that original guitarist dude from Nirvana.

Now Axl wants to cry foul because of a lack of support now that suddenly he's on Valium and Vicodin on a daily basis and feels great, and suddenly he wants to get back involved in the music scene... doesn't work that way and the music scene makes that clear. Slash put his dues in, taking it up the ass when need be and knowing who not to piss off. Axl tried to dare be an original. Biz don't work that way, and Axl is no exception. Axl tried to fight and win and a war, nobody has ever won. Not him, not the Sex Pistols, not Pearl Jam vs. Ticketmaster, etc. Axl tried to circumvent the business and the machine, and his reward?


They fucking buried him.

And to get out?


Axl kept digging deeper and deeper with his own personality and insecurities.


Slash on the other hand supplied his own spit and took one for the team. Slash likes being a celebrity, and that is why he's where he is. Celebs get press, celebs get assistence, celebs are seen. Axl WANTED to vanish, and that's exactly what he got. That doesn't mean he's wrong, as much as I wish he had released more music.

#939 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 648 weeks ago

Smoking Guns wrote:

Axlin12, usually agree, but you took a huge gulp of some Axl juice before your last post. In fact I remember you praising Standing in the Sun as well.


Spoken like a true Slashite. Thanks for proving my point Smoking Guns.




You Slash nutswingers here...


"Slash rules, Axl sucks" = Truth

"Slash sucks, Axl has potential" = swallowing Axl man juice



And yes, that is the exact logic used here, and elsewhere with you Slash fans. As for Standing in the Sun, it is literally the ONLY Myles song I can remember liking. Even Back From Cali got old, and I never got the fan-fare for Starlight. I far preferred his other non-Myles stuff, such as Ghost, and the tracks with Chris Cornell and M. Shadows, and I think there was one other.

But do I think it was Use Your Illusion-follow up material? Maybe Ghost, and that's it. There was one other session work collab he did with a no-name that was pretty good, that sounded like a sequel to Estanged. There are far more tracks on Chinese, that even with ONE album, I am glad Axl has the rights to the name ANY FUCKING DAY than Slash.


I feel far safer hearing album leaks by GN'R with DJ & Buckethead than I ever will having nightmares thinking of GN'R albums with Izzy & Myles Kennedy. Ugh. I'd rather Slash beg M. Shadows to join him. And I disagree with Bri on the "pop" thing. Slash wants to be popular, but not overshadowed. If Slash truely wanted to make pop music, there are far more talented vocalists to call, such as Shadows, or Corey, or hell even an Aaron Lewis.

I do agree with Bri, that I have ALWAYS wanted Slash to do an instrumental album. That's where his strength lies.


bigbri wrote:

I  just wish Slash would grow some balls and record an instrumental album. Shit could be better than any Buckethead CD, but we'll never know. You know why? Because Slash always goes for the popular thing of the week that will get him press.



Corrected it for 'ya. 22

#940 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Revolver interview with Axl » 648 weeks ago

metallex78 wrote:
Axlin12 wrote:

I'll give you one thing about DJ being full of shit... setlists. He's such a fucking liar about those damn things.

The setlist thing was actually what I was getting at most about with DJ. Mind you, they finally changed things up slightly, by adding Yesterdays and Prostitute, and playing that Angel's tribute song
But it seems like too little, too late. They only have two more dates to play, and so far its been the same stale Vegas setlists up to now.

And I'd rather they said nothing about new music unless it was ACTUALLY happening. God knows we've been lead down this road for years.

I was in a shitty mood when I posted what I wrote, but I stand by it

And never claimed Slash to be godly. That's your words, not mine
I just think it can't be THAT fucking hard to get your shit together, as Slash seems to so effortlessly do.

Yeah, its all subjective, but I'd argue that Slash has put out great songs amongst his "good" ones.
We've gotten Anastasia's and Watch This amongst his standard by the numbers stuff, and that does me just fine.
I don't see him destroying anything of his legacy with what he's put out. Slash's last tour of Australia was his biggest yet, his live playing is the best it's ever been, and he's still held in very high regard by general rock fans.

DJ may have a more talented singer on his side, but whats the point if he is getting older and getting worse, and NOT releasing anything while he's still able

Axl doesn't do fuck all, but play nostalgia setlists singing with Mickey voice, and you think Slash is destroying his legacy more than Axl.... thats laughable, and you sound like an Axl zealot saying that.


Believe it or not, I really want Axl to succeed, hence why I get shitty about what he does and says. ie. fuck all



It's not being an Axl zealot. I hear utterly NO ONE ever talk about Slash in a positive sense. Fucking ever. He's talked about like a clown in all of the rock circles i've been around, since maybe high school. And A-L-O-T of it had to do with Cypress Hill & Black Eyed Peas and Fergie. I have never met ANYONE that respects Fergie outside of the Slashites, that worship every goddamn thing he does. Her and her group are seen as a joke outside The Insider and Entertainment Tonight. Even the more urban people I know, blacks and hispanics that are more into the pop/rap scene, think they are a joke. The only time I ever see Slash gain some points back is when he does stuff with Ozzy, because Ozzy will always be Ozzy, no matter how many reality shows he does. People in those circles will always respect the Prince of Darkness.

I haven't met ONE person in at least 15 years that has said a positive thing about Slash outside of these boards, I swear on my life.

Axl on the other hand--i've heard mad respect for, for a variety of things, but also ALOT of criticism for the obvious stuff as well. Even the Slash show I went to, everyone around me groaned everytime Myles started singing, and at least two rows of people, around 50 people all in general conversation state "he's not Axl", "this guy is nowhere close to fucking Axl". Axl also got props for NOT playing the game, for as many people I met that also have called him an arrogant asshole for the exact same behavior.

For as many people i've met that tried to turn Chinese Democracy into a punchline, i've met just as many that thought it was sorely underrated, and could name favorite tracks off of it, and these are casual rock fans. Most spoken of has been Catcher In The Rye, Prostitute, This I Love, Better, and Shackler's Revenge btw.


Slash has his "shit together" because Slash plays the game. Axl doesn't. Slash is willing to suck off who he has to to play the Hollywood game at a moment's notice. American Idol, Anger Management, whatever he's doing this week. Axl has the same amount of A-list friends, but you never hear about it, because the guy refuses to not be Axl. I think that's a pro, not a con.


I'm not saying this as some sort of "fuck Slash" brigade. You guys know me better than that, and I have commended Slash where warranted. I say this because i'm sick of this one-sided bullshit where Slash CONSTANTLY gets a pass on sucking epic fucking ass, because he releases material and tours with second-rate players, and somehow becasue people VISUALLY SEE Slash more, somehow it "makes him better".

I have a real problem with that, and I do not think Slash deserves praise simply because he shoves himself down my throat regularly. He is really not an interesting person, and seems to piggie back on everyone else's media-driven whore moment of the week. I prefer Duff the most to any of them on a personal, non-music level. Duff has enough brains to know when to whore, and enough brains to know when to pull back and keep his self-respect. If Axl could be Duff (not Slash), man we would've had the best of both worlds.


I want Slash to succeed, no different than you do Axl, which is why I passionately criticize him. I know what Slash is capable of, and he is better, WAY better than the people he puts around him and the material he does.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB