You are not logged in. Please register or login.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

Didn't see this before, yes, straight socialism can't exist under democracy, but that doesn't mean some aspects can't work on a small scale. And let's be honest, we're talking communism. And taxing people to death is not the answer.

Yes, but who is really advocating "straight socialism" ? Answer: Nobody.

So it's irrelevant.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Batshit crazy:


slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
Randall Flagg wrote:

P.S.  You got your wish, Buzz.  So you should post.

Two of the most obnoxious people here, complain to high heavens about Mitch, who hurt their wittle feelings by talking to them the exact same way they talk to others here. Boo hoo hoo.

Now he's gone and the snowflakes can celebrate. Yippie!

That's the thing about jerks online, they're absolutely abysmal people, rude, arrogant and lace their posts with insults and finger pointing. But they'll hit the "report" button in a NY minute if it means those who disagree with them will go away. They want to play

Then there are people like Flagg, who threaten people on a much more personal level. On numerous occasions he's threatened to leave bad reviews for posters' businesses, "call their clients" and generally stir up trouble for them on financial level. All because he's got such thin skin, that he can't tolerate the opinions of others. He's also talked about my children and my wife, here and other forums. That's seriously fucked up. But yea...Mitch.

Just a few samples from his behavior here, threatening to hurt my business: 

1.png

2.png

This one towards Mitch:

3.png

Let's not forget, Flagg has already been banned at several places for giving out personal information before:

4.png

So yea, Mitch is gone Buzz, so come on and post.

Buzz get's angry because he called Mitch a "Cunt" (that's Buzz talking "intelligently" I guess) and I gave him a bad karma point for it. So today he's letting me know he's coming for me next. Of course Flagg is there in my karma history too, using my real name...again his usual intimidation tactic, using personal information to bully users.

5.png

6.png

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

Joe Walsh is a mega prick. Seriously, dude attacked his own supporters who confronted him on his do-nothing record. Why the media gives these assholes any airtime is beyond me. Most tea partiers got toasted for a reason. It really irks me when it was these hucksters who went in with an obstruction agenda, did nothing, and fucked up every bill that didn't adhere to right wing purity. I guess hating Trump absolves you of all sins.

I could say the same about your post. Does hating Joe Walsh absolve Trump of his sins?

You're telling me that all the things written about Trump are false, simply because Joe wrote them?

Randall Flagg
 Rep: 112 

Re: US Politics Thread

I really want that ignore feature.

And I’ve never talked about your children or wife. Seriously, why do you bother to post here every 3 months to try to stir the pot with Buzz and I. Im sure you’ll be insulting ID soon, and making up stories about him too.

Several forums? Name them. I’ve posted at two forums in the past 13 years - this one and yours. I left your forum and deleted over 1k of my posts there 8 months before you banned me, so you created a story and lied through your teeth because “banning me” 8 months since I last logged in was the only thing you could do.

You discredit yourself by showing the title of the thread you pitched a fit on to get me banned at HTGTH 13 years ago, because I called you your real name. You made up stories about stealing your identity, and chasing me out of your front yard. Just like you are claiming I ever threatened, let alone mentioned your family in any way.  All this because you publicly listed your name on your website, which I called you after you took photos of me from my public site that I foolishly shared, and created a poll of both Brody and I in uniform, and Lofton for good measure, of which one of us is the biggest American loser - at the height of the Iraq war. You’re a real class act. Fuck me for taking it personal.

Then you invite me to your forum and make me a moderator. You were totally in fear and being extorted. roll
I only have a bakers dozen of automated alert emails in my throwaway gmail account from our private messages where you sign off your PMs with your name.

You wanted this conversation, so let’s put it all out there. None of the bullshit. Tell it like it is.

I had no idea you had a newborn until you posted it here in your fabrication blog asking to ban me. You know why?  Because I don’t want to engage with you!  I left your forum nearly a year before you banned me - I didn’t care to check in! Hell, I almost exclusively interacted with Freedom the year before I left, because he’s the only one who’s opinion I ever wanted to hear.  I wasn’t interacting with you then! I don’t come to your forum because I don’t want the negativity of interacting with you - the same reason I wanted Mitch to quit posting in the only style he showed himself capable of. I didn’t even advocate for his ban!  Look at my post when someone else brought it up. I just don’t think it’s cool to use those words and accuse everyone else of being a bigot. You clearly do, as you only came back to defend him.

You only post here to bait Buzz and I. I’m not the boogeyman you’ve built me up to be. I’m not Trump, and Trump isn’t even the Trump you’ve created in your head. I’m not your outlet for all your rage. This isn’t the medium for that.

I’m not interested in engaging with you, and wish you no ill will. I don’t think you’re someone capable of having a civil conversation, and your online persona and post history is evidence of that.

We get it, you want attention. But I genuinely have no interest in engaging with you, and it’s clear no one else does either.

So insult me, call me by my real name (anyone can look at my karma to see you doing just that), steal more photos of me and insult my military service. I don’t care, because I don’t respect you.

I hope you find whatever it is you’re looking for, but if it’s a fight, I’m not interested.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

There is only one point:

You and Buzz actively worked to get another member banned for the exact same behavior as you partake in. In your case, the behavior is much worse, as you have sought out and leveraged personal information of other users as a means to harass, intimidate and extort them into silence.

That's it.

buzzsaw
 Rep: 426 

Re: US Politics Thread

buzzsaw wrote:
slcpunk wrote:

There is only one point:

You and Buzz actively worked to get another member banned for the exact same behavior as you partake in. In your case, the behavior is much worse, as you have sought out and leveraged personal information of other users as a means to harass, intimidate and extort them into silence.

That's it.

One person went on a racist rant.  Just one.  It wasn't me, it wasn't Flagg, it wasn't SG, and it wasn't ID. 

I noticed you didn't post my karma list.  Feel free to do so.  Timestamps are a wonderful thing.  I start nothing with anyone, but I finish things.  And now I am done with you as well.

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Scaramucci asks left to create 'off-ramp' for Trump officials, compares it to 'trying to deprogram people from a cult'

Anthony Scaramucci, who briefly served as President Trump's White House communications director, said the left needs to give Republicans supporting Trump the space they need to break from the president.

"We recognize that the president is a clear and present danger to the American society, the American culture. There are many people inside the White House and in the Cabinet. I would ask the left to let's create an off-ramp for those people because when you’re trying to deprogram people from a cult, one of the first things you have to do is allow them to change their mind, and you have to allow them to have the space to change their mind," Scaramucci said Sunday in a Fox News interview.

The former Trump official has doubled down on his attacks on Trump in recent weeks, after years of supporting and defending Trump's actions and rhetoric.

He said criticism of the fact that he used to defend Trump is "very justifiable."

Scaramucci said he would further explain his recent switch in an op-ed that will be published later this week in The Washington Post.

"Trust me: There's a ton of people inside that White House, inside the government, up on Capitol Hill that feel the exact same way," he said.

He also cautioned Republicans not to feel "intimidated" by Trump, likening the president to a bully. 

Trump has pushed back on Scaramucci's recent criticism, telling reporters he's called the White House repeatedly.

Scaramucci said that is false and that he has not asked for his job back.

"Look at the White House phone records. I didn't call that many times," he said.

"He's gone off the rails," Scaramucci said.

"He's acting in a way that's completely unstable. It is an issue of leadership and the culture of serving leadership. He is literally — we've gone 42 presidents since George Washington — he's literally he opposite of George Washington," he added.

https://thehill.com/homenews/administra … iw.twitter

slcpunk
 Rep: 156 

Re: US Politics Thread

slcpunk wrote:

Ouch....


misterID
 Rep: 456 

Re: US Politics Thread

misterID wrote:
slcpunk wrote:
misterID wrote:

Didn't see this before, yes, straight socialism can't exist under democracy, but that doesn't mean some aspects can't work on a small scale. And let's be honest, we're talking communism. And taxing people to death is not the answer.

Yes, but who is really advocating "straight socialism" ? Answer: Nobody.

So it's irrelevant.

Let's see, the same guy who idolizes Castro and Chavez? And every other fake-democrat trying to take over the party.

I'm not supporting Trump, and I'm not using a Trump tweet to take someone down. I definitely wouldn't use an article of one of the worst Republicans in recent history.

Mitch had ZERO self control. I tried to help the guy out, and I didn't want to see him banned. Many people here tried to help him, we tried to get him to stop his bullshit and calm down, but he just kept posting like a child and deliberately instigated personal attacks. You've been MIA a long time while I've had to deal with his stupidity.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB