You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1091 Re: Guns N' Roses » What's your dream song inclusion for these shows? » 555 weeks ago

So after slamming any time the band added a cover over the past 15 years now we want new covers?

#1092 Re: Guns N' Roses » Do you want Adler to be with GNR in Vegas, Coachella, Mexico City..... » 555 weeks ago

What's the point of Adler if there is no Izzy?

Only way I would want Adler is if this were indeed a full blown original 5 AFD reunion and it's clearly not that.

#1093 Re: Guns N' Roses » Vegas Shows Roll Call » 555 weeks ago

Anybody know the details on silver vip early entry and what exactly it gets you?

#1095 Re: Guns N' Roses » Vegas Shows Roll Call » 555 weeks ago

Got one of my tix for Friday. GA early entry. If anybody is looking to dump one let me know...I'll pay higher than face.

#1096 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 556 weeks ago

Just had an epiphany that the reason I hate Sorum is the 2 hr drum solo on the Japan DVD. Good god what a waste of time.

#1097 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 556 weeks ago

AtomsNest wrote:
FlashFlood wrote:
misterID wrote:

It's not semantics. They joined the CD band. That's the band they joined. Industrial songs?

Really, they're learning to play those songs. And you'll probably hear them on more of those songs. If they didn't like it they wouldn't have come back. They wanted back with Axl. I think thst was top priority. We have Axl, Slash and Duff in the same band and it doesn't seem to be good enough.

Id - you are right that we have Axl, Slash, Duff and it's not good enough for some people. My issue is that those who think that blame it on Axl. While he doesn't deserve benefit of the doubt, blaming the absence of Steven, Matt, Izzy, or in SGs case Gilby and fucking Zig Zag on Axl is ludicrous.

It's supposed to be Axl's band isn't it? Who else should it be on if not him? And he and Izzy are supposed to be tight, no? So he can use Izzy for nuGNR to lead some credibility, but now that Izzy wants back in he slams the door shut? Where is that infamous Axl loyalty that we keep hearing about? Izzy has had to take to twitter to try and push his way back into the band he founded, and he may never even have been consulted about the reunion in the first place.

With Matt and Steven it may be one thing. But to leave Izzy out in the cold is absolutely on Axl.

Izzy being out is on Izzy. He has made clear since 91 he is not one for the spotlight.

And yes, it is Axl's band, but what I'm boiling this down to is the philosophical difference between a "reunion" and what it really is. And in that case, if there ever was a real "feud" it makes Duff and Slash appear to be the ones acquiescing.

#1098 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 556 weeks ago

misterID wrote:
monkeychow wrote:
misterID wrote:

They wanted to join the CHINESE DEMOCRACY band. Not a reunion. They wanted back with Axl.

That's semantics though.

They wanted back in Guns N Roses because they founded it, because they wrote 83% of the bands songs, because newer bands were never accepted by the music listening public and Axl's instance that it is GNR is considered a joke to most , and because touring under the GNR brand will bring significantly more money than any of their solo efforts would.

It's not like they wanted in the band so they can play with Pittman and Frank. It's not like they've seen the light and want to start making industrial songs and follow that vision.

It's not semantics. They joined the CD band. That's the band they joined. Industrial songs?

Really, they're learning to play those songs. And you'll probably hear them on more of those songs. If they didn't like it they wouldn't have come back. They wanted back with Axl. I think thst was top priority. We have Axl, Slash and Duff in the same band and it doesn't seem to be good enough.

Id - you are right that we have Axl, Slash, Duff and it's not good enough for some people. My issue is that those who think that blame it on Axl. While he doesn't deserve benefit of the doubt, blaming the absence of Steven, Matt, Izzy, or in SGs case Gilby and fucking Zig Zag on Axl is ludicrous.

#1099 Re: Guns N' Roses » New Autographed GUNS N' ROSES Drumhead Appears To Confirm Lineup » 556 weeks ago

Anybody complaining about this lineup should point their frustration at Slash and Duff. They chose to rejoin the band. It's not Axl's fault that Adler, Sorum, Stradlin, etc. aren't a part of it - Slash and Duff chose to rejoin a current touring entity. They were clearly ok with rejoining Axl's band, and obviously they don't care about other former members because they are happy to play these shows without an ultimatum. MAYBE at the end of the day the compromise was no 3rd guitarist, no second keyboardist, but nothing related to who the other "2" were.

#1100 Re: Guns N' Roses » Slash and Duff working on CD II according to MSL » 557 weeks ago

I think they would have veered from "industrial". Goin' Down proves that. It also proved Tommy could fill Izzy's songwriting void.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB