You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1431 Re: Guns N' Roses » How much of the board actually believes a reunion will happen? » 571 weeks ago
Sweet. I was at the Leeds show in 2001. Was an epic night. Not my ideal venue but a few guys I know would be up for a trip back for old times sake. We'll see on Friday then I guess.. If not before!
#1432 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Walking Dead » 571 weeks ago
Boring as fuck.
Far too much talking.
Only old wrinkly face died.
Show needs a major cull. Glad Deanna's face won't be seen again.
But typical episode. Characters acting stupid & still surviving. If this is what it's going to be like I think I'd rather become a zombie than live with those sort of people.
#1433 Re: Guns N' Roses » How much of the board actually believes a reunion will happen? » 571 weeks ago
Idle speculation: a hypothetical Axl/Slash/Duff/Fortus/Ferrer/Dizzy reunion will put any album on the back burner for the time being – there's no point shooting the "new music" bolt when the mere fact of a reunion will sell tour tickets on its own. Diehard forum fans will whinge; no-one else will care – just like diehard forum fans will whinge that it isn't a "real" reunion without Izzy and Adler. Izzy (and, hell, maybe Adler) will drop in for odd shows on the tour.
Axl will take the best of the CDII material (possibly including some Izzy collaborations – Down By The Ocean?) and mash it up with the best of the Duff/Slash material (perhaps those Velvet Revolver tracks they demoed with Corey Taylor?), stripping out Ashba/Bumblefoot tracks (praise be!) and Finck/Buckethead/Stinson tracks (boo!) and replacing them with Slash and Duff. We might get a Stinson track or two, like Goin' Down. The album will probably be called Guns N' Roses, because there's a statement of intent right there; the record company will drop it in the 2016 holiday season or (more likely) Summer 2017, to promote the next leg of the tour.
Diehard forum fans will whinge. Because they always find something to whinge about.
they'll tour without an album. they'll talk about recording after the tour but it'll never happen.
after he cashes in the reunion for a couple of spins he's done.
he has no interest in releasing records.
for all the blame correctly attributed to label mismanagement, the big guy has talked before how much duress he feels in releasing material. he can't handle people judging him, his art.
#1435 Re: Guns N' Roses » NOTHING TO SEE HERE!!! » 571 weeks ago
Wouldn't mind a wee trip to coachella. Party with Kendall Jenner & various California hipsters. Think I'd fit in well in that scene..
#1436 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R Are Now Selling Classic-Lineup Merch, It's Actually a Pretty Big » 571 weeks ago
Holy fuck am I sick of entire crowds holding up phones at concerts. When it first started, bands should have demanded they put that shit down or they're walking offstage. Instead its become the norm. A shame.
Been to a few gigs now where the band has stopped playing and ask people to stop recording on their phones.
Walking off stage is a bit much tho.. Unless we're living life on Axl terms! No mobile phones or Slash tshirts!
Oh wait Slash tshirts are ok these days.. Since he's back in the band and all 
#1437 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Video Game Console Thread » 571 weeks ago
Re DLC
Have to say, sometimes it's really good & not just cut content that didn't get put into the main game so the devs/publisher could make a few extra canoli's down the line.
The most recent expansion I bought was for the witcher 3 & it was basically a level pack, like a 10 hour sidequest. The kinda depth of story they probably couldn't have put into the main game without fragmenting it. It was superbly well done. Add it to the 16 or so pieces of free dlc they offered (which varied from alt outfits to short missions), I think they absolutely nailed it as to what additional content should be.
The flip side to that is the kind of treatment you get from EA/Activision - the recent dungheap that is Star Wars, or how they rolled out Destiny as prime examples of fleecing punters.
I did destiny upon launch & did the first expansion. I was so pissed off I've refused to give them any more of my money or my time. It was just completely inadequate & extortionate.
Gta online kinda occupies a middle ground. All subsequent dlc has been 'free', but it's a f2p model so unless you've glitched gtao currency you have to pay to access some of the features the dlc includes. But, crucially, a lot of what they have brought in since launch was stuff that was cut from release & just held over for dlc - there's been very little evolution or fresh ideas put into play. It's a bum note but not quite as game breaking/off putting as practices elsewhere.
I guess it all depends on the publisher really, and how good the game is. People said that the last of us dlc was great whereas you get stuff like what they're doing with Star Wars.
It's just I wouldn't say all dlc is a bad idea - I'm really looking forward to the next witcher expansion, probably moreso than I am any full game on the horizon.
Patches tho are another matter. Day 1 patches especially. I've been playing games since they came on tape(!) & I really miss cartridges - I mourned the passing of the N64 for the gamecubes stupid little discs (& probably still do).
It's definitely a problem, especially considering how much bandwidth these patches eat up. But it seems to be the way the industry is going. I'm all for digital distribution (if prices on the ps store weren't so ludicrous in comparison with physical copies) but there's gotta be something done to help the consumer. A lot of the time you're just as well waiting a few months & buying the GOTY edition on the high street that has all patches included. As it stands it looks like the industry is taking that infamous "deal with it" stance.
If the game isn't ready & hasn't been tested properly it's just totally unfair & there's nothing in place currently to prevent the customer from these practices. I blame those ET landfills.. That sorta shit would happen to far more games these days if it weren't for these patches.
#1438 Re: The Sunset Strip » The Video Game Console Thread » 571 weeks ago
that's impressive work neemo. i admire your dedication! anyone who 100% one of those open world ubisoft games, fair play.
think i've got most of my very few platinums from telltale games..
don't think i'll do fallout 4. not yet anyway. tempted by the elder scrolls online, especially in these black friday sales.
will - i really loved sleeping dogs. reminded me of the one yakuza game i played (ps2?) mixed w/gta. it was good fun.
think i'll prob do just cause 3. have avoided most of the pre-christmas games fo4/star wars/cod.
was hoping mad max was going to appear on the ps store black friday sale but not to be. maybe it'll be in the 12 days of christmas sale if they're doing that this year. it's really the only one from this year i haven't played that i've got my eye on.
#1439 Re: Guns N' Roses » How much of the board actually believes a reunion will happen? » 571 weeks ago
guns will never play glastonbury. those people have far too many sticks up their arses. would think guns too much a headache/below them.
& while we obv want the reunion in our own neck of the woods, the euro festival circuit is the way to go. it's just the done thing/the easiest way to tour in the summer.
#1440 Re: Guns N' Roses » How much of the board actually believes a reunion will happen? » 571 weeks ago
yea Slane would be sweet. great venue, natural amphitheater.
have fond memories of slipping on my hole in the mud dancing to honky tonk women. it's about all i can remember from that day..

