You are not logged in. Please register or login.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#421 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 763 weeks ago
Aye that would still be cool, just let the audience sing the vocals.
#422 Re: Guns N' Roses » Robin Finck Discussion » 763 weeks ago
I think you need to lay of the eletric lettuce mate
Never heard it called that before lol! Thats what I'm needing, all I've got these days is vodka and its making me crabbit as fuck.
#423 Re: Guns N' Roses » What cover song would you like to see on Guns N`Roses next album » 763 weeks ago
I like their Nightrain cover 
If their gonna insist on covering AC/DC I'd like to hear Touch To Much 
#424 Re: Guns N' Roses » Crash Diet 2012 » 763 weeks ago
I think its West Arkeen on lead.
#425 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot Visits Maxim Magazine » 763 weeks ago
russtcb wrote:Olorin wrote:Are you playing dumb or whit?
Naw I'm not saying that and you know that! Axl Rose is the guy who's put the brakes on any new member of Guns N'Roses recording and bringing their own work to add to the GNR legacy, thats why after 6 years in the band Bumblefoot has to ponce around to Slash's guitar anthems.
I really wasn't trying to be dumb. Here's my question; what would you like BBF to do in that situation? He was at Maxim as "Lead Guitarist of Guns N' Roses". Would you think he'd just bust out and play a solo cut or something?
Maybe bust out something from CD? I guess that's the problme and what si so glaringly patehtic about the situation. Ron is there as the lead guitarist of Gn'R and yet he's busting out tunes that are 25 years old that he had absolutely nothing to do with. It's such a farce. Axl won't allow these guys to become Guns N' Roses so instead they have to pretend to be by playing the old guys stuff even in these little promotional type settings. Nothing against Ron of course because like you said what else is he to do but the situation itself is beyond lame. Put out a fucking album already Axl... ya know.
Yeah it aint Rons fault, he's stuck between a rock and a hard place. Noone would be able to make any kind of correlation between him and Guns N' Roses if he busted out the Scraped solo...
I can imagine in our nearest parallel dimension he played Catcher In the Rye and they were all singing along 
#426 Re: Guns N' Roses » RRHoF Discussion (Izzy/Slash/Axl Press Statements) » 763 weeks ago
Scabbie wrote:russtcb wrote:This is why I say Axl is literally damned either way. If dude comes out and kills it with the original guys, everyone will shit on him for going back to tour with "today's Guns N' Roses" and if he doesn't do it, everyone will shit on him.
Probably. Mostly his fault. But I'd have far more respect for him if he'd 'man up' and do the reunion. Unless he releases an album quickly which is his get out of jail card.
That's kind of where I'm at right now. I'd have no problem with Axl not wanting to "reunite" for one night if there was some new music on the horizon. I love that the band is touring like crazy right now and I love that they're playing a fair amount of Chinese Democracy tracks while mixing in some older gems. BUT, when they start hitting up the same countries, cities, venues without anything "new" to push, that's when I scratch my head a little. I get that Axl is upset that the album release was screwed up from the beginning and he feels it deserves to be given its due. But I still don't see what they're doing now as giving the album its just due. I think that ship has sailed. You can't really promote and push an album 4 years after the record company has wiped their hands clean of it. It just doesn't work that way. And there's NO indication of any new music on the horizon, so it makes me wonder.
It'd just be a lot easier to swallow Axl's wanting to take this current lineup to new heights, if there were any clear signs of them trending in that direction. Unfortunately, it's a tough spot. Albums don't really sell anymore. Money isn't made off of albums. I'm sure the label isn't thrilled at the prospect of a new GNR album after all that happened with the last one. Music videos are a thing of the past. Axl doesn't like doing interviews. There's not a whole lot going for them, aside from them touring at this point, which is why I guess they continue to do so.
Is that how much of a whore Axl Rose is? What about the art?
Theres a million bands out there creating and proudly showing off their art for little to no financial reward, its all about the art.
999,999 of those bands dont have any mainstream support or interest whatsoever. They would kill for even the tiniest fraction imaginable of the kind of resources, opportunity and privilege Axl Rose has at a nod or a whim.
#427 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot Visits Maxim Magazine » 763 weeks ago
Are you playing dumb or whit?
Naw I'm not saying that and you know that! Axl Rose is the guy who's put the brakes on any new member of Guns N'Roses recording and bringing their own work to add to the GNR legacy, thats why after 6 years in the band Bumblefoot has to ponce around to Slash's guitar anthems.
#428 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bumblefoot Visits Maxim Magazine » 763 weeks ago
Naw man, its a light year from it. Paradise City by Bumblefoot, gimmie a break.
Russ, Bumblefoot can play that for the next 100 years and it will still have nothing to do his place in Guns N'Roses.
#429 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R returns to the UK » 763 weeks ago
Sky Dog wrote:Thin Lizzy opening in the UK....NOW THAT'S A GOOD OPENER.
Is Fortus going to be playing with them? His fingers are going to be knackered.
Anyway, anyone going to the O2 gig? Want to grab a jar or several beforehand?
Still havnt got a ticket for any show, flat broke at the mo. It'll be a last minute thing for me, might get a Glasgow ticket this week, quite fancy a London trip as well, if I do then I'm defo up for getting a few drinks.
#430 Re: Guns N' Roses » GN'R returns to the UK » 763 weeks ago
I'm guessing the Reading Festival guy just got asked the question in an interview and its been blown up into a big statement. GNR are coming to the UK, cant have a positive article in the press can we? There has barely been a word in the press and the little that has been said has been very very ugly indeed.
