You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#441 Re: Guns N' Roses » Why Axl Rose and Guns N' Roses Kick Ass in 2012 » 763 weeks ago

monkeychow wrote:

It's actually quite an interesting idea to me you guys have raised...low how many 'faulty' or 'bad' products does something have to have before you move away from a brand and then to what extent does the "bad stuff" ruin your appreciation of the good?

Metalalex's example of metallica is interesting. I know Metallica fans that loved Puppets and Justice and that sound and those people found the black album too rockish, then really disliked load and reload, saw no value in S+M, didn't like St Anger and LuLu is unspeakable. Death Magnetic helped a little, but I think there's a lot of those folks at the end of the rope.

Star wars is an example for me maybe. The original trilogy was fundamental to my child hood, something I considered a work of genius and one of the greatest movie trilogies of all time. Then they made the 3 new ones - which I won't derail the thread with a length exposition of why I don't like them - but lets just say I tried with all my heart to get into the spirit of it and love them - and other than a few fun moments - 95% of the films I disliked. I think it's worse than music too - as they've altered the whole universe and context the story took place in - so even when they don't directly effect the original they sort of do - whereas at least in music - AFD will stand uneffected by a CD3 or a Snakepit5 or whatever. But I must say the starwars stuff really got to a point where my interest in anything else new they make is minimal - and while I love the old films still - it's sort of bittersweet in my mind as they feel sort of defiled by what happened later on to them.

For me this doesn't apply to GNR as I love CD, but I can see for some people it could start to become an issue a few albums in. Although it's probably also relevant I guess that it's fundamentally a different band (aside from Axl) even though it has the same name while the U2 example given is the original line up.

It does interest me overall, how many times of feeling fan-raped by your product makes you quit. I have friends that follow WWE but have hated it for like 5 or 6 years in a row now but hang in there because they've watched for 25 years overall. But sooner or later it's going to need to "improve" (adjust to their liking) or eventually their credit gets too low.

Actually I think that's what it comes down to huh. How much existing credit does a band have.

Its not Axls new products that are get on my tits, its the lack of them. I'd be all over an Phantom Menace, Attack Of The Clones, Revenge of The Sith production starring Bumblefoot, Stinson, Pitman... whoever.

Its just that having Bumblefoot, Stinson, Pitman... whoever, play out the classic parts of Star Wars, Empire Strikes Back and Return Of the Jedi over and over and over and over and over, and calling it a progression of the Star Wars saga is guaranteed to eventually make even the most pious and basement bound nerd raise an eyebrow.

#442 Re: Guns N' Roses » Video footage from Axl's house » 763 weeks ago

Actually everyone should take a good long hard look at that toilet. This is the digital lavvy of the man who frittered away $15 million of Universals money that they gave up front to help him in make a record.
The man with the digital lavvy who, along with his servants, cries and whines with tales of suffering, hardship and woe as he battled in the trenches of injust, fighting evil doers, spooks and goblins in his selfless quest to spend $15 million to make a record.



I havnt seen a lavvy pan that grand since Saddam's Palace fell in 2003 13

#443 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mar. 12th, 2012 - House of Blues, Los Angeles, CA » 764 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:

Robin's blues solos prior to SCoM on the 2006 tour were fuckin' awesome!

russtcb wrote:

God damn that boy can play... he good!

#445 Re: Guns N' Roses » Leaks - nothing exciting please dont panic » 764 weeks ago

Both fake and the red panda shit was dreamed up at mygnr.

#446 Re: Guns N' Roses » Video footage from Axl's house » 764 weeks ago

Axl's eels are really cool, wish I was a zillionaire 14

#447 Re: Guns N' Roses » Video footage from Axl's house » 764 weeks ago

Apparantly the song in the backround is Angie by The Stones.

#448 Guns N' Roses » Video footage from Axl's house » 764 weeks ago

Olorin
Replies: 27

http://link.brightcove.com/services/pla … 8659913001


At 2.40 onwards theres a song playing in the backround that sounds like Axl singing.

#449 Re: Guns N' Roses » Mar. 12th, 2012 - House of Blues, Los Angeles, CA » 764 weeks ago

I hope that digging out these old covers and bringing back 2 of the main players from CD at the end of this tour is a tribute to the past, signaling a change in direction for the next tour.
Surely they have got to freshen it up somehow for the return to europe?

Mon tae fuck Axl, even a teensy, tiny, toaty wee bit?

#450 Re: The Garden » The Wrestling thread » 764 weeks ago

Would be cool if Austin interferes and screws The Rock, setting up his "one last match" with Rock next year.

I wanna see one more Austin/Rock match, so does the world, if its ever going to happen now is the time.
Austin/Punk just pales in comparison, I dont see the point in coming back for that match.

Plus he's scared that he could end up seriously hurt cause of his neck issue, I can only really see him getting the ring with someone he has complete confidence in.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB