You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#11121 Re: Guns N' Roses » Revisiting the Billboard Interview » 910 weeks ago

Why can't Slash keep a lead singer, D? tongue

People have called out Axl and Slash. And people who've worked with them haved raved about them both, too. So, you look at it how you want.  I'm not saying anyone is 100% right or wrong. Which went to my Duff comment. It's just not true when you make it out that everyone loves Slash and that somehow he's to be believed more than Axl. That is just not accurate. People who know Slash have attacked his credibility and honesty in the past. Not just Axl. I give Axl a lot of shit, but your argument(s) is pretty biased, D.

#11122 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Chart Positions Thread » 910 weeks ago

16

An Axl solo album = The same guys, bitching about the same shit, constantly giving conspiracy theories as to why everything leads to a reunion. The GNR name would just be one less bitching point for you guys. Other than that....

#11123 Re: Guns N' Roses » Revisiting the Billboard Interview » 910 weeks ago

These assumptions and theories are always nice. But in reality, if Uni was telling Axl to either get back with the old band or they'd drop him, he would be dropped right now.  I doubt, from everything I've seen and heard from Axl in the last ten years, that anything will make him do what he doesn't want to do.

And the main thing: Axl can take the finished recordings that he has to any label who wants it, and there are labels that would kill for a guy who has the ability to sell 3 million albums around the world... That's just in 6 months.

And as for Axl not being able to blackmail uni anymore... I think it was quite clear to everyone that he was holding no one hostage with CD. They were willing to eat it. Axl and Azoff just cleared the debt, which was the major sticking point.

And how can Slash be wrong... I hate getting into this, because I wasn't there, I don't know the full story, and niether does anyone else so this makes these arguments completely useless.... But didn't Duff even disagree with how Slash remembers things? And I've never heard Duff or Izzy go into any real detail about how things went down. And really, I haven't seen the people who were actually involved, and who do talk it, actually agree on what happened:  Axl-Slash-Doug. So I don't know who "all these people" who agree with Slash are, outside you guys.

And I'm not taking sides here, but just to even things out, Axl's explanation is just as realistic as the others I've heard.

Here's a thought:

Maybe Axl talked about Slash in his interviews so much because, I don't know, HE READS THESE BOARDS and this is all you guys can ever friggin talk about along with all of these assumptions and theories you pull out of your asses. 16

Those interviews were a direct result of (and aimed at) these boards. And you punks!

19

#11124 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chinese Democracy Trilogy? » 911 weeks ago

I'm really not trying to offend anyone, and really, maybe I'm not as attached to this band to the extent some of you are where it illicits such... strange reactions... But if you're in the mindset that you don't want anything else from this band, that you just want them to fade away, or not have anything to with them unless Slash is involved... I don't know. If it causes such a depressing disposition for you... hmm

The whole reason I got back into the band/the new line up was the possibility of great music... Maybe I'm in the minority here, because I think they delievered on that. And I'm very interested in what else is out there.

Not only am I convinced the next album will happen, I think the album is finished and has been for a while. It's totally possible that its still waiting around to have Bumblefoot additions to it, and now, probably DJ whoever. But the way Axl is talking, unlike the whole CD mess, this album is basically being talked about as a finished project.

One way or another, on Geffen or another label, the second album will surface. Leaks or whatever, I'm still very interested in the CD sessions.

#11125 Re: Guns N' Roses » Revisiting the Billboard Interview » 911 weeks ago

You can't really blame Universal/Geffen for being pissed off and not giving a shit after 2002 -- 

Axl really shouldn't be surprised. 2004 they cut his funding. And some pretty credible sources have stated that the label has washed their hands of him after years of trying to help him.

And really...

THEY GAVE HIM 13 MILLION DOLLARS AND SEVEN YEARS TO MAKE THIS RECORD!!!!

They aren't exactly being monsters. Funny thing is he still doesn't understand why they're treating him like this. 16

#11126 Re: Guns N' Roses » Eddie Trunk: What's Up With Guns N Roses? » 911 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:

here is a preview of the stage setup at gnr chinese demomcracy tour 2010

http://i40.tinypic.com/oril2x.jpg

16

I really could see the Duff/Loaded thing happening. Even Duff dueting with Axl on Dust N' Bones. Maybe even a cover like Duff did with Ron, and Axl did with Izzy.

Someone quoted it above, but Axl said something about playing with Duff - on guitar.

To be honest, since it looks like the stadium summer tour thing isn't happening, this would be a good combo for an up-coming tour, like a 2006 size tour... 

Even though I'd rather see a House of Blues/Hard Rock tour.

#11127 Re: Guns N' Roses » Is this for fkin real or what? » 911 weeks ago

Lobster and hot naked chicks sounds good to me.

#11128 Re: Guns N' Roses » Eddie Trunk: What's Up With Guns N Roses? » 911 weeks ago

I could see Loaded touring with GNR and Duff playing on some songs like Izzy did. That would be cool.

^^And those fans need to stop acting like they're involved in any way with Slash and Axl. That's always blown my mind about some fans. I don't prefering Axl over Slash, but acting like they're personally involved is friggin creepy.

#11129 Re: Guns N' Roses » Eddie Trunk: What's Up With Guns N Roses? » 911 weeks ago

The only time I've really disagreed with you buzz, (not including your opinion based on the new line up because you have your thoughts and I'm not trying to change that) is when you state your opinions as fact and totally write off anything else anyone says that doesn't jive with your views. That maes it hard for me to take you seriously. But like I said, the old band means a lot to you, so I do understand where you're coming from. And I'll try to be more aware of that in the future/

19


As for my views Vs. your views:

I don't see this current line up as huge, or great. And my favorite line up of GNR, the 2002 version, is gone. It ain't coming back. And I blame Axl for that. But I'm not throwing stones at the current line up for it. I'm used to how this band operates. And I'm totally fine with how this band charts, how big or small concert attendance is, or how small they are in relation to GNR in its prime. I really don't care. They don't have to be huge. I just want killer music. That's all I care about. He delivered on that for me. That's where I stand. I'm not holding one line up over the other and I'm not pissing on another to help build up the one I like. I like them all.

And I don't see this band as something its not.

And I'm not sold that album sales equals a fanbase. I own a lot of records of bands I'm not a huge fan of and have no intention of seeing them live. GNR has some classic songs that people want in their collections. I don't see that as a sign of people wanting, or caring about the old line up getting back together. But I could be wrong there. I just don't see it being viewed any more than Motley Crue.

GNR never had the relationship with the fans to sustain a huge following like Aerosmith for example. I think a reunion would be big for nostalgia purposes, but that's about it. And I don't mean that as a negative.

#11130 Re: Guns N' Roses » Eddie Trunk: What's Up With Guns N Roses? » 911 weeks ago

Oh, I understand, but the release of the album followed everything to do with how this band has operated: Half ass.

I really think he did have a big vision for the album. But he shot himself in the foot too many times and the powers that be are the ones who cashed out.

CD could have been huge. Its not. He blew that chance. Nothing will change that. We'll see what happens next.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB