You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#1301 Re: Guns N' Roses » Rock Band 2 Rip » 900 weeks ago

this one is without crowd noises and everything.

#1302 Guns N' Roses » Rock Band 2 Rip » 900 weeks ago

strat0
Replies: 22

I've aquired a Rock Band 2 rip of SR if anyone's interested....pm

#1303 Re: Guns N' Roses » Information on Shackler's Revenge » 900 weeks ago

russtcb wrote:

GNR could go the "Prince route" and put CD in with Best Buy ads for free.

Or at least a single, or EP

#1304 Re: Guns N' Roses » The silence on the eve of RB2 is deafening! » 900 weeks ago

there's already decent rips of the song out there. Go to Myspace.com/shacklersrevenge someone posted a good rip of it there, although they don't have it open for dowloading, so good rips have been out there for at least a day or more.

#1305 Re: Guns N' Roses » request-a photo` » 900 weeks ago

all i see is a red x dude....try reposting?

#1306 Re: Guns N' Roses » The silence on the eve of RB2 is deafening! » 901 weeks ago

Calling James a fool is like Azoff buying MSL a beer and handing him a copy of CD. It just doesn't happen, and shouldn't happen. Btw is this site endorsed by Izzy? Or do you own Chopaway James?

#1307 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will you still buy CD? » 901 weeks ago

Axlin08 wrote:
Neemo wrote:

see for me (going with that mindset axlin08) i am the kinda guy who will support any thing that axl or slash release as long as the product is something that they endorse...for instance i never bought hollywood rose cuz axl didnt agree with it...i dont buy unauthorized bios, i dont buy tributes to gnr, i didnt buy gnr greatest hits....these products were not endorsed by those guys but have the gnr moniker on them

especially the GH package....i mean if axl and slash can agree on something then that really says alot...and trying to block the release of GH was somethign that they both agreeed on...prolly the only thing they have agreed on since TSI was released

Agreed. I only own what's endorsed by the band.


I just have a real problem giving money to people who are trying to make money off of the GN'R name. A name that was built by other men. One could pose that argument to the new band, but the difference is they are offcially sanctioned members of Guns N' Roses who contributed to future albums. I'll buy their solo records too, even former members such as Bucket or Izzy.

But when it comes to these cash grabs by other people, such as Hollywood Rose or the tribute albums, i'll only download for free just to hear what it's like. Most of the time I puke, and then delete it.

I still refuse to purchase ANY books on GN'R other than "Slash".

Yes but another differance with the new guys is that !) Axl likes them. 2) he hasn't backed over their cds with his ferrari 16.........yet. lol

#1308 Re: Guns N' Roses » Will you still buy CD? » 901 weeks ago

I don't see why people take it personal either. It's not as if Axl walked up to your house and waved the cd in your face and said "Haha you'll have to wait until 2008 to hear this."

#1309 Re: Guns N' Roses » Information on Shackler's Revenge » 901 weeks ago

That is true...the only way we would get a single is if Best Buy consesnts. And as to Rock Band I'm pretty sure it was just a release exclusive. As in they are the first to release the song. That doesn't mean exclusive rights to the song itself.

#1310 Re: Guns N' Roses » We still might get CD before X-Mas » 901 weeks ago

BrokenGlassNCigs wrote:

It is the beginning of what is expected to be a series of announcements about Guns '˜N Roses, the main point being that the album will be finally released and before Christmas.

What was expected was a release date of '99 at the latest. This doesn't mean jack to anyone.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB