You are not logged in. Please register or login.

#16982 Re: Guns N' Roses » Bucket » 941 weeks ago

She's such a fuckin' nazi.


The man is ALL OVER THE ALBUM. The man is ON THE NEW SINGLE.

And she continues to be a fucking cunt over there, because Bucket made her lick the jizz off his hands when he was recording the material.


What a bbbbbbbiiiiiiiaaaaaaacccch.

#16983 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

The reviews so far have been mixed. I talked to a friend-through-a-friend that works in radio, specifically rock, and he said reactions have been mixed almost right down the line, and alot like people have stated. Younger fans, or fans who are just casual fans of the band, seem to really dig the track, whereas the old Gunners are just ripping it to shreds.

*his opinion below*

He is a GN'R fan, and likes the track, but like others have echoed... he just doesn't feel it's all that strong. As an album opener for Chinese Democracy, he feels it'll work great (I agree), but releasing it as a single, as the FIRST single seems to be a bit of a misstep. It just isn't there to be that for the band. He actually feels Shackler's Revenge would've been a better track to release first. The song, in his opinion, sounds so modern and so mainstream that it would appeal to a modern rock radio audience, unlike some of the more GNR-ish tracks on tap. Shackler's sounds like (*shutter*) a track Shinedown or Disturbed or some other very mainstream rock act would do, with the exception of the very exceptional guitar work, but the structure of the song is very "now". Then release Better as the second single, and TWAT for the third, unless some sort of ballad unearths itself to be a good radio-ready single.

He also feels Street of Dreams doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell of ever charting if it's the 'ballad' that's released.


I agree with about 90% of that.

#16984 Re: Guns N' Roses » have the leaks killed the hype? » 941 weeks ago

If they release something like Better or TWAT closer to release, it'll explode imo.

#16985 Re: Guns N' Roses » have the leaks killed the hype? » 941 weeks ago

Actually I completely disagree. I think the leaks softened the blow, and warmed the audience up a bit. Same goes for the live performances.


If CD had hit radio waves for the first time ever yesterday, people EVEN MORE SO imo would've slagged it saying "15 years... for this?!?!?"

#16986 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

Neemo wrote:
Axlin08 wrote:

One of the problems with the vocals, something I noticed immediately, but let slide (because's it's Axl's thing) is this double and triple vocaling the fucking tracks.

I can't find one single person other than him that likes that shit. Not one.

It makes the vocals sound overproduced, and unbalanced. He started doing that during the Illusions, and believe me, it's still just as stupid sounding now as it was then.

oh dear...you too? the honeymoon's over so fast? haha j/k 19

I knew if I said the slightest critique of this song, someone would be on my ass and fast.


I guess I deserve it. 16


The song is still bloody amazing.

#16987 Re: Guns N' Roses » Radio Reacts To Guns N' Roses Single » 941 weeks ago

One of the problems with the vocals, something I noticed immediately, but let slide (because's it's Axl's thing) is this double and triple vocaling the fucking tracks.

I can't find one single person other than him that likes that shit. Not one.

It makes the vocals sound overproduced, and unbalanced. He started doing that during the Illusions, and believe me, it's still just as stupid sounding now as it was then.

The man has a beautiful voice. I love it. But I would much rather see him go low, mid, then high, as the sound keeps building throughout (think KOHD live), but doing this multi-layered vocal technique just leaves you... why?

After a few listens, instrumentally the song is the strongest it's ever been, but I think the vocals were better on the 2006/07 demos.

#16988 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chris Pitman Interview » 941 weeks ago

Thanks for posting that link Russ. For those who haven't listened, most of the questions were GN'R related with only a few referring to the Sex Tapes project.

*Pittman basically said that he's happy to see the album finally released

*Silkworms they felt was a bit ahead of it's time (and it is) and they shelved it for a later album and hopefully it'd see the light of day

*He described it as "Guns N' Roses in the future"

*I think he also said a couple words of an album of that kind of material, that Silkworms by itself just didn't work on the Chinese album

*He said it was an honor to work with Brian May on Catcher, but the last time they worked with him was around 2000 or 2001 and that he didn't know how much of May's work was on the final Catcher on the album

*He also gave the impression that the single release of CD and the album's release came as a bit of a surprise

*Axl didn't know he was from Kansas City and when he found out they hit it off pretty well and related pretty well like long lost brothers, both being from the midwest

*He stated it was cool to hear If The World on Body Of Lies and Body of Lies was a cool dark movie that hits a bit of a nerve with the current political landscape

#16989 Re: The Garden » What If...? McCain Hired Hollywood Directors to Make Ads » 941 weeks ago

That's hilarious.

What McCain really needs is Michael Mann to direct his ads. Think Tom Cruise in Collateral. That'd be awesome...

#16990 Re: Guns N' Roses » Chris Pitman Interview » 941 weeks ago

That MP3 at top is blank. No audio, no even reception of audio in the file.

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB