I agree with the anti-Slash community. It's all boring retro music, nothing new like Public Enemy drum beats from the 80s, or ten different synths lines. Not to mention that this is dated guitar music (with only one(!) lead player - where does this guy live???), not something magnificent Pro Tools cut and paste. Slash can't even record an album where you can hear that the parts are from different decades. I knew it was coming, but it's worse than I expected. It shows everything why I hate Guns N' Roses.

Classic GN'R sounding song, I really love it. It could have been on any GN'R album. (Except one. )

Thanks, FD!

Universal, not Sanctuary? I know that Uni bought Sanctuary, but that company still exists, doesn't it? Does it work independent, or is it strongly controled by Uni?

I think it's ridiculous to say that Slash 'hides behind the singers' and to insinuate that the only respectable solo album by a guitarist is an instrumental record. No. For Slash the singer's voice is an important music instrument. I'm sure if he wrote an all instrumental record the chorus would be 'well, Slash can't work with singers, history proved that, the instrumental record is his confession'. Now we have the joke that 'Slash is playing safe cause he has singers'. WTF? I'm waiting for Axl to do an a capella record. That'd be great.

Slash is a team-player. I have yet to hear an instrumental guitar album that is not boring, and I play guitar.

It's funny that Slash has 13 singers on his album, yet none of them is good enough for some. Guess they can only accept Axl, although they wouldn't want a reunion, cause 'Axl doesn't need Slash'. Maybe. But as it seems for sure Slash doesn't need Axl, just somebody better than Scott Weiland to write catchy and great songs. On his album he has a lot of better singers. I would love to hear a full Slash/Stockdale, Slash/Kennedy or Slash/DeLuca album.

This album will be great.

Long live